Sam.I.Am
Illuminator
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2009
- Messages
- 4,627
Sounds like a normal Saturday night at the twinstead house
No midgets in gimp suits though...
Sounds like a normal Saturday night at the twinstead house
No midgets in gimp suits though...
MaGZ said:Only WTC 7 was a controlled demolition.
Ask the Fire Department as to how it was done.
Are you sure P'doh didn’t get that theory from me?
I have always maintained that was the reason WTC 7 was pulled, to enable search and rescue to continue at Ground Zero without the building collapsing onto the emergency personnel.
Your theory is absolutely ridiculous, IMO.
Whoa. A drive-by toofering.
That was the whole point of the OP after all...for you to explain the logistics, not just shoot and run..
Ask the Fire Department as to how it was done.
If this was true, there wouldn't be one lick of sense in covering it up. Someone would be very proudly announcing that they did that job so fast and clean, and they'd be very right to announce it loudly and proudly. And no one in the world would object: Not Silverstein, not his insurers, not the government, not the first responders, not no-one.
88 Ninjas, 27 crates of Hush-A-Boom, a delivery truck disguised as an Oscar Meyer Weinermobile and a keg of Bud Light.
Are you sure P'doh didn’t get that theory from me?
I have always maintained that was the reason WTC 7 was pulled, to enable search and rescue to continue at Ground Zero without the building collapsing onto the emergency personnel.
Only WTC 7 was a controlled demolition.
Ask the Fire Department as to how it was done.
Only WTC 7 was a controlled demolition.
Ask the Fire Department as to how it was done.
Since when does any fire department anywhere do controlled demolitions?
Are you sure P'doh didn’t get that theory from me?
I have always maintained that was the reason WTC 7 was pulled, to enable search and rescue to continue at Ground Zero without the building collapsing onto the emergency personnel.