Craig4
Penultimate Amazing
I think it was a covert op. The three WTC buildings were rigged with explosives.
So you have residue from the explosives then?
I think it was a covert op. The three WTC buildings were rigged with explosives.
I agree. In true conspiracy theorist form, however, truthers dismiss Wikileaks as everything from a CIA front to a Zionist plot for not exposing the obvious (to them) fact that 9-11 was an inside job. Of course, had Wikileaks found material that implicated someone other than Al Queda for 9-11, they would be hailed as heroes.
Nature of the beast.
Hell, everyone knew Area 51 existed even before the Government said that it did because of a few people that worked there. I don't know if the UFO thing is real, probably isn't, but they are making some very interesting aircraft there.
Military aircraft are boring to the general public but not to other military. Space ships and space men satisfy both..........doh.
So you have residue from the explosives then?
Gullible Puppets would be the best name for a rock band EVER!
nanothermite claims in 5....4.....3....2....
Or we will get the
They didn't test the steel so we will never know handwave in 5.....4.....3....2....
What do you mean "already fractured"? The columns are severed level by level starting at the base.
Well how else does this building achieve free fall unless all the columns are somehow already fractured but still somehow supporting their loads? I can't explain the official story; that's your job.
If you have some evidence that WTC 7's collapse rates are out of the ordinary for CDs and ordinary for a fire-induced collapse then I'm all ears.
I, like you, once believed in what I was told about 9/11, but then I got tired of explaining all of the coincidences, firsts, and anomalies. Sometimes the obvious answer isn't always the obvious answer.
You must have been hanging around with the wrong crowd.
I think it was a covert op. The three WTC buildings were rigged with explosives.
I was asked for a theory. I gave one.
Edited by jhunter1163:Edited for civility.
I love this peanut gallery, you perhaps most of all. Do you care to be called out on your above claim, or would you just prefer to retreat to your prior employment of spectator?
Well how else does this building achieve free fall unless all the columns are somehow already fractured but still somehow supporting their loads? I can't explain the official story; that's your job.
If you have some evidence that WTC 7's collapse rates are out of the ordinary for CDs and ordinary for a fire-induced collapse then I'm all ears.
I, like you, once believed in what I was told about 9/11, but then I got tired of explaining all of the coincidences, firsts, and anomalies. Sometimes the obvious answer isn't always the obvious answer.
I think it was a covert op. The three WTC buildings were rigged with explosives.
nanothermite claims in 5....4.....3....2....
Or we will get the
They didn't test the steel so we will never know handwave in 5.....4.....3....2....
Wasn't RedIbis going to start a 9/11 Facts movement? Maybe they could all team up!Perhaps Tempesta and Javaman should team up and pool their facts. After all,two heads are better than........what am I saying!?
Maybe you should collate all your "facts" in a single post, and then write a theory that explains these "facts" as well as all those actual facts you've ignored or hand-waved away?
Of course, we all know you can't do this. No truther has done this yet, and I doubt you'll be the first.
You ever get tired of being a stereotype?