Technical and Technical IP questions for Ion

Soapy Sam said:
jj- Leaving insults aside, what will it prove if Ion does or does not have a publication record?

It will mean that his prior work can be examined, as well as his own behavior.

He clearly knows a great deal about this stuff by comparison with most of us, or you would not have been arguing with him for days.

No, actually, it's not clear he does. It's clear he's willing to lie about things a lot.

We all know that you know your stuff. I begin to suspect Ion is someone out purely to wind you up. In which case he is doing a fair job.
Click to expand...
Well, I have an obligation to deal with misinformation. He's spreading a great lot of misinformation, and depending on others' ignorance not to notice.
 
Well, all I can say is that it's the rest of the world, including the inventors of the algorithms, against Ion, who claims to know better than everyone else.

But Ion, of course, won't even cite his own publications.

Why would he be unwilling to cite his work?

What's wrong?

Cite your work, Ion, and provide us with some evidence that who you say is you is really you, so we don't have to wonder if you're taking credit from someone else like you tried to do with Cooley and Tukey.
 
jj said:

Well, I have an obligation to deal with misinformation....
Click to expand...
You know what?

The F.F.T. definition that I gave is correct (see Oppenheim and Schaffer in English and many books in many languages), and the definition that you gave is wrong in defining F.F.T. by F.F.T. (like defining blond by blond).

You are a phony.
 
Ion said:
The F.F.T. definition that I gave is correct (see Oppenheim and Schaffer in English and many books in many languages), and the definition that you gave is wrong in defining F.F.T. by F.F.T. (like defining blond by blond).

Your statement is nonsense, unless you suggest that an FFT does not produce the same results as the same DFT. I'm quite sure that Ron would be astonished to hear that, too.

Now, we all know, you included, that you engaged in unethical, dishonest selective quoting when you originally isolated the comment about the FFT from the context of efficiency, so we know that your original claim of a "mistake" was maliciously and willfully constructed on your part, by selective quoting and removal of context from my statements. This, alone, proves the punitive nature of your actions.

What makes this even more laughable is that the complaint you've chosen to illicitly construct and then pursue is utterly, astonishingly wrong. If an FFT isn't built of smaller FFT's, then why is one of the most famous recursive implimentations exactly that? The answer, of course, is once again that my statement, even after your unethical abridgement and extraction from context, is still utterly, absolutely, and perfectly correct. Again, you seek to use the ignorance of the audience to mislead, and in doing so, demonstrate serious ethical misbehavior.

Your attempted confusion of valid inductive reasoning with circular reasoning is noted.

You are a phony.
Click to expand...

You, who can't or won't cite a single paper to prove your own existance, let alone expertise, accuse someone else of being a phony?

Well, come on, point us to your CV, or publish it here. Provide some proof that the CV you cite is you, as well.

Put up or shut up.
 
jj said:


You, who can't or won't cite a single paper to prove your own existance, let alone expertise, accuse someone else of being a phony?

Well, come on, point us to your CV, or publish it here. Provide some proof that the CV you cite is you, as well.

Put up or shut up.
Click to expand...
This is the only part that I can quote from you since like a dumb you write inside my quotes, and this part that I can quote is not worthy.
 
Ion said:

This is the only part that I can quote from you since like a dumb you write inside my quotes, and this part that I can quote is not worthy.
Click to expand...

Cite or cease.
 
Ion said:
Not from me to you.

I am joking about your threat.
Click to expand...

Ok, I've waited a week. You haven't done your civic duty regarding your claim about my alleged threat, obviously, since I haven't heard anything.

Do your duty! Show your backbone, lad, and back up your claims!
 
TillEulenspiegel said:
Jesus is this corpse still animated?
Click to expand...

Since WOTS is trying the same kinds of behaviors on Rolfe, maybe I should ressurrect this rotting zombie just for instructive value.

How about it, Ion, hiding behind a nom-de-plume. Afraid to come out and play in the real world? Does the fear of exposure still grab you by the throat at 4AM?

You claimed you had published papers. Provide author, title, journal, page, etc, full cites, please, including evidence as to which of the authors you are.

Stand and deliver, dude, stand and deliver.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom