Sword_Of_Truth
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- May 8, 2006
- Messages
- 11,494
ODS thrives.
You don't have to take everything 100% literally.
ODS thrives.
And that, my friend, is probably giving the democrats nightmares.
That was what cost Al Gore Florida in 2000. Disaffected hard lefties went for Ralph Nader and it only took a few hundred to throw the election to Bush.
If the Green/Nader vote went to Gore, the last eight years would never have happened (9/11 would still have happened, but Gore would have surrendered to Bin Laden and we'd have had 6+ years of adjustment time to life under the Islamic Caliphate behind us by now).
Obama has until November 2012 to turn the United States into an island in the Gulag Archipelago or else it could happen again.
I just finished watching the end of the Tea Party Convention...
Joseph Farrah was the keynote speaker tonight.
After railing on about the absence of President Obama's birth certificate, he went on to talk about how our country needs to return to the Bible, and follow Christ's teachings.
that is very....very sad. this and Palin's appearance may mean the end of the "Tea Baggers" and anything but a bunch of loony tunes.
Are you really calling people in favour of the insurance industry approved and relatively conservative health car bill, "angry hard lefties"?Are democrats threatened by angry hard lefties who feel betrayed by Obamas failure thus far to deliver what they feel they've been promised?
That's very specific. Citation?How about the democrats unload the 61% of thier (sic) members who thought at one time or another that 9/11 was an inside job?
The Tea Party convention, doesn't actually represent the Tea Party. Its an attempt to cash in on some of them from what I've been reading.
You don't have to take everything 100% literally.
That's very specific. Citation?
Democrats in America are evenly divided on the question of whether George W. Bush knew about the 9/11 terrorist attacks in advance. Thirty-five percent (35%) of Democrats believe he did know, 39% say he did not know, and 26% are not sure.
Oops, sorry. Ignore my previous question.
Are you really calling people in favour of the insurance industry approved and relatively conservative health car bill, "angry hard lefties"?
Some people on this forum really don't understand how far out they are.
The Tea Party convention, doesn't actually represent the Tea Party. Its [sic] an attempt to cash in on some of them from what I've been reading.
Really, "very specific", really? 26% weren't sure, how is that specific?Right here.
35 + 26 = 61.
This isn't a democrat thing, it isn't a republican thing. It's a human thing. We're generally rather silly creatures and our biases drives to do or believe silly things regardless of our affiliations.
"Turning the United States into a Gulag" was a rhetorical flourish, but the 61% was very specific and you were wll within your rights to ask.
When asked what the true Tea Party is, about the only agreement is that it's not a party. (Well--at least the only agreement among some Tea Party members--but these are obviously the trueScotsmenTea Partisans.)
will the Tea Party seek to become an actual party and put their own candidates into elections?
or will they just try to make the GOP as loony and righty as possible?
it seems the latter is their way right now. to turn the Republican Party into the Republikaner Party.
The tea party didn't surface or start squawking until it was clear that Obama was going to win. And judging by the rhetoric coming out of the convention, I think the platform of the tea partier is: "One culture in this one nation under the Christian god as defined by the fundamentalist movement"Having a Tea Party convention is on its face..... dumb? The Tea Party is a meta-party. There is no actual platform. Its a single issue meta-party from what I can tell whose issue is the runaway spending problems of the two major parties.