crimresearch
Alumbrado
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2004
- Messages
- 10,600
Tmy said:The concearn over less than lethal weapons is that the police will be trigger happy since they figure no one will get killed.
In Boston after the big Red SOx win the police had to deal with rowdy fans in the street. A women was killed when she was hit in the eye by one of those "usually not leathal" rubber bullets or sumthin. It caused quite a contraversy. Espeically since the cop wasnt trained on how to use the thing. (can you say "lawsuit".)
Where exactly is your link to the information that the officer in Boston wasn't trained?
All I can find is that he was "...certified to train officers on the use of the weapon"
http://www.insidedenver.com/drmn/rockies/article/0,1299,DRMN_19_3326179,00.html
And "...certified as a trainer to instruct on the use of the weapon."
http://nsnlb.us.publicus.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20041114/NEWS02/111140070/-1/news
And "An eight-year Boston police veteran who is a certified instructor in the use of a ``less-lethal'' pepper-spray gun..."
http://news.bostonherald.com/localRegional/view.bg?articleid=53869
It would pretty unusual for a major department like Boston to pay for instructor certification for this officer, but to refuse to allow him to be trained on how to use it himself as you allege.