Ruby said:
Hi!
Some of the questions that my hubby and I wrestle with are things like, "How can the world come into being without a Creator".? While we can no longer believe in a personal God, we just can't fathom the Universe forming all by itself. However, this creates another dilemna because if we have to believe in a Creator, we have to ask why he is absent from people's lives. Why does he not make his presence clear and help us in our daily lives.
Watch out for the people who say "The universe didnt just 'create' itself", they usually have a poor understanding of the beginnings of the universe, and somehow they tend to conclude "Well, the universe didnt just make itself, therefore proving creationism" (Thats a very common form of Flawed Logic).
(Someone correct me if I'm wrong, I dont know my early universe theorems like I should...) One of the things I've always considered was the First Law of Quantum Mechanics (It might be the first, it might be another... I've forgotten). The First Law Of Quantum Mechanics states something along the lines of "Energy can spontaneously arise from a vacuum". It sounds like it should be breaking the First Law of Thermodynamics, not
quite. The Laws of Quantum Mechanics are
Quantum Physics, the Laws of Thermodynamics are
Newtonian Physics. But, I dont consider myself near qualified enough to answer the question, so dont quote me on it.
I have a book on Quantum Mechanics in the library downstairs, I'll see what I can fish out of it.
And if anything, we simply dont know how the universe came about, and it would be irresponsible and ignorant of use to try to invent a random fact like "God made the Big Bang happen" to explain unknown phenomena such as the Big Bang. (Keep in mind, there are other scientifically sound theories, not just the Big Bang.)
I realize that many Christians would say that God does help, heal, and rescue...........but as we all know...for every person who is healed or rescued, a thousand are not!! What sort of God is that?
No worries. People have survived every kind of cancer, accident, natural disastor, disease, and war that has ever happened. They just "survive", we dont need to invent something like "God let them survive", its not good to try to apply miraculous claims to clearly unremarkable events.
So, how do you see the universe coming into being without a creator? And if you think there was a Creator, why is he absent?
I stand by a few philosophies (being a Philosopher and all...): All things in the universe can be explained in terms of matter and natural phenomena, nothing in the universe can escape the laws of physics. Anything that does not hold true to those 2 criteria cannot and do not exist.
God has been recorded as performing events that exist outside of Physics, God himself (as an entity) cannot be explained in terms of matter. Using my Philosophizing, God doesnt exist.
Finally, to answer the question, the universe came about the way it did naturally, no deity required (not like one could exist in the first place).
What sort of proof is there for a big bang? What about the age of the earth............how is the conclusion reached that it's very very old. How do Christians argue that away?
I dont know enough, nor do I consider myself qualified enough to answer the first question.
But, you have to remember, the Big Bang is a theory. In this case, The Big Bang theory is a large collection of widely accepted facts and laws to explain the formation of the universe.
The age of the earth is about 4.55 billion years old (+/- 1% or so).
We reach the conclusion that the earth is very old first via common sense. Its absurd to believe the earth isnt very old (Evolution is a very slow process, the formation of planets is a very slow process, the oldest rocks have been dated to be 3.8 billion years old and minimally you would expect the earth to be at least as old as the rocks formed on it). Second, we use U-235 and Pb-207 somehow or another to help us determine the age of the Earth. The number 4.55 billion wasnt just pulled out of the air, unfortunately again I dont consider myself qualified enough to answer it.
Christian apologetists have a habit of making of their own science to favor their own beliefs. For instance, I'm sure you've heard the absurd "dust that has accumulated on the moon" theory, it supposedly disproves Old Earth theories... yeah, only if accept pseudoscience as a means of reasoning. The most you can possibly get out of pseudoscience is "vaguely sounding scientifical".
How can we be certain we descended from apes. I was always told that some of the ape findings were planted and the others were skeletal remains of Orangutans or other apes.
"If humans came from monkeys, why are there still monkeys" is a very common misconception. Evolution does not state nor imply monkeys evolved into humans, it states Humans and Apes have a common ancestor.
Take a real life example: If you have a kitty that has a litter of kittens, all the kittens have 2 direct common ancestors. Creationists have this confused with "The mommy cat evolved into the younger kittens" (do ya see what I mean... because I dont

... )
Sorry for all the questions. I am just at a place where I need the whole picture......not just what Christian apologetics has spouted off.
Thanks!!!!!
