Always Free
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2002
- Messages
- 406
I'd like to see cold fusion, and, gravity conquered!
Nanotechnology is in and of itself quite plausible, but some of the things that have been suggested it can achieve simply won't work. I'll see if I can dig up a good on-line reference.BillyJoe said:Okay PixyMisa,
It seems you are too good for me.
(Doesn't necessarily mean that you aren't badly wrong though.)
Your take is that nanotechnology is science fantasy rather than science fiction because of the energy requirements. I hope you are right because nanotechnology (and computational singularity) have been used by various authors in "End Times" scenarios.
Which is true, but my point is it doesn't matter if the robots act up, since we'll be tinkering with ourselves at the same time so we'll be every bit as smart as they areHowever, I am not sure about your point about "humans also having near infinite computing power augmented by self-replicating nano-machines". My point was that they will lose control as soon as they try to produce computers/robots that exceed them in intelligence. The only way to do that is to enable them to rewire their own hardware. Then, any instruction hardwired into the robot not to harm humans will not be worth the paper it was not written on.
I'd settle for hot fusion. (Sustained, safe, reliable electricity generation using fusion of commonly available isotopes.)Always Free said:I'd like to see cold fusion
I'm working on violating the Second Law of Thermodynamics. (I should say, violating it on a usefully large scale.) Then the First. Then if I have time, the Zeroth, just for fun.and, gravity conquered!
PixyMisa said:I'd settle for hot fusion. (Sustained, safe, reliable electricity generation using fusion of commonly available isotopes.)
I'm working on violating the Second Law of Thermodynamics. (I should say, violating it on a usefully large scale.) Then the First. Then if I have time, the Zeroth, just for fun. [/B]
As I said, I hope that is true. And I would like a good online reference because, obviously, I 've come across only one side of the story so far.PixyMisa said:Nanotechnology is in and of itself quite plausible, but some of the things that have been suggested it can achieve simply won't work. I'll see if I can dig up a good on-line reference.
Ah, now I see.....I told you you were too good for me.PixyMisa said:....my point is it doesn't matter if the robots act up, since we'll be tinkering with ourselves at the same time so we'll be every bit as smart as they are![]()