subgenius said:
Only someone mentally ill or malicious would continue to assert otherwise.
Which do you think it is?
I vote Mentally Ill, in which case, this rant will never end.
Good guess but I believe you are wrong.
Carlos and latinijral never post anything in its entirety. They will post frames but never ALL the frames. To understand these guys you have to look at what they don't show.
They post only what they feel supports their view and they avoid the other evidence with surgical precision. This indicates that they are quite aware of where their claim falls apart.
It's no accident that they will not post the frames that look like a bird flapping it's wings.
It's no accident that they try to change the subject when the discussion veers into uncomfortable territory.
It is no accident that they try to claim I faked evidence by posting a bunch of nonsensical doctored Photoshop documents when, if the charge were true, they could easily prove by simply making their version of the tape available for us to view, which Carlos has repeatedly refused to do.
They have shown time and time again that they are quite aware of the flaws in their argument by very conspicuously withholding that information.
This indicates that they are not delusional but rather simply dishonest.
Carlos has an agenda. It is to get mentioned in Randi's commentary.
Once you understand Carlos' agenda, whatever his motivation may be, everything he has said and done up till now makes perfect sense.
He does not believe this nonsense himself. He probably did at one time but his precise avoidance of such obvious evidence to the contrary clearly indicates that this is no longer true. It is merely a device to get his name in Randi's commentary.
The good news is that this will no doubt provide me with countless hours of entertainment. I do hope you will enjoy the show.
And be sure to visit my daily updated site
Creeps who exploit tragedies
Oh and if you really want to have some fun try the new game I've invented called the Carlos game. You start by asking Carlos a pointed question. The question must be fair, something that can be answered concerning his claim and something that anyone who was honestly trying to promote his claim would have no problem in answering.
Some examples.
1) Carlos, how do you explain the fact that there is no object in any other videos?
2) Carlos, isn't the object in your video out of focus, exactly as one would expect if it were a bird at closer range?
3) Carlos, if you claim Blue Monk faked his video clips are you willing to make copies of your tape available for comparison like he is?
He will try to change the subject, ignore it, or answer with another question.
The goal of the game is to see who can ask Carlos a reasonable question (it must be reasonable to be fair) and then count the number of times he refuses to answer it.
The person that gets ignored the greater number of times wins!
It will soon become clear that Carlo's problem is not reality, it's honesty.
