Oliver said:From what I know
[bolding mine]Well, my argument would be that the Government
punishes people who rip off uninformed people, especially elderly ones who don't know what Bit and Ram is all about.
Haha Louisiana. Pinnacle of sanity right there. Not saying that to Undermine Paul, saying it to undermine LA.
The platform is based on being pro-life, and they choose MCCAIN 1st? What the hell, he's like the only candidate not saying he'll overturn R v W. Seriously, Louisiana is so backwater...
So, wonder how the numbers will turn out, RP has done well in the two places known for being the great American Sin Cities(Las Vegas and formerly New Orleans), not to mention you probably have a lot of people plenty pissed with "the man" after Katrina, so Paul's talk may have hit close to home for the LA folk. Anyway, can't wait to see the official counts.
Wow! What a load of stereotypical tripe this post is!?!?
You are a sick sick person!
Coward. One of the best ways to show a lack of backbone is to trumpet about the "I have you on ignore" crap.No worries. I don't even care what your example is, welcome to ignore.
Coward. One of the best ways to show a lack of backbone is to trumpet about the "I have you on ignore" crap.
Show your own dick some respect, will you?
DR
Wasn't talking about them.![]()
Yeah, let's get excited about a "second place" finish in a state that would have chosen the guy who realized Louisiana means nothing and dropped out the day before.10,000 voters participated, and most of them voted for "pro-life uncommitted". So of the 4500 (guestimate) or so left, McCain got probably 2500. I bet Ron Paul got ~1700 votes today.
If you weren't talking about WooCat, then you lost me. Feel free to reread the thread.
I did. And until you, JdG and Oliver stop ignoring counterarguments, using fallacies to rebut facts and outright ignoring posts?
I deem thee a troll.
From the SA forums. A pretty good case. By the way, voting against civil rights does make you a racist. And not believing gays should have the same benefits is homophobic. The bastard is as much a collectivist as anyone else.
I did. And until you, JdG and Oliver stop ignoring counterarguments, using fallacies to rebut facts and outright ignoring posts?
I deem thee a troll.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3361721&postcount=62
Ignored statement. Too much reading, I guess. Neither JdG nor Oliver even seemed to glance at it.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3361721&postcount=62
Ignored statement. Too much reading, I guess. Neither JdG nor Oliver even seemed to glance at it.
This is the extent of your content in that post:
racist
homophobic
bastard
I think that you and I define content differently.
Jerome: Those links actually back them up. Because that IS content. Ofcourse, if you want to ignore it..