The 100% Impossible 9/11 Inside Job

''Have you researched what John Farmer believed really happened? If not, I don't see why you drop his name in the same post where you brag of your research efforts. If you know what Farmer thinks, then the rest of your post makes no sense"


John Farmer "It was the product of a government that doesn't work, and the FALSE STORY put forward about the events of that morning.....
Read between the lines. I don't think he wanted to commit political suicide....or any other suicide.
 
It's entertaining to watch all these government truthers try to defend the official conspiracy theory. Believing what the corporate-owned government and media tells them about 9-11 is like a religious experience for these folks.

Wake me up when someone proves that 9-11 couldn't have been an inside job.
 
It's entertaining to watch all these government truthers try to defend the official conspiracy theory. Believing what the corporate-owned government and media tells them about 9-11 is like a religious experience for these folks.

Wake me up when someone proves that 9-11 couldn't have been an inside job.

"government truthers?"

I think that might be the best thing I've ever read here.
 
"government truthers?"

I think that might be the best thing I've ever read here.

Sure, why not? It seems rather fitting to me.

If one qualifies as a "truther" for merely questioning the official story/conspiracy theory, then one must also qualify as a "truther" the moment they defend the official story/conspiracy theory, since neither side has factually proven their case. The government's version of 9/11 events is just as much a theory about a conspiracy as any other.
 
It's entertaining to watch all these government truthers try to defend the official conspiracy theory. Believing what the corporate-owned government and media tells them about 9-11 is like a religious experience for these folks.

Wake me up when someone proves that 9-11 couldn't have been an inside job.
Proven beyond doubt in the OP.

You're welcome.
 
Sure, why not? It seems rather fitting to me.

If one qualifies as a "truther" for merely questioning the official story/conspiracy theory, then one must also qualify as a "truther" the moment they defend the official story/conspiracy theory, since neither side has factually proven their case. The government's version of 9/11 events is just as much a theory about a conspiracy as any other.

Well... no.

9/11 conspiracy theorists themselves coined the term "Truther", which has bit them on the ass ever since.

Sorry bub, nice try though.

ETA:

Proven beyond doubt in the OP.

You're welcome.

Thanks for that.

So SpringHallConvert, What's your take on the OP?
 
Last edited:
Sure, why not? It seems rather fitting to me.

If one qualifies as a "truther" for merely questioning the official story/conspiracy theory, then one must also qualify as a "truther" the moment they defend the official story/conspiracy theory, since neither side has factually proven their case. The government's version of 9/11 events is just as much a theory about a conspiracy as any other.


When you question the official story, do you actually listen to the answers, or do you listen for a way to ignore the answer?
 
Well... no.

9/11 conspiracy theorists themselves coined the term "Truther", which has bit them on the ass ever since.

So then I take it you are a government truther, right? You believe the government told you the truth about 9/11 and now believe their version of events over any other?
 
So then I take it you are a government truther, right? You believe the government told you the truth about 9/11 and now believe their version of events over any other?

I don't think the government to the whole truth but probably not in the way you think. I believe Al Qaeda terrorists hijacked 4 airliners and crashed them into 1 and 2 World Trade Center , The Pentagon, and a field in PA.

The towers collapsed as a direct result of fires and impact damage.

The IS what the evidence shows. No matter how you look at it. Bombs and laser beams are nothing but bunk.
 
So then I take it you are a government truther, right? You believe the government told you the truth about 9/11 and now believe their version of events over any other?

No.

You took it wrong. Not surprising for a truther though.

So what was wrong in the OP? Care to elaborate or would you rather mince words with me over the idiotic descriptor your ilk coined for themselves? I can do this all night.
 

Back
Top Bottom