The 100% Impossible 9/11 Inside Job

[SpringHallConvert]

I don't think the government to the whole truth but probably not in the way you think. I believe Al Qaeda terrorists hijacked 4 airliners and crashed them into 1 and 2 World Trade Center , The Pentagon, and a field in PA.

The towers collapsed as a direct result of fires and impact damage.

And? Assuming all this is true, it still wouldn't prove that 9/11 wasn't an inside job. For all you know, Al-Qaeda could be a U.S. government proxy for state-sponsored terrorism. Maybe Osama bin Laden was on the CIA's payroll, too.

You don't know. You only think you do.

 

[SpringHallConvert]

The evidence points to it being right.

How so? Who provided the evidence and how was it presented and through what channels? How can you be certain the "evidence" wasn't fabricated just like the evidence of fabled, non-existent WMDs in Iraq?

 

[TJM]

How can you be certain the "evidence" wasn't fabricated just like the evidence of fabled, non-existent WMDs in Iraq?

The answer to that is self evident.

 

[LSSBB]

And? Assuming all this is true, it still wouldn't prove that 9/11 wasn't an inside job. For all you know, Al-Qaeda could be a U.S. government proxy for state-sponsored terrorism. Maybe Osama bin Laden was on the CIA's payroll, too.

You don't know. You only think you do.

Ok, I'll bite, Neo.

For all you know, it could have been space aliens and Sauron. Conjecture. Make up whatever you want.

If you have no proof the evidence was faked, you have no proof the evidence was faked.

ETA: Meaningless conjecture on your part aside, what about that OP?

 

[SpringHallConvert]

So what was wrong in the OP?

What, you mean other than it being nonsense?

It doesn't prove anything. I was waiting to find out why 9/11 couldn't have been an inside job. Instead, all it was was rambling.

 

[beachnut]

It's entertaining to watch all these government truthers try to defend the official conspiracy theory. Believing what the corporate-owned government and media tells them about 9-11 is like a religious experience for these folks.

Wake me up when someone proves that 9-11 couldn't have been an inside job.

You missed it, proved on 911. Sorry, you lost this one, but you got zip. No wonder you missed it, you are asleep.

It is ironic, you have no evidence to support your nothingness. You ignore evidence, so you can spew woo.


We be waiting for you to prove it was an inside job, and you have failed given 10 years. No need to prove you are wrong, you offered zero theory, zero facts, zero evidence, zero story, zero logic, zero knowledge, zero claims, a big pile of zero. Math.

 

[LSSBB]

What, you mean other than it being nonsense?

It doesn't prove anything. I was waiting to find out why 9/11 couldn't have been an inside job. Instead, all it was was rambling.

No, the OP makes a very valid point. Do you know anything about probability? Do you know that the more complex you make a system, the more opportunities for error you introduce? How about logistics. Do you know what it takes to carry off a major, complex operation?

 

[SpringHallConvert]

If you have no proof the evidence was faked, you have no proof the evidence was faked.

ETA: Meaningless conjecture on your part aside, what about that OP?

Likewise, if you have no proof the evidence is legitimate, you have no proof the evidence is legitimate.

ETA: Meaningless conjecture on your part aside, what about the OP makes it correct?

 

[dc1971]

Most of the os supporters on here, do nothing but belittle anyone who questions anything.
Insults are irrelevant to the topic! You just show your hate, which proves nothing!

Show ONE example of belittling?

Show ONE example of an insult?

Show ONE example of hate?

 

[beachnut]

Likewise, if you have no proof the evidence is legitimate, you have no proof the evidence is legitimate.

ETA: Meaningless conjecture on your part aside, what about the OP makes it correct?

You better open your proof it was an inside job thread. Wait, you can't, you have no evidence. Too bad, it would be a Pulitzer Prize experience. But you are over 10 years late.

 

[dc1971]

Likewise, if you have no proof the evidence is legitimate, you have no proof the evidence is legitimate.

ETA: Meaningless conjecture on your part aside, what about the OP makes it correct?

And so...

Likewise! If you have no proof the evidence was faked, you have no proof the evidence was faked.

No need to edit: Unsubstantial conjecture on your part aside, what makes the OP meaningless?

 

[TJM]

What, you mean other than it being nonsense?

It doesn't prove anything. I was waiting to find out why 9/11 couldn't have been an inside job. Instead, all it was was rambling.

Ah.

So you wish to dismiss it without refuting any of the points the OP makes or in short, a handwave.

 

[SpringHallConvert]

You missed it, proved on 911. Sorry, you lost this one, but you got zip. No wonder you missed it, you are asleep.

It is ironic, you have no evidence to support your nothingness. You ignore evidence, so you can spew woo.


We be waiting for you to prove it was an inside job, and you have failed given 10 years. No need to prove you are wrong, you offered zero theory, zero facts, zero evidence, zero story, zero logic, zero knowledge, zero claims, a big pile of zero. Math.

Where's your proof that it wasn't an inside job? Show me the evidence that proves that Al-Qaeda was working independently of a state sponsor that day.


You got nothing.

 

[LSSBB]

Where's your proof that it wasn't an inside job? Show me the evidence that proves that Al-Qaeda was working independently of a state sponsor that day.


You got nothing.

If YOU are accusing the government of complicity, then YOU have to supply the proof to convict them.

 

[SpringHallConvert]

Uh oh.

Looks like I stirred up a nest of government truthers here!

"The government didn't do it! The government wasn't involved! I know this because they said so! All the evidence the government provided me implicates somebody else! If you question my government truth I'll call you a truther! Ha, ha, I'm so clever! "

That about sums it up.

 

[dc1971]

uh oh.

Looks like i stirred up a nest of government truthers here!

"the government didn't do it! The government wasn't involved! I know this because they said so! All the evidence the government provided me implicates somebody else! If you question my government truth i'll call you a truther! Ha, ha, i'm so clever! "

that about sums it up.

Yawn!

 

[beachnut]

Where's your proof that it wasn't an inside job? Show me the evidence that proves that Al-Qaeda was working independently of a state sponsor that day.


You got nothing.

I got 11 computers, an i7 four core crunching 4 shows from 7 gigs to 1.7 gig divx files this very second. I am the pilot who had everything. You are a 911 truth super person with nothing, you have no claims, you make no point. ... you got zero evidence to support your non-theory, your off-topic nothingness. You were wrong, I got everything.

You are making up false implications of woo. You forgot your evidence. You are not making a claim, you are trolling, unarmed, zero evidence, zero claims, nothing more than talk.

What do you think the topic is?

 

[TJM]

Uh oh.

Looks like I stirred up a nest of government truthers here!

"The government didn't do it! The government wasn't involved! I know this because they said so! All the evidence the government provided me implicates somebody else! If you question my government truth I'll call you a truther! Ha, ha, I'm so clever! "

That about sums it up.

Actually we're waiting for you to make a case. So far, I see nothing but rhetoric.

 

[332nd]

How so?

Evidence points to the truth... that's what it does.

Who provided the evidence and how was it presented and through what channels?

Who provided it. http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/someoftheagencies,organizationsandindivi

On internet sites, TV, radio, newspapers, magazines, scientific journals, etc...

How can you be certain the "evidence" wasn't fabricated just like the evidence of fabled, non-existent WMDs in Iraq?

You do realize that here you are pointing out that the same government that would have had to fool and/or intimidate thousands of firefighters, engineers, architects, law enforcement officers, pilots, crash scene investigators, etc.. both here & abroad...

Either forgot to or could figure out how to plant a few WMDs in areas they had full control over.

 

[beachnut]

...
That about sums it up.

... some failed math. That proves it.

Subsets include but not limited to: air strike on WTC 1, secret demolition of WTC 1, air strike on WTC 2, secret demolition of WTC 2, secret demolition of WTC 7, air strike on the Pentagon, secret explosion at the Pentagon, crash in Pennsylvania (presumably designed into the plan, as any preparation for a false hit by the 4th airliner (generally considered after-the-fact to be either the White House or the capital building) would be untenably risky)

Please expose your vast NWO CT! Please?! Which inside job is your favorite? ... all you offer is nonsense, a weak trolling sprew.

I say all the inside job claims are false, idiotic claims, failed lies, based on hearsay, and delusions. Why can't you state your claims, and support your inside job delusions.