• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

The Bicycle Rider Proves 9-11 Was An Inside Job!

Brainster

Penultimate Amazing
Brainster
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
22,306
This has to take the cake for the silliest bit of "evidence" offered up by the Troofers yet:



It's somewhat reminiscent of the claims that you can see the metal bars through one of the 7/7 London Tube bombers.

The person who posted this is a no-planer; here's another of his videos:



Gee, what are we to make of the fact that a woman who had just come out of the subway, south of the World Trade Center, did not hear Flight 11 coming from the north of the World Trade Center?
 
Doodz! Know whey this bike can b real. Hez on an entrance ramp - bykes arnt allowed on teh highway!!!
 
Yes thatever will we make of this woman who had not good reason to look up at the towers, be looking up at hte towers.

And if you missed those few seconds when the plane approached and hit... you would not have seen a plane.


Also about there not being a fire engine on the scene for minutes... as I posted on the video... we know there was one there within seconds... because there was a documentary crew that filmed the first planew.

But of course that was faked, and all the footage of them approaching and going in was faked.
 
i dont know about the evidence, but i found the same techno beat loops that are in every no planer vid to be very convincing
 
My favorite are the morons who comment about researching 9-11 making it to where they can't enjoy special effects movies anymore on the comment board for the video.

Well the video is stupid. I am not even going to comment on the, "The bike is riding on the rail" nonsense. The whole thing about being able to see the lines through the arms and legs, when slowing the video down, is easy to explain. It is the result of interlaced video. Odds and Evens mix, but sometimes with fast moving, thin background objects you end up seeing a little bit through them in slow motion.

Which brings me back the first statment, why do people listen the the ramblings of folks who are ignorant of the basic function of video when they are claiming to have evidence of fakery?
 
Last edited:
Moreover, she was in Battery Park, facing the South Face of WTC1. The plane came in from the north and struck the North Face. So people in the vicinity would not have seen the plane (its approach blocked the towers themselves) and there was no plane-sized hole visible from their vantage point. I'm not even sure if they could have heard the approach of the plane down in Battery Park, as those up near Canal Street did (as captured in the Naudet video).
 
The truther nut complains cant hear any sirens - from her location responding fire/EMS
equipment would be coming from Brooklyn via the Battery tunnel. Would not hear
sirens until exiting the tunnels.

Question - Why doesn't You tube have an IQ test before posting a video?
 
And how does this video have to do with 9/11? The only connection I can get from this is the guy worked at the pentagon on 9/11. Are they trying to say his statement was faked because the bike had no shadow? That is honestly absurd and whoever did that should be involuntarily committed to keep the public safe.
 
WOW!
I must say did you see how tiny that Cyclist looked compared to the rest of the scenery?
Also did you notice how he seemed to drive right through the ear of the guy they were interviewing and he didn't even flinch?
GEEZ the NWO seems to be developing some advanced technology!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom