Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the last monthly finals for 2007! This is is, folks - the last hoorah for a month gone by! This month, there are thirteen possible contenders, so without further delay...
#1 - I assume that Texas has grown since I last bought a world map, then...
It is commonly accepted that the entire world population could all fit into the state of Texas and each have an acre of their own land.
#2 - Noam Chomsky, slayer of humanity!
By blinding people to the need to take the only effective action, [Noam Chomsky] is bringing on disaster. If he convinces even one person to do something other than work for 9/11 truth, he may as well have personally murdered all 6 billion people on earth.
#3 - Proof by Microsoft Simulation?
I tried to slam into the Wold Trade Center Towers with my Microsoft Flight Simulator and it was very hard to maneuver the plane to hit the Towers. And I was going slow, not the speeds that the these planes were going. When I tried to go that fast the plane died on me and crashed into the ground. This is proof that 9/11 was an inside job
#4 - Take
this, metallurgy!
Steel at higher temperatures may bend, but it NEVER melts or turns to dust. Never. No, not ever.
#5 - And now, our regularly scheduled space-nut rant...
The Russians were actually the first nation to start a Space Program Conspiracy. Russia's Cold War motivation was to create the illusion of the militaristic domination of space. The US Government simply caught on and created their own conspiracy to compete.
In reality space travel is technologically impossible. Man has never been to space.
The motivation of the Conspiracy is a militaristic one. This is why all astronauts are members of the military. Once you create an illusion of the ability to reach space no other nation will touch you. There is no real research going on at NASA. It's a highly funded propaganda studio designed to create the illusion of America's grasp on space travel. A Saturn Rocket is 95% identical to an ICBM, after all.
#6 - A double-nom for twice the fun!
Nominee #1 said:
They want our guns.
These "mind-controlled zombies" will keep cropping up more and more ...
MK-ULTRA in action - this is their tactic. The sheeple will never get it.
Nominee #2 said:
There was a time I'd call this allegation "crazy".
#7 - The conspiracy relies on...what?
That's only true where the success of the conspiracy depends upon secrecy. What if the conspiracy were so audacious, and diabolical that it would be vehemently disbelieved by default, by a public with an emotional investment in disbelieving it at almost any cost? In this case its success is not a function of secrecy, but of believability when the "secret" is inevitably revealed.
#8 - The Omaha shootings caused a few conspiracists to once again connect-the-dots...
It has been reported that Hawkins shot a Teddybear.....
CNN reported that witnesses and victims can get counseling at Ted E Bear Hollow.....
Teddybear Hollow? Hollow Teddybear? or a Teddybear with the stuffing shot out? This is bizarre to say the least
#9 - Stargate: The Documentary
I believe we were once slaves to aliens but we have been freed and they put us on this planet to carry on.
#10 - Schrödinger's terrorists, maybe?
Perhaps, the world isn't black and white? Perhaps, it's not just either the hijackers existed, or they did not?
#11 - Sometimes it's nice to remember that it's not just the English speaking world that is crazy...
Original said:
maar er zijn wat zeg maar, wetenschappelijke problemen, met het noorderlicht.
En waarom? simpel. In werkelijkheid wordt het noorderlicht veroorzaakt door de "innerlijke zon" in het midden van de ja ja, verder holle aarde.
Translation said:
but there are, let's say, scientific problems with the aurora borealis.
And why? Simple. In reality the aurora borealis is caused by the "inner sun" in the midst of the (yes, yes) hollow earth.
#12 - Note to truther: They have, and you are.
How does one change their mind without losing face after staunchly supporting a single point of view for years?
It's quite alright, you are expected to maintain your opinion even if those responsible for 9/11 confess to their crimes.
#13 - Malaysia, New York, what's the difference?
Truther said:
I didn't say that the same thing should happen to a concrete wall as to a steel wall. In fact, I'd agree that there would be very different results. However, the Twin Towers were constructed largely of reinforced concrete. Like most buildings, steel was used to support the structure.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petronas_Twin_Towers Under "History" it says what the buildings were made of, if you want to read it for yourself.
Representative of the sane said:
The Petronas Twin Towers in Malaysia are built from reinforced concrete. That is the subject of your wikipedia link.
The WTC Towers in New York City were built from steel.
Truther said:
What part of "constructed largely of reinforced concrete" don't you understand? Obviously the twin towers were NOT "completely built as a steel building" if the primary material was concrete. Furthermore, the transportation of any material through the city would be a problem--100's of steel trucks vs. 100's of concrete trucks is still 100s of trucks.
Overall, my point is that 3 planes crashed into reinforced concrete builidngs on 9/11. What differences caused Flight 77 to disintegrate?
That's it, that's all we're done! Place your votes and we'll see this one through to the finish!
Mobyseven
Democratically Elected Tyrant
