The 100% Impossible 9/11 Inside Job

Yup. 100% of what silver birch knows about 9-11 comes from conspiracy websites. All he knows is about some vague thing called the "official story" that these websites tell him is all lies.

He has absolutely NO idea what the commonly-held narrative is or what evidence exists to support it.
 
What about the phone calls and radio calls from the passengers reporting that the plane was hijacked?

I posted a comment about a phonecall from flight 93 several pages back, and a link.
if you research the phonecalls there are many anomalies which make them less convincing.
 
why do you ask such a stupid question?
I was making the claim that not recieving the hijack code was proof the planes were not hijacked. therefore there must be an alternative explanation for the events of 9/11.
Because my asking would show why the pilots would not bother to do what you think was important.

So, why would the pilots not worry about being killed and enter this code?

Bet you continue to show your clueless with your reply.
 
Last edited:
Yup. 100% of what silver birch knows about 9-11 comes from conspiracy websites. All he knows is about some vague thing called the "official story" that these websites tell him is all lies.

I've already said I don't believe everything on the internet about 9/11.
much of what I have learned is from a book entitled- The new pearl harbour revisited by David Ray Griffin.
the official story, without quotes is exactly that. it is the 9/11 commission. mainly from NIST. it is what your and my government want us to believe. there is nothing vague about.
so, this is what conspiracy theory is about.
are we being told the truth by your government and mine?
 
silver birch:

There's a reason "occupy"* is more significant than "truthers". You're it.

* That's not saying much.
 
Last edited:
why do you ask such a stupid question?
I was making the claim that not recieving the hijack code was proof the planes were not hijacked. therefore there must be an alternative explanation for the events of 9/11.

Since you seem ignorant of the following:


  • The doors were unlocked
  • The pilots were strapped into chairs
  • The code would have to be entered manually
  • The code was intended as a way for pilots to alert ATC surreptitiously
  • Pilots were trained to obey hijacker demands

Yup. 100% of what silver birch knows about 9-11 comes from conspiracy websites. All he knows is about some vague thing called the "official story" that these websites tell him is all lies.

I've already said I don't believe everything on the internet about 9/11.
much of what I have learned is from a book entitled- The new pearl harbour revisited by David Ray Griffin.
the official story, without quotes is exactly that. it is the 9/11 commission. mainly from NIST. it is what your and my government want us to believe. there is nothing vague about.
so, this is what conspiracy theory is about.
are we being told the truth by your government and mine?

The 9/11 Commission was only one investigation among many. The FBI investigation dwarfed the 9/11 Commission by many orders of magnitude. Aside from the mentioned NIST investigation other investigations were conducted by the FAA, insurance companies, airlines, engineering groups and numerous universities the world over into various aspects of the events of that day.
 
Silver Birch:

Your join date is stated as Sept 2006, yet you are posting like this was yesterday. Did you just recover from a coma or a severe head injury?
 
That would be the FBI that didn't find enough evidence to incriminate OBL?

MM

You mean the all-powerful organization that helped pull of the hoax of the century but couldn't trump up some charges against OBL to keep google warriors like you from getting suspicous?
 
...
first of all- 'we tell them we are being attacked' so you are an airline pilot then. ...
I have an ATP. I flew in the USAF, we have special rules, look them up.

I have set the transponder to emergency to get ATC attention, to warn them we are turning back to home, engine fire... They were busy talking, I was going to exercise my emergency authority and used the code to get their attention. Using the radio when they are talking, or other crews are talking only messes up all the communication, you have no clue...

I flew the equal to a airline pilot for the USAF in my late 20s. First flew in 73 got my first FAA ticket, flew high performance super-sonic jet trainer in 75, flew heavy jets in 76, flew as the guy in charge even carried passengers in 78.

No need to set hijack code, you tell them. If you can't talk you set the code, if you want attention NOW, you set the code; need some help? Strangle your parrot buddy.

...
perhaps you could tell me about your experiences of being hijacked, I would love to hear them. ...
You would have to be an idiot to hijack a USAF aircraft.
We are trained to tell ATC, if no radio, we set the code. You are a slow learner, and you posted the procedure. Are you having problems with comprehension?



...
the squawk transmits over the transponder, which is telemetry which is not the same frequency as voice. ...
lol, you are funny.
Next time at least give the wiki version. wowzer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transponder_(aviation)
You don't waste time doing research.


...
so in a matter of life and death, when every second counts, its still too bad mannered to squawk without asking first, I see....
In a life and death situation where someone runs up and cuts your throat, you might set the code, but I doubt you have time. Go ahead explain how you set the hijack code for being murdered when you are dead. Make my day.

Oh, be sure to say people can't run up and cut throats with small blades when the pilots are facing the front, and the murderer comes up from behind.

What is the code for murder smart guy? Got any clues?

Pilots wear should harnesses and seat belts... try to think about things before you expose your lack of knowlege.

...
the new pearl harbour revisited, page 177-
the 9/11 commission did acknowledge that sending the code would have been standard procedure, writing, ...
Using DRG is the sure sign you have lost this argument, he is nuts.
Wow, and then you post the fact the pilots use the radio.

BTW, you used the 911 commission, which means you know the planes were "hijacked", by terrorists. You messed up and used a source which you disagree with. Bad form. You cherry-picked your way to ignorance.

...
FAA guidance to controllers on hijack procedures assumed that the aircraft pilot would notify the controller via radio OR by sqawking a transponder code of 7500- the universal code for a hijack in progress.
You debunk yourself when you should be watching basket ball and NFL playoffs, beer, cutting trees, etc; you spew woo, which debunks you.

FAA guidance, pilot calls ATC on radio. , you debunked yourself.
 
I am outta here and silver goes on my ignore list both for failing to defend his own story and for being too dumb to use QUOTE tags correctly.
 
Yup. 100% of what silver birch knows about 9-11 comes from conspiracy websites. All he knows is about some vague thing called the "official story" that these websites tell him is all lies.

I've already said I don't believe everything on the internet about 9/11.
much of what I have learned is from a book entitled- The new pearl harbour revisited by David Ray Griffin.
the official story, without quotes is exactly that. it is the 9/11 commission. mainly from NIST. it is what your and my government want us to believe. there is nothing vague about.
so, this is what conspiracy theory is about.
are we being told the truth by your government and mine?

Many of us on this forum have the engineering training and practical experience to determine what happened quite independently of any government report so you can drop the strawman that we all just follow the government line.

.
 

Back
Top Bottom