• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The "Carlos Swett affair"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Junior,

I can help with the translation, Swettish is now almost a second language for many of us. :D Typically, it is an insult. carlos is implying that you must not have much of a life outside of the forum if mockering him is so much fun for you. The same could be said of the time he spends here but he's not bright enough to understand the concept of hypocricy. :rolleyes: Hope this helps.
 
Junior Bidlack said:
Swett, i am not quite sure what you mean by that, i think you lost a bit in translation. But don't worry, just try agian, i just wouldn't recomend using one of those online tranlsators.
Click to expand...

Junior:

Just a recomendation: NEVER (Iam not shouting , just an emphasis) never use an online translator . They really don't work . Maybe Harter or your Daddy used one of those translators. with my notaryzed application, and that's why they lost with me.

Look at Skeptoid, he seems that he really understand my quote with no difficult at all. Was easy , you just needed to be just a little more "free" in your mind. Must be hard to have a daddy militar and also the administrator of this forum. You were educated to obey the "no matter what" reason. Is not really your fault.

Are you happy now?
And Randi is still on silence , and your daddy and his sock puppets must be proud of that. And you?
Are you also with his permission to just bla bla bla.
Look yourself at the same mirror of Blue Monk, poor unhappy , used guy. But remember , you have the chance to keep on posting.

Thanks,

S&S

P.S.

Say hello to daddy.
 
latinijral said:
Carlos:

Why Junior hate you and consider you like an enemy?
Click to expand...

Hi latinijral:

I will leave the assumptions to Harter.

Maybe Junior can answer you that question.
I don't hate him and I don't consider him my enemy. This is not a war or a fight, and you need at least 2 persons to do that. I am out. I am just debating here(when is possible) with people that wants to debate.

Are you preparing the cake? Is almost a year of Randi's silence.
His clock is ticking.

Thanks,
S&S
 
I don't hate you dude. I just like messing with you. Don't feel bad, i am only 1/2 serious when i call you names and such.
 
Junior Bidlack said:
I don't hate you dude. I just like messing with you. Don't feel bad, i am only 1/2 serious when i call you names and such.
Click to expand...

Hi Junior:

I had that assumption in my mind. Sometimes words you posted like "my enemy" distracted me a little.
Now that you are man enough to clarify the point, is ok to me.

Listen: Don't call names, the administrator moved some threads I created before only with that excuse. And I was not the one,
where some fans of a cult.


Thanks,
S&S
 
Happy First Anniversary James Randi !!!!!!!.........of being in silence.

Thanks,

S&S
 
Junior Bidlack said:
Doesn't that also mean that you have spent a year of your life ranting about a picture of a bird.
Click to expand...

Hi Junior:

Would you prefer a spoon?
Or a dowser?
What is your favorite "smart" subject?

Take a piece of cake. Is free.

And he is still on silence.

Thanks,
S&S

P.S.
Support the sock puppet.
 
Now, I'm new to this whole thread, but I scanned the first page today to get the gist. I'm sure this question has been asked of Carlos since there are now 42 pages in this thread, but I'll ask anyways.

If this tape you have is indeed so amazing and worthy of a million dollars from James Randi, why haven't you taken it to major networks and had them air it. Wouldn't CNN be interested in something so incredible? Have you approached any media outlets at all?
I also think that issues of national security might be relevant here as well. Have you offered your theories up to the FBI so they can get to the bottom of this occurance?

Surely the JREF isn't the only place in the world where your amazing discovery can be showcased. If this is your only hope for recognition, then the validity of your claim must be questioned.
Why don't you shop this tape of yours around, garner worldwide attention, and then come back here and shove it all in our faces. Think how ashamed and apologetic everyone at this forum will be when your tape is being aired all over the world, and you are being heralded as a brilliant mind who exposed paranormal activities at the WTC.

Anytime someone comes to this board with an "amazing discovery", I'm always stunned that they never pursue other outlets for exposure of their claim. Hmmm, I wonder why that is?
 
KelvinG said:
Now, I'm new to this whole thread, but I scanned the first page today to get the gist. I'm sure this question has been asked of Carlos since there are now 42 pages in this thread, but I'll ask anyways.

If this tape you have is indeed so amazing and worthy of a million dollars from James Randi, why haven't you taken it to major networks and had them air it. Wouldn't CNN be interested in something so incredible? Have you approached any media outlets at all?
I also think that issues of national security might be relevant here as well. Have you offered your theories up to the FBI so they can get to the bottom of this occurance?

Surely the JREF isn't the only place in the world where your amazing discovery can be showcased. If this is your only hope for recognition, then the validity of your claim must be questioned.
Why don't you shop this tape of yours around, garner worldwide attention, and then come back here and shove it all in our faces. Think how ashamed and apologetic everyone at this forum will be when your tape is being aired all over the world, and you are being heralded as a brilliant mind who exposed paranormal activities at the WTC.

Anytime someone comes to this board with an "amazing discovery", I'm always stunned that they never pursue other outlets for exposure of their claim. Hmmm, I wonder why that is?
Click to expand...

Hi Kelving G:

I will assume you trust media.
I will assume you trust FBI.CIA and your president
I will assume you trusted U.Geller before.
I will assume you trust S. Browne because is on the media.

But I am sure that you trust Randi.
For me would me more easy, remunerable , etc. to do what you said.
I just wanted a fear , scientific , impartial analysis.
You need to read a little more , or read my signature.
Or read Randi's commentaries what are about.

Thanks,
S&S

P.S.
Edited to put my signature.
 
New guy,
Don't try to use logic on this thread, it doesn't work. The best idea is to simply attack Swett, it doesn't really accomplish anything, but it is fun
 
Junior Bidlack said:
New guy,
Don't try to use logic on this thread, it doesn't work. The best idea is to simply attack Swett, it doesn't really accomplish anything, but it is fun
Click to expand...

Hi Junior :

Will you please define the word "attack".

You mean the "no matter what reason".?
KelvinG has most posts than you. You are the new guy.
You have a mission here.
But try to be more ...... you know what I mean.

Or keep on having "fun".

Thanks,
S&S
 
Carlos: Have you stopped lately t owonder why Randi is "in silence", that is, he is ignoring you?

You made a claim, and it was rejected.

Thats it, finito, end of story. Unless you present new evidence, nothing more will happen.

Hans
 
Hey I once saw something I couldn't explain. In fact no one can completely explain it! And everyone see's it every single day.

Go outside and drop something and it *magically* falls to the ground!!! I've heard that this *magic* is called gravity!

WHERE THE HELL IS MY MILLION DOLLARS RANDI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

my application
has been delievered safely
i want my money



KA-CHING!
 
MRC_Hans said:
Carlos: Have you stopped lately t owonder why Randi is "in silence", that is, he is ignoring you?

You made a claim, and it was rejected.

Thats it, finito, end of story. Unless you present new evidence, nothing more will happen.

Hans
Click to expand...

Yes I know Randi is ignoring me.

The claim was rejected (?) because Harter did a poor and silly (? members wrote that silly is not an insult) job analyzing the tape and some mistakes in his answer by e-mail to my appliaction.

That's why Randi is still on silence. He knows they did a mistake,
and some members too. Read my signature.

Thanks,
S&S
 
Carlos and S&S are the same person?

HOW DO WE KNOW THAT?

S&S why should I believe that you are really Carlos and not a trouble maker from Brazili?
 
Rusty_the_boy_robot said:
Carlos and S&S are the same person?

HOW DO WE KNOW THAT?

S&S why should I believe that you are really Carlos and not a trouble maker from Brazili?
Click to expand...

Hi Rusty:

Please don't shout. my dog is sleeping.
Here are some tips:

A) go to the first page of this thread.

B) Read Linda's post. She is a member of the JREF and administrator of this forum.

C) then read my first post in this forum.

If you still have some troubles I will give you another tips.
I am from Ecuador.

And Randi is still on silence.

Thanks,
S&S
 
Originally posted by Linda 08-27-2002 05:55 PM

Interesting.....Sr. Swett just registered for the message boards today. I expect we'll be hearing from him.
Click to expand...

My first post:
Originally posted by S&S 08-29-2002 10:38 PM

Hi.everybody I am Swett
Click to expand...

Nothing to hide, Nothing to be afraid of.

But , Randi is hiding something : Harter's poor and .....job.

Thanks,
S&S
 
S&S said:


Yes I know Randi is ignoring me.

The claim was rejected (?) because Harter did a poor and silly (? members wrote that silly is not an insult) job analyzing the tape and some mistakes in his answer by e-mail to my appliaction.

That's why Randi is still on silence. He knows they did a mistake,
and some members too. Read my signature.

Thanks,
S&S
Click to expand...
No. The reason your claim was rejected is that it does not fulfil the requirements of the JREF challenge: Your observation cannot be tested.

Further, even a superficial examination indicated that there was nothing extraordinary about the object you found on the video. However, it is not the duty of JREF to prove or disprove your claim, that is YOUR duty.

After your claim being rejected, the film has been examined in detail by lots of people, including myself. Any new evidence discovered in this process has only served to further weaken your case.

I have asked these questions before, and you have ignored them or double-talked about them. Maybe this time you will be man enough to give straight answers:

1) How do you explain that the object is only visible on that particular video? There exist a dozen other videos and many stills of that fateful moment; none of them show your object. Why?

2) What is you comment to the fact that another video clearly shows birds flying in that particular area at exactly the right moment?

3) Even if the vido should show something extraordinary (apart from a plane hitting WTC), how can this ever be YOUR claim? Somebody owns that video, how do you explain that YOU are filing the claim? Is that not an attempt to steal another man's claim?

Hans
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom