Why does something tell me that Radrook believes all atheists are "satanically inspired" and he's just arguing with them to strengthen his own position. I have a strong feeling that anything that disagrees with his god-beliefs gets labeled "satanic" by him. It is a pretty easy "out", after all -- sort of a flip-side to "goddidit".
Part of the teachings of the Watchtower is the warnings against apostate literature and apostate thought, which is why Radrook is so swift with the ignore button. The JWs honestly believe that contact with seriously dissenting views is diabolic.
In direct reference to your question I refer you to this quote from the Watchtower Magazine, the unquestionable doctrinal word of the Watchtower organisation aka the Jehovah's Witnesses (quoted at
http://www.spotlightministries.org.uk/thoughtpolice.htm) :
""How could one become guilty of partaking of the table of demons in our day? By serving the interests of anything opposed to Jehovah. The table of demons includes all demonic propaganda, which is designed to mislead and to turn us away from Jehovah. Who would want to feed his heart and mind on such poison?"
(The Watchtower; July 1, 1994, p. 9)."
There's more on that site discussing the views of JWs to critical thinking
in general:
"
The Watchtower's View of Independent Thinking Amongst Jehovah's Witnesses
Despite its criticisms of the Catholic Church there are clearly double standards in view as to the issue of independent thinking. The Watchtower Society condemns others for stifling free thought, when they themselves are guilty of doing the same to their members. The following quotes from Watchtower sources demonstrate this:
"[A] mature Christian must be in unity and full harmony with fellow believers as far as faith and knowledge are concerned. He does not advocate or insist on personal opinions or harbour private ideas when it comes to Bible understanding. Rather, he has complete confidence in the truth as it is revealed by Jehovah God through his Son, Jesus Christ, and "the faithful and discreet slave." (Watchtower, August 1st, 2001, p. 14).
"In the world, there is a tendency to reject leadership. As one lecturer said: "The rising education level has improved the talent pool such that followers have become so critical that they are almost impossible to lead." But a spirit of independent thinking does not prevail in God's organization, and we have sound reasons for confidence in the men taking the lead among us." (The Watchtower, September 15, 1989, p. 23, 13).
"Avoid independent thinking...questioning the counsel that is provided by God's visible organization." (Watchtower, Jan. 15, 1983 p. 22).
"And just as in the first century there was only one true Christian organization, so today Jehovah is using only one organization. (Ephesians 4:4, 5; Matthew 24:45-47) Yet there are some who point out that the organization has had to make adjustments before, and so they argue: 'This shows that we have to make up our own mind on what to believe.' This is independent thinking. Why is it so dangerous? Such thinking is an evidence of pride. And the Bible says: 'Pride is before a crash, and a haughty spirit before stumbling.' (Proverbs 16:18) If we get to thinking that we know better than the organization, we should ask ourselves: 'Where did we learn Bible truth in the first place? Would we know the way of the truth if it had not been for guidance from the organization? Really, can we get along without the direction of God's organization?' No, we cannot!.. Fight against independent thinking." (Watchtower, January 15, 1983 p. 27).
"The student must express himself as he understands the truth. (Gal. 6:6) He cannot have independent thinking."(The Watchtower, September 1, 1962, p. 524)
Obviousely, because the Watchtower discourages its members to think independently, any individual Jehovah’s Witnesses who begins to formulate their own views and interpretations of doctrine and faith, even in small areas, are greatly frowned upon. The writer of this present article personally knows of some Jehovah’s Witnesses who differ with the Watchtower organisation in some areas of belief, but would not dare make this known to others in the organisation for fear of reprisals.
Even so, Jehovah’s Witnesses, who do hold some secret independent views may argue that even though the Watchtower does not permit them to have personal opinions in matters of belief, neither do many churches. There is some truth here but the parallel is a poor one. Even though a Christian Church may not tolerate someone who actively, and consciously, objected to
major doctrines (for example, the Trinity, the Deity of Christ, the Personhood of the Holy Spirit, or that salvation was in Christ alone, etc.), they would not have any problems with a person who disagreed on
minor issues (such as whether a person should speak in tongues or not, whether the return of Christ is at the beginning of the tribulation, the middle, or the end, etc.). Such things often considered by the majority of churches to be secondary issues. However, in the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, the average Jehovah’s Witness is expected to conform to
every doctrine, even those in which one would expect some sort of flexibility and individuality of conscience. Those who would even harbour private views at odds with the Watchtower’s teachings, let alone actively making their views made public, are simply not tolerated. So the key difference is this: In a Christian church there is some room for flexibility of difference of opinion in minor areas of doctrine. But among Jehovah’s Witnesses all members are expected to conform to every doctrine and teaching be it major or minor."
idea what it says? Amazing!!!