The DJ and Gravy Thread for...

Blast from the past :) (I wasn't around here back then :p)

Just out of interest, did anyone ever publish a response to Gravy's critique?
I saw one addressing "Screw Loose Change", but it was hardly a debunking.

"Debunking of a debunking's" usually consist of:

a) "Why didn't you talk about this instead!" eg. CTist bringing up WTC7 in a section of a debunking that deals with the Pentagon.
b) "It's just so freaking obvious" eg. Saying WTC7 was a demolition regardless of what firefighters said... just because it's obvious.
c) A repetition of the already debunked argument.

The Loose Change Guide and the 9/11 Mysteries Guide (April 13th Release) debunk every point in these films. These "dunking of a debunking's" will only attack few points. For example, "Screw Screw Loose Change" only deals with the quick removal of steel, as opposed to "debunking" Marky's analysis of everything else to do with the WTC buildings.

So yeah... any attempt at "debunking loose change guide" out there? lol.
 
Cheers for the welcome. I normally don't like resurrecting threads but having read what, 140+ pages from a monster thread and getting to this spin off thread I had to take my frustration at his duplicity out somehow.

I still have about 150+ pages to go of that one thread. So please don't spoil the end for me, I'm sure that eventually one of the woo-swarm actually takes part in a real honest debate and is prepared to produce evidence backing up a single claim they make. I've still not seen about 100 of geggys posts for example, surely he made one factually correct statement...
 
Last edited:
Alan G said:
Cheers for the welcome. I normally don't like resurrecting threads but having read what, 140+ pages from a monster thread and getting to this spin off thread I had to take my frustration at his duplicity out somehow.

I still have about 150+ pages to go of that one thread. So please don't spoil the end for me, I'm sure that eventually one of the woo-swarm actually takes part in a real honest debate and is prepared to produce evidence backing up a single claim they make. I've still not seen about 100 of geggys posts for example, surely he made one factually correct statement...
Click to expand...
Erm...

How strong is your threshold for disappointment? :D
 
Alan G said:
Cheers for the welcome. I normally don't like resurrecting threads but having read what, 140+ pages from a monster thread and getting to this spin off thread I had to take my frustration at his duplicity out somehow.

I still have about 150+ pages to go of that one thread. So please don't spoil the end for me, I'm sure that eventually one of the woo-swarm actually takes part in a real honest debate and is prepared to produce evidence backing up a single claim they make. I've still not seen about 100 of geggys posts for example, surely he made one factually correct statement...
Click to expand...

:dl:


Don't immerse yourself too fully. You'll end up babbling in a padded room for the rest of your days if you absorb too much of this stuff at once...
 
i'll ruin it for you: it is discovered that geggy's brain is actually a blueberry muffin. all 911 CTers have different brain-muffins, or muffin-brains. lyte is a bananna nut muffin.

dylan is the only exception. his brain is actually a loaf.
 
OMGturt1es said:
i'll ruin it for you: it is discovered that geggy's brain is actually a blueberry muffin. all 911 CTers have different brain-muffins, or muffin-brains. lyte is a bananna nut muffin.

dylan is the only exception. his brain is actually a loaf.
Click to expand...
[style="homer simpson"]
mmmmm..... 9/11 CTer brains.... *drool*
[/style]
 
Mobyseven said:
:dl:


Don't immerse yourself too fully. You'll end up babbling in a padded room for the rest of your days if you absorb too much of this stuff at once...
Click to expand...

Yes, I really like thewallpaper here. it looks like tufted wool and keeps ssaying 3" coated rebar on 4' centers.

They are coming to take it away
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom