No, Tony, we are at an impasse, but it's one of your making.
I'm asking these questions for a simple reason. You seem to think you have this singular insight into the WTC collapses. We all think it's total garbage, but you've decided not to listen to us. That's fine. I can't make you believe anything, even things that should be obvious.
So, what next?
I think the best thing for you to do is to step outside your little circle of conspiracy nuts. Obviously you're not willing to listen to us, so who are you going to listen to? You need someone, hopefully many people, with technical background, recognized expertise, and an understanding of structural mechanics. It doesn't have to be us, it doesn't have to be anyone I know or have ever spoken to.
The smart place, as I've mentioned numerous times, is to talk to actual academics. The smart move is to organize and prepare your thoughts and submit it for critical review. Now, you've already written a series of whitepapers, so you've already done the hard part. Next you need to get these in front of professors.
One way is through peer review. You stated in this thread that you're not willing to do that, citing some vague and unsupported belief that it'll be instantly rejected for political reasons. That's a wimpy excuse and you know it. However, you can also take a less high-energy approach -- conferences, for one, or just talk to college departments. Send it to professors. See what they have to say.
If you have any real interest in understanding whether or not you're right and the world is wrong, you need to do this. And while you're at it, report on your progress. Tell us who you sent it to and what their responses were. Tell us what you've learned. All it takes at this point is a few e-mails and phone calls!
Of course, if you actually have no interest other than preserving your indignant little fantasy, then you won't do this. Since you've been at this for years, I will be astonished if you behave otherwise.
And, needless to say, discussing it with those already professing a known bias isn't good enough. Science works for everyone, crackpottery only works for your friends.
In summary, whether or not we're done is up to you. If you choose to leave it there, then you will have accomplished absolutely nothing. Your choice.
