• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The complicity of several foreign intelligence agencies would have been required

dannyb said:
Anyone who has read the 9/11 Commission Report (i.e. not Truthers) will know that sources from several foreign intelligence agencies are used. Were it an 'inside job', it would mean that the same intelligence agencies would have been in on it or, at the very least, have agreed to allow the Commission to falsify citation on their behalf.
Click to expand...

So? Is it too hard for you to believe that the foreign intelligence agencies who work with and are allied with our own lying, criminal government would lie or allow someone to lie on their behalf?
 
Plattso said:
FBI biggest investigation- yes the one that culminated in "...no hard evidence
connecting Bin Laden to 9/11"
Click to expand...

And yet, others within his organization have been arrested, killed, or are wanted in connection to the events of 9/11.

Imagine that.

Plattso said:
Oystein: You mean like the BANG BANG BANG BANG described by that firefighter in the famous
firehouse coffee sipping video? Let's see...Louie Caecchioli. Oh, wait. That's BOOM
BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM. Maybe that doesn't count.
Click to expand...

Not when he clearly is discussing the collapse of the building, and not BEFORE the collapse.

But, that is slightly off topic.
 
dannyb said:
As I said in another thread, there is circumstantial evidence implicating the Saudi royals. If the 28-page redaction from Congress's Joint Enquiry is ever made public, it could be a game changer for American-Saudi relations.
Click to expand...

Are the Saudi royal family muslim?

That would fit in very well with the official narrative.

If they are not, it certainly throws a spanner into the works.
 
Don't go away.

000063: Please come back in the door. I was just making a lame joke. I'm not a no-planer. I'm seriously interested in the whole Truther vs Standard Model, duh, dialectic I guess you could call it, of the last several years. Its growth and development. Been reading some of these threads and now intrigued by this whole system of "debate". I should come up with an opening assertion ( I'll start a thread). Provide evidence. Counter your measly rebuttals. Then kick your logical asses. Yeah. First, I'll get some sleep.
 
Plattso said:
000063: Please come back in the door. I was just making a lame joke. I'm not a no-planer. I'm seriously interested in the whole Truther vs Standard Model, duh, dialectic I guess you could call it, of the last several years. Its growth and development. Been reading some of these threads and now intrigued by this whole system of "debate". I should come up with an opening assertion ( I'll start a thread). Provide evidence. Counter your measly rebuttals. Then kick your logical asses. Yeah. First, I'll get some sleep.
Click to expand...

Learn to use the quote function; it would come under the or what category before you kick everyone's logical asses, log it in under growth and development. So far the kick logical is like bringing a football to a baseball game, go out for a long one.


Not sure what you mean by CT-required complexity. It was a complex operation no matter who did it.
Click to expand...

19 terrorist, the most complex plot since Cain and Able.
1. Take planes
2. Crash planes
Wow, this is complex stuff. Very complex. Yep.

On the NOT SURE part. If 911 was an inside job, take your pick, share your own fantasy, would be less complex of course. Less steps, Right?
What is your fantasy, your need for another investigation?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom