• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged The Cain exposé / 4th woman jumps on the Cain train

BTW, MaGZ' OP was more or less operating under the assumption that the story was leaked by someone with an interest in the demise of Cain's campaign. That point of view is actually consistent with the allegations (and leaking of them to the press) being part of a smear campaign.

So again, your evidence that those of us participating in the thread believe the unspecified allegations to be true? Even more difficult, your evidence that we have that belief (I certainly don't) because Cain is black?
 
So, is it possible that whoever released this information was, in fact, concerned that such a creep would get to be president?
 
Or alturnatively thought that they would finaly get heard.
 

Quote from the above:

She said Cain told her that he had confided to colleagues how attractive she was and invited her to his corporate apartment outside work.

His actions “were inappropriate, and it made me feel uncomfortable,” she said.
OMG. How can men get away with things like this? :scared:
 
Cain is beginning to annoy some on the right by playing the race card:

Cain’s noxious racial politics

His super PAC sent out a fundraising appeal with this plea: “Herman Cain is winning the Republican race for President. So the left-wing media has swung into action. Just like they did to Clarence Thomas, they are engaging in a ‘high tech lynching’ by smearing Herman Cain’s reputation and character.” That charge was repeated by conservative celebrities ranging from Rush Limbaugh to Ann Coulter.
. . .
This is reprehensible, the sort of racial inflammation that, when practiced by the left, infuriates conservatives. Who is he accusing of racism — the Politico reporters? The women who made the claims in the 1990s? The media for covering allegations that he admitted were true (e.g., his employer settled at least one sexual harassment claim)?

Cain and his defenders, like actors in a theatrical tragedy, are falling prey to the very evil they labored against: the propensity to assign political identity by race and to invoke race to shield one from personal responsibility. Cain is in trouble because he didn’t handle a past claim that even a political novice would know would come to light.

BTW, I would hard call Politico a "left-wing" operation. If anything I get the overall impression of a center-right bias. They go after scandals involving democrats with at least equal zeal, and they bent over backwards to give the Cain campaign time to respond to the story (10 days) before going public with it.
 
I thought y'all were skeptics? And maybe wait at least 24 hours before you allow anecdotes to tickle your confirmation bias?

Carry on.

So far I've only seen one person in this thread not act skeptical.

Or are you leaping to the conclusion that we accept every allegation of sexual harassment as being true?
Yes, when it involves black conservatives.
That takes some big black walnuts.
 
Seems like Perry at the moment. It could always be someone else or even someone not connected to any candidate but with a grudge against Cain. Though if that was the case you would think this would have come out much sooner and not at the moment where Cain takes the lead in most polls. It just seems all too convenient that this comes out now and one of the potential leekers joined Perrys campaign at almost exactly the same time Politico started this "investigation"/"expose". And despite anything that comes of this it won't help Perry in the end. He doesn't have a chance.
 
It was bound to come out sooner or later. So maybe it was Cain himself? Bring it out when he is on top and can possibly just dismiss it.
 
How long before the National Restaurant Association gets tired of the negative publicity this is generating for them and they throw Cain under the bus?

You have to figure that there are restaurant owners out there that are reconsiddering their membership in the association right now.
 
How long before the National Restaurant Association gets tired of the negative publicity this is generating for them and they throw Cain under the bus?

You have to figure that there are restaurant owners out there that are reconsiddering their membership in the association right now.

You could be right. In my limited experience working in restaurants, they have to have one of the highest rates of sexual harassment of any industry. I don't think they want that pandora's box opened.
 
You could be right. In my limited experience working in restaurants, they have to have one of the highest rates of sexual harassment of any industry. I don't think they want that pandora's box opened.

Kitchen Confidential. ;)
 
To those of you who think that it is all about race and that it is an attack on a black man who dares to stick his head up over the wall, remember that we now have a black, Democratic president and that we threw a white, liberal front-runner for the presidency under the bus when his sexual misconduct became known.

Republicons and their radio meat puppets have the moral standards of three-card monte artists and assume that we have the span of houseflies.
 
Perry isn't clever enough to cover all the bases of deniability. I see the Cain attack as a Karl Rove operation.
 
Last edited:
Perry isn't clever enough to cover all the bases of denial. I see the Cain attack as a Karl Rove operation.
Perry is a dimbulb, but the, so was Bush the Lesser. Staffers had to do a lot of the real crerative work.

One of Perry's staffers was highly-placed within the restruant association when the harrassment issue was being handled.

Not a great leap of logic here.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom