SpringHallConvert
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2010
- Messages
- 1,272
Given how uncertain things in real life are and nothing can be known with 100% certainty, the thread title is likely to grab attention. Having said that it is very unlikely to have happened with the government giving support to the perpetuators of 9/11.
Based on what, exactly? What the government claims?
Plus your version of events requires the government to have been conspiring to commit this atrocity since the seventies at least, though it would very likely require a much larger time span than that. You have any idea just how unlikely that sounds to an objective listener?
Planning the 9/11 attacks since the 70s? What on earth are you talking about? My version only requires the government to have been secretly funneling money to Al-Qaeda over a period of years. Nothing more, nothing less. The rest is just your own straw man.
And all the private, independent, international parties who also investigated the incident were just playing along? Why would they do that, SHC?
First of all, it's an unfounded assumption that these parties were "independent". Second of all, none of them would have had the same kind of access to evidence of U.S. government culpability that the U.S. government would have.
Except, as has been pointed out to you repeatedly, that the government/Jews were never primary suspects.
Well, they should have been, based on the answer to the simple question "qui bono?". Both the Israeli and U.S. governments had much to gain from the attacks, and definitely far more than Al-Qaeda gained.