• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The 9/11 Mystery Plane

zorro99

Graduate Poster
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Messages
1,547
The 9/11 Mystery Plane: And The Vanishing of America (Paperback)
by Mark H. Gaffney (Author), Dr. David Ray Griffin (Foreword)

Unlike other accounts of the historic attacks on 9/11, this discussion surveys the role of the world’s most advanced military command and control plane, the E-4B, in the day’s events and proposes that the horrific incidents were the work of a covert operation staged within elements of the U.S. military and the intelligence community. Presenting hard evidence in the form of proprietary photos taken from raw footage filmed by CNN, the account places the world’s most advanced electronics platform circling over the White House at approximately the time of the Pentagon attack.

http://www.amazon.com/11-Mystery-Pl...=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1217700259&sr=1-2

Wayne Madsen has excerpts:

http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/articles/20080731
 
Presenting hard evidence in the form of proprietary photos taken from raw footage filmed by CNN
maybe my standards are too high, but how do screencaps constitute hard evidence?
 
The 9/11 Mystery Plane

9/11 Mystery Plane said:
Quote:
Unlike other accounts of the historic attacks on 9/11, this discussion surveys the role of the world’s most advanced military command and control plane, the E-4B, in the day’s events and proposes that the horrific incidents were the work of a covert operation staged within elements of the U.S. military and the intelligence community. Presenting hard evidence in the form of proprietary photos taken from raw footage filmed by CNN, the account places the world’s most advanced electronics platform circling over the White House at approximately the time of the Pentagon attack.
If the plane was a mystery as the title says, why do they know it's an E-4B? Must not have been a mystery after all. Sort of as idiotic as claiming the freemasons are a secret society that is known.
 
The 9/11 Mystery Plane: And The Vanishing of America (Paperback)
by Mark H. Gaffney (Author), Dr. David Ray Griffin (Foreword)



http://www.amazon.com/11-Mystery-Pl...=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1217700259&sr=1-2

Wayne Madsen has excerpts:

http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/articles/20080731

Its actually a very well done book. The author creates a fictional story about the role of the U.S. government's involvement in the attacks of September 11th. Gaffney's imagination comes alive in this book and makes for a very enticing fantasy. You can pretend like you are a detective uncovering the largest conspiracy in the history of the planet Earth based on the clever clues that Gaffney has pulled from the depths of his own creative mind. Leave your logic at the door, and let this book take you into a world not based on reality, but on the very essence of paranoia itself. A very exciting read!
 
Doesn't an E4B have a big honkin' radar antenna thing on it? They're not exactly inconspicuous. Did anyone report seeing an E4B near the Pentagon that day? And if they did, would it be unusual seeing as DC is the nation's capital after all?


What would be unusual about it is if it were there as the Pentagon was hit, but nothing from Langley or the Presidents airstrip was able to make it(IE FIGHTER JETS)
 
What would be unusual about it is if it were there as the Pentagon was hit, but nothing from Langley or Presidents airstrip was able to make it(IE FIGHTER JETS)
What is unusual? Please be specific.
 
As has been explained here ad nauseam, the fighters' response time was too slow for them to be able to intercept 77. My questions remain unanswered. How was the "mystery plane" identified as an E4B, and would it be unusual to see an E4B in the sky over our nation's capital?
 
Last edited:
As has been explained here ad nauseam, the fighters' response time was too slow for them to be able to intercept 77. My questions remain unanswered. How was the "mystery plane" identified as an E4B, and would it be unusual to see an E4B in the sky over our nation's capital?

White, four engines (modified 747), widely seen, photographed, videotaped, broadcast, often confused with Flight 77 (reports of it flying over the capitol are usually referring to this). Linda Brookhart's famous photo:
E4B_Brookhart.jpg

I don't know how unusual it is, but many people felt it was unusual, flying over restricted airspace. Four of these "Doomsday planes" were part of the Global Guardian exercise happening that morning. This is probably one.

It's not officially acknowledged but in every other way. CNN did a segment on it even. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUUF7a42qz8 The 84 RADES radar data farmer obtained shows it taking off from Andrews AFB at 9:43, flying north over the east side of the capitol at 9:45, west along its north edge, looping north and passing south over its west edge again at 9:49.

So I dunno, is that unusual?

I pre-ordered the book, he's not a CIT-Pffft level liar, but I don't really hold high hopes for it. 9:32? He's in good company there - Terral Lee Croft and Barbara Honegger are the other two champions of a case built on two wall clocks that had fallen and stopped at attack time - and had their hands wind up lower, pointing at 9:30-32. Broken clocks + gravity? Or 9:32 attack? It's no Essene secret that Gaffney chose the latter (if couched as "might it be," etc.)

I have to say, not promising. But I'll see how the book is.
 
How could this plane be the flyover plane if it didn't take off till six minutes after the attack?

"Ambiguous blending," faked radar, etc... In other words, Twoofer BS. I don't think that's Gaffney's case, but Farmer sorta suggested it recently, and he's been consulting on the book.
 
And why would you need to fly the E-4B low over the capitol? Would not its radar and communications system work just as well at altitude?
 
What are "proprietary photos"? Without cruising the dictionary, the phrase sounds like, "someone owns them." How does that make them better?

Language inflation.
 
SDC,

The irony is that the video footage from CNN would be the truly "proprietary" component of that equation. Wonder if they bothered to do something as mundane in publishing as 'clearance'?

And doctoraudit? You seem to forget that in twooferland, like all Bondian supervillains, the Bush administration has this Achilles heel about setting everything up perfectly for a faked plane crash except for one astonishingly stupid oversight. Sort of like the fracas going on over in the AA77 FDR Data, Explained thread. You know, the government set everything up, knocked over light poles while everyone was distracted, blew holes in the Pentagon, placed bodies and plane parts and somehow overlooked something as basic as making the fake FDR data match the observed flight path.

HTH
Fitz
 
Seems to me with the issues of transponders and all .Putting one of those baby's in the air is a very prudent thing to do......no?
 

Back
Top Bottom