Sol88
Philosopher
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2009
- Messages
- 8,437
Here's a link for Sol's second quote
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2041-8205/802/1/L12
Note that the "equivalent bulk density" figure missing from his quote is "< 1 kg m-3"
Sol still wants us to think the barest mention of dust or charge implies rocks or lightning bolts. Sad.
Did they mention how they arrived at that figure? <1kgm-3?
particle crosses a laser curtain, and is detected by photoelectric sensors (GDS, grain detection system) registering a signal (proportional to the particle cross section times the albedo) and the time at which the laser curtain is crossed. Then the particle hits the impact sensor (IS, with the same GDS cross section, A=10−2m2), which registers the individual particle impact momentum and its travel time from GDS to IS. The combination of GDS and IS measurements (GDS+IS particles) provides the particle mass and velocity, and constrains the particle bulk density by means of calibration curves (Della Corte et al. 2016) derived on the ground using cometary analogues (Ferrari et al. 2014). If the particle is too small to be detected by the GDS system, it may be detected by the IS sensor only (IS particles): in this case the particle momentum is converted to the mass assuming the mean value of the velocities of the GDS+IS particles in the same momentum bin, or assuming the velocities predicted by tail models (Fulle et al. 2010) if Ngds+is =0 in that mass bin. The spacecraft velocities listed in Table 1 are always much lower than the dust velocities measured by GIADA.
sorry bout the cut n paste3. PARTICLE CHARGEThe charge carried by a fluffy particle of radius R and equilibrium potential U iswhere is the vacuum permittivity, for spheres and for non-spherical or fluffy grains (Auer etal. 2007). The potential of the Rosetta spacecraft was measured at V (Nilsson et al. 2015). Weassume that this value was measured in the expected plasma density of m and energy of 100 eV.Dust charging models were computed taking into account currents provided by cold solar wind ions andelectrons, photoelectrons, coma electrons, and the secondary electrons induced by hot and cold plasmacomponents. These simulations (Figure 3) show that the dust equilibrium potential is set by the electroncollection current from the ambient plasma and by the secondary electron current emitted by the dust,which depends on the yield parameter (Mukai et al. 2001), for compact grains of olivineor graphite (Lin & Joy 2005; Balcon et al. 2012). The yield parameter decreases in time due to surfaceaging effects (Davies & Dennison 1997). In fluffy particles is lower than in compact grains
because most secondary electrons with an energy of a few eV are ejected toward other parts of the same particleand reabsorbed. Here we consider as a free parameter, and we fix its value according to the assumedplasma parameters and the measured U value.
DENSITY AND CHARGE OF PRISTINE FLUFFY PARTICLES FROM COMET67P/CHURYUMOV–GERASIMENKO
So maybe <1kgm-3 may be off
