Dave Rogers
Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through
I will be honest here and tell you that I am looking at another possibility that Dave Rogers, Ryan Mackey, and others have brought up. That is if the impacts are spread out over a long enough period of time then the continued fall could compensate for the velocity loss. This needs to be done with the precise measurements of the tilt vs. drop timing, which we now have. So we will see. I have to admit that I am rather dissappointed that those who have brought this up haven't done any precision measurements and calculations to prove the point, other than Dave Rogers' claim that he did while refusing to show his data.
This is the most promising thing you've ever said here. I look forward to your calculations.
I've said before that I didn't make any measurements of the collapse rate. All I did was look up the column positions, approximate column strengths using an overall FoS of 3x, and approximate column resistance assuming a linear increase to the ultimate strength at 0.15% compression and then constant strength up to 15% compression. The rest is simple trigonometry and Newtonian mechanics. It's a trivial piece of arithmetic, and I've shown the methodology and results here. This is how papers are generally written; the methodology is described in sufficient detail for another worker to replicate the results, and the results are then published. I don't recall you publishing the intermediate steps of any of your calculations; it's simply not necessary.
Dave
Last edited: