• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

TAM London 2010 impressions

I hated every second of it.
:D
I really enjoyed it.
It was my first TAM. One of the main reasons I loved it so much was that I got to meet a lot of people who I've been talking to on the internet for so long.
Excellent to finally meet them, and more people who were following me.
I particularly enjoyed the Amateur Transplants and Tim Minchin's performances.
It was also awesome to meet the speakers and get photos with them :P
That reminds me, the Amateur Transplants were very good, and the awards were another high point. Good to see Ben Goldacre getting one, and that nice young lad got one too... ;)
 
I preferred the theatre-like seating at last year's TAM London, but apart from that, the venue was much, much better. Prices at the bar were outrageous, that was a bit annoying, but at least there was a bar. I don't think there will ever be a South Point-like venue in London.

Regarding the speakers: I was pretty happy with the mix. Quite a few people I had never heard about, but was well entertained by, and only two I had heard talks by before. I would have liked Tim Minchin to spend more time performing and less time talking, but after hearing Jon Ronson rap I already felt like the evening had been worth the price of admission.

Oh, and I got to take a lot of photographs of skeptical celebrities holding a sock (see here: http://plixi.com/p/51502528). :)
 
TAM London II was great, met a lot of great people, listened to lots of interesting speakers and cursed myself for forgetting bringing my books for Alan Moore to sign.

And if somebody can find the person who infected me so I had to endure a rather painful flight home (clogged up sinuses + pressure difference = pain), I would be most grateful
 
TAM London II was great, met a lot of great people, listened to lots of interesting speakers and cursed myself for forgetting bringing my books for Alan Moore to sign.

And if somebody can find the person who infected me so I had to endure a rather painful flight home (clogged up sinuses + pressure difference = pain), I would be most grateful
I also began suffering a cold this morning, which is now worsening. I suppose it's inevitable when gathering a thousand people from around the world in one room.

BTW, I preferred your post before you edited it. I can just picture Alan Moore singing the text from your books, and it is a comical image.
 
Just home, via Slough, Cardiff and various other places. A memorable weekend.

Coincidence is sometimes over stressed, but meeting Morwen outside the hotel on Friday morning was pretty improbable. As were the parrots in Hyde Park, which Randi identified from a photograph. (Who knew he was a parrot expert as well as everything else?)

The single most memorable image I will take away is the neutrino image of the sun (you can see it here-) http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/ which Marcus Chown showed in his talk. If that's not sufficiently advanced technology to be magical, I don't know what is.

I really enjoyed Sue Blackmore's autobiographical account of her conversion from believer in the paranormal to sceptic. Richard Dawkins' attempt to replace the classics with evolution as a core element of education is, I fear, apt to be stillborn, but it's a fine idea for all that.

I managed to get Randi's support in renaming "Pee-Zee-Myers" "Pee Zed" to fit UK labelling standards. I was amused to see he actually included the "Pee-Zed" spelling on one of his powerpoint slides.

As a UK Sceptic, maybe the most significant speeches for me came from people associated with the Libel Law Campaign -Jack of Kent, Simon Singh and Tracey Brown of Sense about Science. I'm already an SaS supporter, so I'm extremely intrigued by the idea of the "Nightingale Collaboration" (see Martin Robbins' comment here)- http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/the-lay-scientist/2010/oct/16/1 This is one to watch for.

Maybe the biggest surprise I had at TAML was the discovery of comic culture. Morwen and Zooterkin knew all about Alan Moore and Melinda Gebbie - both new names to me.
Gebbie's talk was interesting enough to have me hunting for a copy of "The Lost Girls" as a birthday present for a woman friend - and Moore's poem about his hometown was a wonderful description of a place, it's people and it's history. It was like listening to Betjeman on suburbia. "Psychohistory" I knew about. "Psychogeography" came as a fresh surprise.

You never know what's coming at you at TAM. TAML was no exception. Wierd, unexpected, but never dull.
 
Last edited:
My impressions of Tam London?

*Whips out guitar*

Baby you're all that I want
When you're lying here in my arms
I'm finding it hard to believe
You're Eleven.


(Allllllll awesome)
 
Wednesday morning after TAM London, still sick. Still had a good time though :)

And yes, jokes about paedophilia are always entertaining. Loved Tim Minchin sining the pope song live on Saturday night
 
It was my first skeptical event and I thoroughly enjoyed it.

I thought the venue was good, particularly as I was staying in the hotel. A sloping lecture theatre seating arrangement would be better as the view was pretty bad.

I loved Dawkins.

Coffee at Costa at £3.35 a pop is ridiculous.

I thought the Lost Girls talk was pretty irrelevant.

Andy
 
I didn't find them spectacular, but they were just light entertainment to fill in time. I was a little annoyed that, unless I missed the acknowedgement, they did an adaptation of Tom Lehrer's elements song, including the line about there being a quiz afterwards, without any acknowledgement of that.
 
we three really enjoyed the whole two days...it passed in a flash. Eating arrangements were a bit unfortunate,i think they needed more food stations....but it was very good food.

Don`t think we will ever be able to afford it again (coming from Ultima thule) maybe JREF could consider live streaming next year...we would be willing to pay a subscription for it.
 
I think it's the best TAM I've been to yet.

I understand what people say about the flat format, but I think that the non-stage based format brings everyone down to the same level, rather than the us-and-them feel of the sloped theatre arrangement.

Then again, I'm tall, so it doesn't affect me much. I always made sure that I sat on the end of a row, so hopefully I didn't block anyone's view.

London is great in that it's close to a lot of places. Sadly it's expensive, which means people often don't stay long, unlike vegas where people will tend to hang about for a week or so - fringe events often tend to have to be close to the weekend where they fight for time or space, or are further out, and attended mostly by locals.

I hope TAM doesn't become too atheism focussed... it's a popular topic, but I worry that religion doesn't actually affect us as much in the UK as in the USA, and perhaps we have bigger fish to fry. I was a little worried about the question where PZ Myers was asked about a physics professor who was an evangelical Christian.. I would have asked the questioner if he had a problem with the science.

My hope for next year is that I can run a fringe event that creates more of a two way exchange, rather than a place to come and see high profile people. It won't be on the Friday or the Monday though... it'll be a quick fire talk format where anyone can take the floor.

Sorry to all of you who I barely got a chance to speak to.... I think perhaps a forum get together might be in order for next year.. the breaks during the day weren't long enough to sit down and natter.... was always dashing off to check in and out of hotels. Perhaps next year I won't stay at 4 different hotels.
 
So anyway, here is a subset of comments about my TAM London 2010 impressions.

Some photos can be found here: http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=233486&id=530824732&l=39a3e7af2b

First of all, it was, in fact, very amazingly awesome! Anything that I "complain" about, below, are really relatively minor issues, that barely need to be picked on. If it sounds like I am ranting in any part of this, it is only by accident.

London is a very nice city. Unfortunately, my time there was much shorter than I wanted it to be. So, I will probably be returning in a couple of months, even though a lot of the cheeses have weird names. I had originally booked a tour of the city, followed by some parts of Europe after TAM. But, obligations in the States forced me to postpone those plans.

Richard Wiseman was a most excellent host! Witty, and always great with a comeback when technical difficulties prevent things from working smoothly.

James Randi was looking hale and hearty, for his age. But, believe it or not, as amazing as he is, I really didn't trek all that distance just to meet him.

It was especially great see Susan Blackmore, one of my favorite authors of books about the brain. Although slightly repetitive, her history with woo sheds good insight into how she approaches the mind, today.

One of my most favorite presentations was from Richard Dawkins, building an argument that the theory of evolution could, itself, be considered "The New Classics". There weren't any particularly novel arguments in his case. But, they served as a good collection of "Best Of" reasons to study the science. I wish he did something like that for TAM8. All Vegas got was a couple of interviews and (if you were in the VIP luncheon) a relatively fancy meal conversation (though, he didn't even say a lot, there).

Amateur Transplants: Meh.

The first panel, about activism, was not terribly well organized. The mini-presentations went on too long from its members. And that Q&A was all mixed up and rushed through. At least it had some educational value, even if it was not exactly what I would call a "panel".

Tim Minchin did not do very many songs. But, the few he did were masterfully offensive! (And, I mean that as a compliment.) His short film is definitely on the right track, even if it was only a "beta version".
Some of the performers who came on before him were a mixed bag.

More about the Amateur Transplants: I guess I am not a fan of one-liner, heavily-pun-influenced songs. But, I have heard worse. Lots worse. So, that is why I rate them as "mediocre": Not bad. Not by any means. Just not all that great.
I thought I liked one of their songs very much: "The Anaesthetist's Hymn", so I bought one of their albums that has it on it. Listening to it, again, I do not remember exactly what the appeal was, anymore. But, it was worth buying if only because one of them autographed it with the message "Mitch Lampert is Meh". (Apparently, they had already discovered my Twitter feed.)

Marcus Chown really shined when he rattled off his "Top 10 Bonkers Facts About the Universe". But, he really wasted time with those pointless musical montages.

D.J. Grothe really spoke from his heart. His message was very good, I am sure. But, it was very redundant to the one he gave at NECSS, so I ended up not paying much attention to it. Sorry.

The second panel, moderated by Rebecca Watson (who knew she could do anything in moderation?!), about technology, was more like a real panel! Since I am already steeped in this technology stuff, I probably did not gain much from it, myself. Though, I imagine other people did.

I would have liked to have seen Stephen Fry in person, but I suppose the video interview will have to suffice until I can afford to hire him for my next party.

PZ Meyers is NOT a fuzzy teddy bear. He's ANGRY!!!!!!!!!
Don't mess with the P-Zed!

The elusive and imposing beast that is Alan Moore was probably the weirdest presenter ever to appear at any TAM. That is not necessarily a bad thing: It was an honor to tremble in his foreboding presence, after all. But, I wonder what all this had to do with skepticism.

There were several other speakers I have not commented on, yet. They were all very interesting. Perhaps when I have more time, I will elaborate on some of their things.

I came too late for food at the After Show Party. But, at least it offered a great source of interesting conversations, and loud music.

The WORST THING that happened all weekend: It seems I accidentally lost my program guide, somehow. :( It had Tim Minchin's autograph in it, too. I have everything else that was in my goody bag, I think. I never lost anything else, before, at any conference. So, this minor issue remains a black mark on my otherwise spotless record. I will try to ask for a replacement (even if it was not scribbled on by Minchin). But, if anyone else happens to know anything about its fate let me know! Anyhoo... that is how you know it was a great event! Mourning the loss of a program guide is the only suffering it gave me.

At this point in time, I am on the fence as to whether I will return to TAM London 2011. It is very tempting. But, there are sooo many similar events in The States, it might lose out simply because of the diminishing returns imposed by those.
 
we three really enjoyed the whole two days...it passed in a flash. Eating arrangements were a bit unfortunate,i think they needed more food stations....

Yeah, too many people, not enough stations, some of the help could barely speak English - "What is on this sandwich?"...."Yes, sandwich"..."Yes, I know what it is, what is on it?"...."Sandwich, yes"

but it was very good food.

You must have been in a different venue than me. :eek:
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom