The 9/11 Mystery Plane

Troofers dearly love these "mysteries" for which they know no one can answer with authority. The flying schedule for any USAF combat asset is not published anywhere for public consumption. More so, the E4B is a sensitive platform for which the USAF will not publish any information other than general generic stuff such as that it does exist. That's all of the information that will be published regardless of the number of troofer's that imply that it had some nefarious purpose regarding 9/11.

It's quite obvious that it was at Andrews for one of the NORAD exercises, probably Global Guardian. That exercise was a Command level Command Post Exercise (CPX) so logically an E4B would be involved. It is a COMMUNICATIONS PLATFORM, not necessarily an advanced electronics platform that is suggested by the idiot writing a book. There is a huge difference.

Another issue is that the photos do not prove it was in prohibited airspace at all. P-56 is quite small and covers only the White House and Capitol area. Besides the fact that it is not so uncommon that the airspace is violated periodically anyway.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/04/03/national/main505323.shtml

The issue of the E4B is really a non-issue to anyone besides a troofer. They will continue to exploit it, adding mystery and intrigue forever simply because it is one of the few elements which they know no one will ever answer authoritatively.
 
doobiedoright said:
Seems to me with the issues of transponders and all .Putting one of those baby's in the air is a very prudent thing to do......no?
Click to expand...

Please don't confuse an E4B with an AWACS. They are two different platforms used for different purposes.

The E4B is a communications platform, whereas the AWACS is essentially a Radar platform and would have the ability to interrogate a transponder. The E4B would not have that capability.
 
Caustic Logic said:
"Ambiguous blending," faked radar, etc... In other words, Twoofer BS. I don't think that's Gaffney's case, but Farmer sorta suggested it recently, and he's been consulting on the book.
Click to expand...
The book has a forward written by David Ray Griffin, looks like truther BS through and through.
 
Here is the official fact sheet on the E-4B:
http://www.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?fsID=99

From the fact sheet:
Mission
The E-4B serves as the National Airborne Operations Center for the president, secretary of defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff or JCS. In case of national emergency or destruction of ground command control centers, the aircraft provides a highly survivable, command, control and communications center to direct U.S. forces, execute emergency war orders and coordinate actions by civil authorities.
Click to expand...
The bolded text explains why an aircraft like the E-4B would and should be ordered into the air as consequence of the september 11th attacks.

Here is a lengthy Wikipedia entry on the E4-B and its role:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-4B

From the Wikipedia article:
On September 11, 2001, an aircraft closely resembling an E-4B was spotted orbiting the Washington D.C. area by news outlets and citizens, during the attack on the Pentagon. This aircraft sighting has added fuel to the continued speculation and debate concerning the 9-11 attacks.[3] In his book "Black Ice" author Dan Verton identifies this aircraft as an E-4B taking part in the 2001 operational exercise "Global Guardian". The exercise was cancelled when the first plane struck the World Trade Center, and the E-4B which was waiting on the tarmac at Andrews AFB in Washington D.C. immediately took off, and was seen circling the Nation's Capital at low altitude during the attack on the Pentagon.
Click to expand...


It looks like all four E-4B's were ordered into the air on september 11th, if we can trust the authors use of sources in this article that got a truther twist:
http://www.huliq.com/34171/new-details-about-the-9-11-mystery-jet-plane

What the author does not get is that there is no mystery in the fact that the E4-Bs were in the air on september 11th. It would have been the opposite that would have called for questions. That would have been why wasn't an asset like the E4-B, designed to ensure continuation of command and control, not put into action in a situation where the nation were under an attack of unknown size and extent.
 
Presenting hard evidence in the form of proprietary photos taken from raw footage filmed by CNN.
Click to expand...
Wait, I thought the CNN were in on it and had faked all of the footage from that day? :boggled:
 
The clue to why the E-4Bs were in the air is that after the close of the Cold War there wasn't as much of a use for the four aircraft. One is kept at Andrews AFB on stand by, but the other three are routinely seconded to FEMA for managing disaster relief. I suspect that with the E-4Bs ready to fly for the Guardian exercises, FEMA grabbed control of them to oversee disaster relief in Washington and New York.

And just to reiterate some facts others have pointed out:

-The E-4B is a communications platform not a surveillance platform
-The aircraft took off after the Pentagon was hit
-If the "bad guys" wanted a secret bunker to control the attack from it wouldn't be a friggen modified 747 flying directly over the targets that were hit by other aircraft
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom