The 100% Impossible 9/11 Inside Job

BTW tempesta you owe me an irony meter; you smashed mine to smithereens
 
I find it hard to believe that Temp & other Truthers can state that 9/11 was a "covert op".

Given that statement, it's also hard to believe that Controlled Demolition Experts, Purdue University, FEMA, MIT, EMRTC, NIST, NORAD, NEADS, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Civil Engineers, FAA, American Airlines, United Airlines, Eyewitnesses, 9/11 Victims and their Families, Air Force, State Government, State Senate, National Government, Congress, New York City, Fire Investigators, Fire Sciences, Fire Dispatchers, FDNY, NYPD, Police Dispatchers, New York Port Authority Police, Pentagon, Emergency Service Unit, Bode Technology, New York Medical Examiners Office, Military and Local sources from Government and Civilian sectors would all be "paid off" to remain silent.

1,000s' of people can't keep a secret! Hell, everyone knew Area 51 existed even before the Government said that it did because of a few people that worked there. I don't know if the UFO thing is real, probably isn't, but they are making some very interesting aircraft there.

Any Truther that thinks 9/11 is a "covert op", is making a very idioitic statement.
 
Last edited:
I agree. In true conspiracy theorist form, however, truthers dismiss Wikileaks as everything from a CIA front to a Zionist plot for not exposing the obvious (to them) fact that 9-11 was an inside job. Of course, had Wikileaks found material that implicated someone other than Al Queda for 9-11, they would be hailed as heroes.

Nature of the beast.

Ironic that the all knowing, deceptive, black op, secretive US gubmint has had to ask Twitter for the release of information of the wikileeks. Is this the same all powerfull gubmint that can keep under wraps the mass murder of3,000 of its own citizens but cant infiltrate an internet agency or prevent a student from disclosing that she performed a sexual act on its president?

Long live the woo.
 
Hell, everyone knew Area 51 existed even before the Government said that it did because of a few people that worked there. I don't know if the UFO thing is real, probably isn't, but they are making some very interesting aircraft there.

Military aircraft are boring to the general public but not to other military. Space ships and space men satisfy both..........doh.
 
So you have residue from the explosives then?

nanothermite claims in 5....4.....3....2....

Or we will get the

They didn't test the steel so we will never know handwave in 5.....4.....3....2....
 
nanothermite claims in 5....4.....3....2....

Or we will get the

They didn't test the steel so we will never know handwave in 5.....4.....3....2....

One of those two. Or perhaps he has turned and fled,just like Javaman.
 
What do you mean "already fractured"? The columns are severed level by level starting at the base.



Well how else does this building achieve free fall unless all the columns are somehow already fractured but still somehow supporting their loads? I can't explain the official story; that's your job.



If you have some evidence that WTC 7's collapse rates are out of the ordinary for CDs and ordinary for a fire-induced collapse then I'm all ears.



I, like you, once believed in what I was told about 9/11, but then I got tired of explaining all of the coincidences, firsts, and anomalies. Sometimes the obvious answer isn't always the obvious answer.

You must have been hanging around with the wrong crowd.
 
Originally Posted by dafydd
You have not presented any facts yet.

I love this peanut gallery, you perhaps most of all. Do you care to be called out on your above claim, or would you just prefer to retreat to your prior employment of spectator?

You keep using that word "fact". Over the course of 477 posts, you have proven that you do not know what it means.

Well how else does this building achieve free fall unless all the columns are somehow already fractured but still somehow supporting their loads? I can't explain the official story; that's your job.



If you have some evidence that WTC 7's collapse rates are out of the ordinary for CDs and ordinary for a fire-induced collapse then I'm all ears.



I, like you, once believed in what I was told about 9/11, but then I got tired of explaining all of the coincidences, firsts, and anomalies. Sometimes the obvious answer isn't always the obvious answer.
 
nanothermite claims in 5....4.....3....2....

Or we will get the

They didn't test the steel so we will never know handwave in 5.....4.....3....2....

Ah yes, such is the intellectual integrity of the 9/11 denial movement. I prefer the word denial to truth. It's become grotesquely clear to me that truth is not on the agenda for these people.
 
Perhaps Tempesta and Javaman should team up and pool their facts. After all,two heads are better than........what am I saying!?
Wasn't RedIbis going to start a 9/11 Facts movement? Maybe they could all team up!
 
Maybe you should collate all your "facts" in a single post, and then write a theory that explains these "facts" as well as all those actual facts you've ignored or hand-waved away?

And then what, you'll show that theory and its accompanying facts the amount of respect you've in the past?

Doesn't sound worth it.

Of course, we all know you can't do this. No truther has done this yet, and I doubt you'll be the first.

You ever get tired of being a stereotype?
 
You don't have facts, temp. You also don't have a coherent timeline of 9/11.
 

Back
Top Bottom