• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Ted Olsen not sorry enough

Well it should be a snip for you to produce ECO F0878 and prove them hopelessly wrong.


See the date in the little red box in the bottom of the document? Notice that the tail of the G in page 1 is cut off? That happens when you try to photoshop paste a new date onto a document, Document is fraudulent. We went over this back in 2007 when you were a lil tiny bunny wet behind the ears.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=85833&page=3
 
See the date in the little red box in the bottom of the document? Notice that the tail of the G in page 1 is cut off? That happens when you try to photoshop paste a new date onto a document, Document is fraudulent. We went over this back in 2007 when you were a lil tiny bunny wet behind the ears.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=85833&page=3

Dude he's a holocaust denier, you don't expect him to read a thread do you?

You have to pour the facts it his mouth, and hope that the knowledge does not drool down his chin.

I mean the knucklehead is quoting PFFT, while failing to freaking realize that PFFT received the freaking information three years ago, and said they would "study it." Three years ago.

In the meantime, they continue to sucker in mouthbreathers like this mutt.
 
One thing I learned from Holocaust Denial is when a Hoaxer comes along and says "you will find the answer in this 12 page thread" but are completely unable to provide a concise rebuttal, then I am correct.

Face palm. Here is ECO FO871, issued before ECO FO878.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_go0r2XYwpws/Rut6XRAnZ9I/AAAAAAAAAL8/h3RSUc1GUjw/s1600-h/F0871+001.jpg

You are so obsessed with the Illuminati, you don't know when real frauds like Cap'n Bobby are lying to you.
 
It takes months and months and months to implement an airline ECO. Something like the phone system will only be dealt with at a maintenance depot during a regular interval maintenance. The line maintenance guys have no training on that and wouldn't have time for it anyway.
 
I honestly admire those of you who are civil regarding the garbage that is spewed about Ted Olsen.
I remeber a comment by one high profile truther claiming that Ted had, "traded up" in regards to his new wife comparing her to Barbara.
Some truthers have a earned a well deserved repeated punch to the face.
I am not advocating only hoping.
 
See the date in the little red box in the bottom of the document? Notice that the tail of the G in page 1 is cut off? That happens when you try to photoshop paste a new date onto a document, Document is fraudulent. We went over this back in 2007 when you were a lil tiny bunny wet behind the ears.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=85833&page=3
Pace 1!!1!!!
AA757AMM01282001a.jpg


Bobert's point is a good one. The guy lost his wife and he gets slandered to no end, because he's part of the establishment.
 
Flapdoodle

Illuminati? You mean there actually is someone stupid enough to think they really exist?
Really?

Fonebone believes an 'illuminati' exists --
Fonebone has irrefutable proof of their existence !
Really --
I can't believe someone that posts on a public forum would be stupid
enough to utter such an asinine statement .
 
Fonebone believes an 'illuminati' exists --
Fonebone has irrefutable proof of their existence !
Really --
I can't believe someone that posts on a public forum would be stupid
enough to utter such an asinine statement .

Yet here I am. And my statement stands.

So, where's this irrefutable proof? I'm quite certain it only exists in your fevered imagination, since there is no Illuminati, and only people who either have brain damage or are amazingly stupid believe there is.

So pony up, dude. Prove me wrong.

Of course I have nothing to worry about. You can't post your imagination here.
 
Fonebone believes an 'illuminati' exists --
Fonebone has irrefutable proof of their existence !
Really --
I can't believe someone that posts on a public forum would be stupid
enough to utter such an asinine statement .

Yeah, who would be stupid enough to claim that the Illuminati exists and they have "irrefutable" proof of their existence?

Great post fonbone.
 
If I ever decide to market a portable mini reading-lamp to use in bed, I'll call it "The Illuminati" and get the Sham-Wow guy to pitch it for me on late-night TV.
 
Illuminati proven to exist irrefutably

JimBenArm > Illuminati? You mean there actually is someone stupid enough to think they really exist?
Really?

Fonebone believes an 'illuminati' exists --
Fonebone has irrefutable proof of their existence !
Really --
I can't believe someone that posts on a public forum would be stupid
enough to utter such an asinine statement .

Yet here I am. And my statement stands.

So, where's this irrefutable proof? I'm quite certain it only exists in your fevered imagination, since there is no Illuminati, and only people who either have brain damage or are amazingly stupid believe there is.

So pony up, dude. Prove me wrong.

Of course I have nothing to worry about. You can't post your imagination here.

Yet here I am. Irrefutable proof:
Webster's Columbia Encyclopedic Dictionary 1941 ed N Y
Page 362e ..............

Illuminati n. pl. A term formerly applied to certain sects and secret societies ,
now applied to persons who affect to possess extraordinary knowledge whether justly or otherwise.
 
Yet here I am. Irrefutable proof:
Webster's Columbia Encyclopedic Dictionary 1941 ed N Y
Page 362e ..............

Illuminati n. pl. A term formerly applied to certain sects and secret societies ,
now applied to persons who affect to possess extraordinary knowledge whether justly or otherwise.

Webster's said:
Main Entry: big·foot
Pronunciation: \ˈbig-ˌfu̇t\
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural big·feet \-ˌfēt\ or big·foots
Usage: often capitalized
Date: 1958
1 [from the size of the footprints ascribed to it] : sasquatch
2 : big shot

Is that proof bigfoot exists? If so, I know a few threads you could win right now.
 
Webster's eh ?

Is that proof bigfoot exists? If so, I know a few threads you could win right now.

Got a reference for that ?
I just looked up both terms in:
Webster's New Encyclopedic International Dictionary
Comprehensive edition 1974 NY

Bigfoot -no entry
Sasquatch -no entry

Are you trying to pull a fast one here AJ ?
I suggest you trade up to a 'grown-up ' dictionary -AKA a book
and see if you can locate those terms .
Then return and we can discuss if bigfoot and sasquatch exist ,bic ?

meanwhile --- circumstantial evidence of 'bigfoot's' existance
Big Foot
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/363814c5db6450a5a6.jpg[/qimg]
Phooey
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/363814c5d99acda815.jpg[/qimg]
Chewy
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/363814c5d9d3e56e54.gif[/qimg]
 
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bigfoot :rolleyes:

There's that in addition to you missing the point entirely.

ETA: What's up with all the old dictionary entries? Words and their meanings aren't static, they change over the course of time:

Webster's said:
Main Entry: il·lu·mi·na·ti
Pronunciation: \i-ˌlü-mə-ˈnä-tē\
Function: noun plural
Etymology: Italian & New Latin; Italian, from New Latin, from Latin, plural of illuminatus
Date: 1599
1 capitalized : any of various groups claiming special religious enlightenment
2 : persons who are or who claim to be unusually enlightened
3 : elite 1d <members of the academic illuminati>

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/illuminati :rolleyes: again.
 
Last edited:
Yet here I am. Irrefutable proof:
Webster's Columbia Encyclopedic Dictionary 1941 ed N Y
Page 362e ..............

Illuminati n. pl. A term formerly applied to certain sects and secret societies ,
now applied to persons who affect to possess extraordinary knowledge whether justly or otherwise.

My Shorter Oxford Dictionary has an entry for unicorn.Will I be seeing one in my garden anytime soon?
 
Yet here I am. Irrefutable proof:
Webster's Columbia Encyclopedic Dictionary 1941 ed N Y
Page 362e ..............

Illuminati n. pl. A term formerly applied to certain sects and secret societies ,
now applied to persons who affect to possess extraordinary knowledge whether justly or otherwise.

http://www.randi.org/encyclopedia/Illuminati.html

[SIZE=+0][SIZE=+0]Illuminati[/SIZE] An identification generally adopted since the fifteenth century by those who believe they have a special understanding of mystical, occult, and obscure matters. The official Order of the Illuminati, though it had its origins much earlier, was a secret society founded in May of 1776 by Bavarian university law professor Adam Weishaupt (1748-1811). Originally a group of republican freethinkers loosely related to the freemasonry movement, it really lasted only a decade or so, but interest in the group was happily rekindled later by authors such as Aleister Crowley and today a plethora of dunderhead conspiracy nuts such as Texe Marrs——publisher of “Power of Prophecy”——ascribe to these underground agents——as well as the freemasons movements——every sort of imaginable, rascally, devious, action against humanity.
Certainly, the Illuminati notion must be the most adaptable and wide-reaching of all conspiracy theories. It takes in such subjects as communism, the French Revolution, kabala, the Ku Klux Klan, the Mafia, magic, pyramids, Satanism, spoon-bending, Stonehenge, UFOs, witchcraft, Zionism, and many other silly pursuits and philosophies. The UK’s David Icke who has never hesitated to plunge into any conspiracy idea, has declared that the Illuminati are reptilian aliens.
[/SIZE]
 

Back
Top Bottom