Sylvia Browne useless again: Rochelle Robinson and Michael Johnston

[monoman]

These past cases are very relevant because they show that Brown, far from being partially right, as might reasonably be expected from guessing, has never been right.

Besides, for the new blood joining the forum everyday, I think it's far better for them to be able to read and respond rather than being presented with a page full of links to various debunking sites.

 

[remirol]

These past cases are very relevant because they show that Brown, far from being partially right, as might reasonably be expected from guessing, has never been right.

See response to Joe above.

Besides, for the new blood joining the forum everyday, I think it's far better for them to be able to read and respond rather than being presented with a page full of links to various debunking sites.

I contend that a sticky-thread similar to the ones in the 9/11 CT section would actually be far more effective for them to read, as it wouldn't fall off the front page in a day or two. (Besides, it would only be a link to a single site -- Robert's -- as far as I know. Are there any other sites that are even remotely as comprehensive as his for providing information?)

Please do not ignore Mod warnings...

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Locknar

 

[Questioninggeller]

This:

Good example of how to respond to criticism like a mature adult.

Followed by this:

I'm sorry, did you say anything worth reading?

Is consistency too hard?

I contend that a sticky-thread similar to the ones in the 9/11 CT section would actually be far more effective for them to read, as it wouldn't fall off the front page in a day or two. (Besides, it would only be a link to a single site -- Robert's -- as far as I know. Are there any other sites that are even remotely as comprehensive as his for providing information?)

You are having a hard time understanding people's above posts, seriously. These threads are where people work together compiling and discussing evidence. These discussions and citations are what informs people on this forum of specific issues . Sometimes the discussions are turned into articles on Robert's website, Claus' website, EeneyMinnieMoe's website, and many others.

You've stated your opinion, albeit rather obtusely and rudely. I hope you're done insulting people and are ready to move on.

 

[Audible Click]

http://www.badpsychics.co.uk/

This is a good website for info on many psychics and they do have a link to Robert Lancaster's site. I still think that the Sylvia Browne threads in this forum are a very good resource for those of us that follow her trail of failure.

 

[Minarvia]

These threads are indeed informative and I for one appreciate them. Too often there aren't any followups to a "psychic's" predictions and/or "information." QG is doing just that and the amount of time and passion to do it must be amazing. Kudos!

I wonder how long the families wait and wait before finally realizing their hopes are in vain. In my family my great-grandfather was murdered many decades ago and the perp never found. There are family alive today who would indeed care in 2009 if the case was solved.