• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Terrorist Attack in Spain - Over 60 dead

Darat

Lackey
Staff member
Joined
Aug 3, 2001
Messages
125,772
Location
South East, UK
See http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3500452.stm

Scores die in Madrid bomb carnage


A string of deadly blasts has hit three Madrid train stations during the rush hour with latest reports speaking of more than 100 people killed.

Dazed and bloodied commuters staggered from the Atocha station in the heart of the Spanish capital where two blasts destroyed a suburban train.

Two other train stations were also hit by the near simultaneous explosions.

...snip...

They threatened they'd start bombing again, I suppose all we can hope for is that this won’t be a prelude back to the 70s scale of terrorist murders.
 
Sh!te!

Thats terrible, I love Madrid.

Nobody seems to like those Castillians very much though, do they?
 
Jon_in_london said:
It seems Darat is the winner, but only by a single minute!
Quicker isn't always better. Bask in the high quality of my thread and mock at the shoddyness of Darat's effort. :D
 
I suppose it's ETA but do we know for sure it's not bin Laden's mob?

Either way my thoughts are with the families of the dead and injured.

These people are dead because someone, somewhere had a belief he couldn't tolerate other people not having.

The perpetrators deserve pity, if you can manage it. Scorn, if you can't.
I can't manage pity.
 
I must admit I've been conditioned to think of any bomb as being Al Qaeda in origin, and it was my first thought this morning. However, my second thought was that Eta is the most likely to be setting bombs off in Madrid.

I note that this is the second batch of bombs to go off in trains recently - there was one on the Moscow subway a few weeks back.

Personally, I've always thought that a bomb on an Underground train would be as good a terror weapon as you could hope to have, and frankly I'm surprised that it's not happened. It would be particularly straightforward in these days of suicide bombers. A single person with a rucksack full of Semtex on a few of the major underground lines - Circle, Bakerloo, Northern Line for example - would cripple London for days or even weeks.

It's not a particularly cheerful line of thought.
 
Oleron said:
I suppose it's ETA but do we know for sure it's not bin Laden's mob?

Either way my thoughts are with the families of the dead and injured.
I was at the Atocha station in Madrid just a few weeks ago; a colleague's girlfriend is heading there in the next few days. Scary stuff, and tragic for the dead, the injured and their families.

Eta does seem most likely. A plot to blow up a station in Madrid was apparently foiled in December when police arrested suspected Eta members driving to Madrid with 500Kg of explosives in their truck. With Spain having a general election this week, the aim is presumably to disrupt the democratic process and force Eta's agenda into the election.

Nothing proven yet though, as far as I know.
 
Oleron said:

These people are dead because someone, somewhere had a belief he couldn't tolerate other people not having.

Actually, someone, somewhere wants a seperate state for whatever reasons... Nonetheless, the deliberate and indiscriminate murder of 60 people just trying to earn a living while harming no-one is thoroughly dispicable when there are peacefull avenues available.


I give this thread 2 hours before it turn into an Isreal/Palestine slanging match.
 
The death toll has gone up to over 130 - that's more than doubled in the last couple of hours. A pretty major atrocity :(
 
richardm said:
Personally, I've always thought that a bomb on an Underground train would be as good a terror weapon as you could hope to have, and frankly I'm surprised that it's not happened. It would be particularly straightforward in these days of suicide bombers. A single person with a rucksack full of Semtex on a few of the major underground lines - Circle, Bakerloo, Northern Line for example - would cripple London for days or even weeks.

Weeks!? since it takes them 6 months just to service an escalator, I doubt they would be able to restore full service before the thermal heat death of the universe.

Scary thing is, you dont even have to be a suicide bomber, just fill a coke can with nails and semtex, leave can on train. boom.
 
Jon_in_london said:


Weeks!? since it takes them 6 months just to service an escalator, I doubt they would be able to restore full service before the thermal heat death of the universe.


True :D

Scary thing is, you dont even have to be a suicide bomber, just fill a coke can with nails and semtex, leave can on train. boom.

That would kill lots of people and make a mess, but I was thinking about a really big bang that would leave a huge mass of wreckage and perhaps compromise the integrity of the tunnel. Doing the job properly, if you like. For that you'd need a substantial amount of explosive, and Londoners get a bit twitchy if people leave large bags lying around on trains. Whether they'd be twitchy enough to act on it in time if you hopped off the train at a station and left it timed to go off as the train pulled out, I don't know.

Anyway - shouldn't derail the thread, really.

Edited to add: Above pun was unintentional. And also, I've just seen the pictures of the Madrid trains; That does look quite comprehensive. I don't think Eta use suicide bombers either, so you can probably ignore all that waffling above.
 
Jon_in_london said:

Scary thing is, you dont even have to be a suicide bomber, just fill a coke can with nails and semtex, leave can on train. boom.

And if you're no into killing people, small devices with timers chucked onto the rails to damage them could work nearly as effectively.

Not that any of us are planning such an attack Mr MI5
 
richardm said:
…snip…

Personally, I've always thought that a bomb on an Underground train would be as good a terror weapon as you could hope to have, and frankly I'm surprised that it's not happened. It would be particularly straightforward in these days of suicide bombers. A single person with a rucksack full of Semtex on a few of the major underground lines - Circle, Bakerloo, Northern Line for example - would cripple London for days or even weeks.

…snip…

I've often wondered about the targets chosen by terrorists in the UK in the past. I've made an assumption that we really did have good intelligence and it forced them to be less "strategic". For instance two vans with explosives under a couple of the major flyovers into London, or on the M25 could cripple the whole of Greater London area, probably for months.

(I was also angered but not surprised when I heard Straw offering sympathy and understanding because (paraphrasing) "we've had bomb attacks in London". How dare the man, what about all the other places in the UK that have suffered terrible bomb attacks!)



But to the important news, if this is ETA then I think it may actually be the end of the organisation. When it is “just” a handful of people at a time being killed every few months we seem to learn to live with it. This is such a terrible tragedy and the scale seems enormous that it may shock people out of their apathy. I suspect that many of those that previously may have said “yes, but they do have a point..” will no longer find those words comfortable.

(Why do we keep killing each other for such stupid and inane reasons? :( )
 
The Don said:


And if you're no into killing people, small devices with timers chucked onto the rails to damage them could work nearly as effectively.

Not that any of us are planning such an attack Mr MI5

Or just phone in a warning 15 minutes before.... You get lots of carnage but no blood spilled.
 
Jon_in_london said:
Nonetheless, the deliberate and indiscriminate murder of 60 people just trying to earn a living while harming no-one is thoroughly dispicable when there are peacefull avenues available.

What peaceful avenues would these be? You can't be talking about political ones since the main party has been banned.
 
geni said:


What peaceful avenues would these be? You can't be talking about political ones since the main party has been banned.

There are other separatist parties who do not affiliate themselves with ETA, though, llike the Basque National Party. Batasuna only got about 10% of the vote last time around, so they're not exactly the main one, just the most famous on account of them being a bunch of terrorist scum ^H^H^H^H supporters.
 
AOL's news gave me the impression this was just a run-of-the-mill train accident.

It's so easy, no wonder it's number one!!
 
The ETA is justified in blowing up three Madrid train stations. Why?

1) The Spanish "settlements" on Bask land.

2) The Spanish "occupation" of Bask lands.

3) The Spanish government's "arrests and assasinations" of Bask leaders.

4) The French "deportations" of all the ETA members in 1986.



Or is blowing up civilians only acceptable when Israelis are the targets?;)
 
Terrible news.

I have to agree that this could be the final major outing for ETA (on the assumption it is them).

They carry out these atrocities imagining that they have some kind of popular support for their agenda. In most cases this simply isn't true. This seems to be the case here. Either the majority are happy to be part of Spain proper, or have drifted away accepting the cause is lost, or they are unable to morally equate these acts with any long term benefit.

On the basis that the bigger the death toll, the higher the reward, I should imagine it won't take long for the people who carried this out to be handed over.
 

Back
Top Bottom