Glad you've asked.
As I was saying, the most trivial example is free healthcare for all citizens. A later issue than the original 1920 program, but the nazis were for it (well, only for the ethnic Germans, since everyone else was to be stripped of citizenship, cf point 4 of the program.) MAGA would and did have fits even hearing about single-payer insurance.
We agree on that one, more or less. However, as for the rest:
Other examples from the actual 25 point NSDAP program (as signed on Feb 24 1920 by Adolf) include:
- free higher education on the state's expense for particularly smart children, so as to stop favouring the wealthy (point 20)
- expanding old age welfare (point 15)
- expanding and supporting the middle class (point 16)
- ensuring a living wage for citizens (point 7)
- freedom of religion for all denominations... except for the Jews (point 24)
- improving public health, increasing protections for mothers and children, flat-out forbidding underage labour, and supporting PE (point 21)
As I was mentioning, there are more later examples, but this will do for a casual talk on a non-history board.
There's a difference between what fascists
say they're gonna do once they get into power and what they
actually do once they're there.
– Hitler didn't exactly
"stop favouring the wealthy" – unless the wealthy were Jews. In
Mein Kampf, he was very anti-elitist as was Trump in his campaign speeches in 2016. For instance, Hitler objected to
fencing (an elitist sport) and favored
boxing (proletarian) instead. However, in the case of both of them, what they thought of as elites and where they managed to grab onto an already existing resentment in the working classes was:
the elites = the educated! 'Those people who think they are smarter than us! A comeuppance is what's needed.'
– Did Hitler
actually expand and support the middle class? Does Trump?
– The Nazis didn't ensure a living wage. They had the advantage that they came into power
after the Great Depression peaked, and employment did increase. However, they didn't raise hourly wage rates but instead increased the number of working hours. Trump, of course, also claimed that he would increase the number of jobs. They always do.
– Freedom of religion ... in words but not in deeds. Not unlike Republicans, who claim that Muslims will make praying to Allah mandatory – while local GOP candidates are trying to make Christianity mandatory.
– Didn't Trump and the GOP promise to improve public health? To protect mothers and children? Underage labour was never really a point in campaign speeches, but Jeffrey Tucker and other billionaires would certainly like to 'give underage children the
freedom to work.' (Hitler recruited them as soldiers towards the end of WW2.)
– Supporting PE. Yes, but why? People needed to be strong in order to fight wars and bear children. Wars are different today. For the most part, man-against-man warfare has been replaced by bombs and drones. And yet, very similar
ideals of physical fitness still exist, the pathetic poster boys for this trend in the GOP being RFK Jr. and Pete Hegseth. The latter is hoping to replace PE with what he thinks is a more contemporary version: mandatory testosterone shots for male personnel in the army. The toxic masculinity in Nazi Germany is very similar to the GOP's admiration for scum like the Tate brothers. A major difference is the toxic femininity. All in all, women in the 3rd Reich looked much healthier than the MAGA women. Even Nazis would have been disgusted by the Mar-a-Lago look.
So if you consider the difference between promises given and promises (not) kept, there are more similarities than differences between the GOP and the NSDAP.