Who be moron, child? Bush Sr. used the term to refer to Reaganomics. Don't you understand that? You and the smartest poster on the forums are totally clueless when it comes to easily google-able facts.
Reagan never used the term. Understand???? George HW Bush used it to describe Reagan's variation on Supply-Side Economics. Do you know what Supply-Side Economics means? Do you know who George HW Bush was? Do you know who Keynes was? Do you know what time it is? Can you count change if someone asks you to break a five? Where am I?
ETA: I was responding to post # 1145, for which, I'm sad to say, da yoof of the thread has been warned.... OMG, now I'm responding to "warned behaviour"! What will I come to?
Yes i already know this, but thank you for the useless explanation. I dont feel the need to fully explain the fact that i was just acknowledging what Dash was talking about. You seem to be stuck on explaining this when everyone already knows what it is and was.
MAy i ask why???
Whats was the point in explaining what VooDoo Economics was, and then beating your chest like you are winning some sort of debate on the topic?
As quoted by you:
"Bush Sr. used the term to refer to Reaganomics"
Reaganomics had to do with which president might i ask?
After you answer that proceed to next question.
So would it not be accurate to state that "Voodoo Economics" had something to do with Reagan?
This is all i claimed it to be? You seemed to be stressing the fact that i was wrong. Yet are failing to tell me what i claimed?
When you can tell me the claim i made in order to be wrong on the topic, then I will bow out of the conversation and acknowledge your intellectual dominance over me.
You will not be able to point to a claim because i did not make any regarding "VooDoo Economics" and what it actually was. My only claim was that i already knew it had to do with Reagan.
Your posts seem to be rather pointless attacks on individuals with arguments you are making up in your head.
I have to always repeat myself when i shouldnt because it is a ****ing forum and you can go back and read what i wrote over and over until you get the point, but here i go again....
I NEVER STATED ANYTHING ABOUT "VOODOO ECONOMICS" THAT I COULD BE WRONG ABOUT. THUS MAKING THE ENTIRE POST I HAVE QUOTED A MADE UP ARGUMENT BETWEEN YOU AND I.
Does anyone else not notice this silliness or can someone here find where i stated something wrong about the topic?
Rather my only statement was that i knew what it was.
Is their a name for this tactic used in debating because i have never come across something so mind numbing?