• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Surviving 2023: Coronavirus, Plague and the Global Flood

gilius

Thinker
Joined
Mar 29, 2015
Messages
243
Here's proof - using only empirical evidence - that the oligarchs who control the media, banking, technology and entertainment industries are preparing to unleash an ebola-like plague + global flood on most of the world come 2023. Not only that - but it will be impossible to survive due to extreme weather conditions, toxic air, rising sea level and the death of trees, flowers and other plants. Also this project has been in the works since at least the 1950s when NASA was founded and JFK gave his famous speech on Secret Societies.

Please discuss the evidence in my video minus any ad-hominem attacks...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGHuFTvXC-k
 
Last edited:
Tell me more about JFK's famous speech on secret societies.

Is that the one where he said, "[w]e choose to join the Freemasons. We choose to join the Freemasons in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard"?
 
Last edited:
Here's proof - ... JFK gave his famous speech on Secret Societies. ...
You are joking, do you know who he gave the speech to, the purpose, and why? I predict No.

JFK was not talking about the stuff appearing in your conspiracy theories the video of woo, he was contrasting closed societies like the USSR vs our open society and media responsibility ... thus, not evidence for world ending woo conspiracy.


https://www.jfklibrary.org/archives...can-newspaper-publishers-association-19610427


There was no evidence in your video... Is that your video, or was this a parody thread?
 
Here's proof - using only empirical evidence - that the oligarchs who control the media, banking, technology and entertainment industries are preparing to unleash an ebola-like plague + global flood on most of the world come 2023. Not only that - but it will be impossible to survive due to extreme weather conditions, toxic air, rising sea level and the death of trees, flowers and other plants. Also this project has been in the works since at least the 1950s when NASA was founded and JFK gave his famous speech on Secret Societies.

Please discuss the evidence in my video minus any ad-hominem attacks...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGHuFTvXC-k

There's no way in hell I'm watching that video. I'm actively hostile towards demands such as this, so don't even think about pissing me off.

Your claims sound like pure kookery. By all means discuss it some more, if you think you can do so without appeals to paranoia, ignorance, and soft-headeness. My hopes are not high.
 
The JFK part isn't covered in the video - but will be in part 2 if I get to make it - depends on whether there's any intelligent discussions relating to part 1, which takes the project back to only 1979 when in fact my research has taken it back further, to 1956 (and counting).

So far there hasn't been any meaningful discussions about the evidence presented in part 1 since it was published on YouTube; people seem incapable of understanding propaganda, and if there are any viewers, say, out of the 25 who clicked "like" - who do truly understand what awaits mankind - they have yet to reveal themselves or show that they grasp the concepts.
 
Last edited:
The JFK part isn't covered in the video - but will be in part 2 if I get to make it - depends on whether there's any intelligent discussions relating to part 1, which takes the project back to only 1979 when in fact my research has taken it back further, to 1956 (and counting).

So far there hasn't been any meaningful discussions about the evidence presented in part 1 since it was published on YouTube; people seem incapable of understanding propaganda, and if there are any viewers, say, out of the 25 who clicked "like" - who do truly understand what awaits mankind - they have yet to reveal themselves or show that they grasp the concepts.

You've gotten 3225 views what are you complaining about?
 
The JFK part isn't covered in the video - but will be in part 2 if I get to make it - depends on whether there's any intelligent discussions relating to part 1, which takes the project back to only 1979 when in fact my research has taken it back further, to 1956 (and counting).

So far there hasn't been any meaningful discussions about the evidence presented in part 1 since it was published on YouTube; people seem incapable of understanding propaganda, and if there are any viewers, say, out of the 25 who clicked "like" - who do truly understand what awaits mankind - they have yet to reveal themselves or show that they grasp the concepts.

There is no meaningful evidence in the video of woo.
Thus:
There is no way to discuss BS (aka the woo in the video) in a meaningful way.
And:
No need to Part 2, JFK was will not be evidence for videos filled with meaningless woo.

Youtube likes? that is not meaningful
 
I think 99% of the 3K views are people who have turned the video off after only 5 minutes or so, hence no resulting discussions. One guy claimed he watched it 3 times - but when I tested him on the Jurassic Park slides in the deck his answer showed that he was lying; he hadn't properly watched the video at all nor understood it.
 
There's no way in hell I'm watching that video. I'm actively hostile towards demands such as this, so don't even think about pissing me off.

Your claims sound like pure kookery. By all means discuss it some more, if you think you can do so without appeals to paranoia, ignorance, and soft-headeness. My hopes are not high.

This. Seriously, why is it that just about every CT kook out there starts out with a demand to "watch this video!" Sorry, gilius, no, you don't get to come on a discussion forum and make the rules for discussion by limiting it to only what is on your video. I mean, this sounds like pretty important stuff (by 2023!); by saying the only "meaningful discussions" can be based on evidence as presented in the video, you make it sound like the video is the only really meaningful and important stuff, and what you really want is an opportunity to preach from it.

If you have something to say, say it. If it's important enough, you can do it without the video. If you can't, then by all means, declare victory, take your ball, and go home.
 
Yeah, seriously, no.

If you want to make claims, write them down.

I'm not going to watch a video of someone droning on...

Better luck with your next get-rich-quick scheme.
 
This. Seriously, why is it that just about every CT kook out there starts out with a demand to "watch this video!" Sorry, gilius, no, you don't get to come on a discussion forum and make the rules for discussion by limiting it to only what is on your video. I mean, this sounds like pretty important stuff (by 2023!); by saying the only "meaningful discussions" can be based on evidence as presented in the video, you make it sound like the video is the only really meaningful and important stuff, and what you really want is an opportunity to preach from it.

If you have something to say, say it. If it's important enough, you can do it without the video. If you can't, then by all means, declare victory, take your ball, and go home.
turingtest, I think you've misunderstood. I started this topic with the aim of limiting discussions only on the subject matter, i.e. the evidence compiled in my video - unless you would prefer it as a PowerPoint deck or some such. If you wish to discuss something else then we can start a new, more open, topic; how does that sound?

I made the video - not to preach - but with the intention of recruiting members as part of a team to survive for the 22 years that the weather machine will be operated for prior to official declaration of the New World Order. The elite are aiming for complete human extinction in the West - but since we have 3 years to prepare then we can get through those 22 years if we have enough supply of food and oxygen? We would then become famous later on in life and get interviewed by representatives from the East as being the only survivors of the West. We can then tell them the story of how everyone was applauding for the NHS at 8pm and celebrating with rainbows - not knowing that they were really clapping for the opening of the firmament to let in additional water to flood the Earth, i.e. for their own self-sacrifice.

[imgw=640]https://i.postimg.cc/4Nj5w7vW/eyes24.png[/imgw]

We are lucky the elite have waited so long to push the on/off switch - in excess of 60 years - lucky to be alive, in fact, as they could have let loose the airborne ebola + flooding prior to the 1960s if they wanted to. That was before most of us were even thought of.

[imgw=640]https://i.postimg.cc/mDdJ8YSP/eyeswideshut.png[/imgw]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think 99% of the 3K views are people who have turned the video off after only 5 minutes or so, hence no resulting discussions. One guy claimed he watched it 3 times - but when I tested him on the Jurassic Park slides in the deck his answer showed that he was lying; he hadn't properly watched the video at all nor understood it.

Well, the music IS a little bit overbearing.
 
turingtest, I think you've misunderstood. I started this topic with the aim of limiting discussions only on the subject matter, i.e. the evidence compiled in my video - unless you would prefer it as a PowerPoint deck or some such

I think you will find that we all pretty much prefer it as posts consisting of a few paragraphs of text, with links to more detailed texts supporting specific claims.

I know you went to a lot of trouble to compile all your evidence in video form. I'm very sorry that nobody here is very interested in that format.

One reason I like text is that it's easy to find, review, and cite specific claims. You make a post, I can copy and paste the text of that post for reference.

I can also read and re-read text at my own pace. I can skim for interesting passages, go back and read for more detail, etc. This is much better for me than having to watch a video where everything is presented at whatever pace the producer thinks is best.

I'll be honest: Unless you're a professional video producer, your videos probably aren't well-enough paced or organized to be worth the effort of watching. Not for something as complex and contentious as your claims.

Putting them in writing, here, gives me a chance to re-organize and re-pace your claims for ease of comprehension. Or not. But at least that way we're having a written conversation that can develop over time.

So yeah. YouTube, no. PowerPoint, also no. Text like this post right here that you're reading right now, very yes.
 
I think you will find that we all pretty much prefer it as posts consisting of a few paragraphs of text, with links to more detailed texts supporting specific claims.

I know you went to a lot of trouble to compile all your evidence in video form. I'm very sorry that nobody here is very interested in that format.

One reason I like text is that it's easy to find, review, and cite specific claims. You make a post, I can copy and paste the text of that post for reference.

I can also read and re-read text at my own pace. I can skim for interesting passages, go back and read for more detail, etc. This is much better for me than having to watch a video where everything is presented at whatever pace the producer thinks is best.

I'll be honest: Unless you're a professional video producer, your videos probably aren't well-enough paced or organized to be worth the effort of watching. Not for something as complex and contentious as your claims.

Putting them in writing, here, gives me a chance to re-organize and re-pace your claims for ease of comprehension. Or not. But at least that way we're having a written conversation that can develop over time.

So yeah. YouTube, no. PowerPoint, also no. Text like this post right here that you're reading right now, very yes.
Unfortunately, it's not that kind of evidence, and there is nothing to cite - for it happens to be entirely my original work/research. Picture it more like CCTV evidence - why go to all the trouble to transcribe it? A picture says a thousand words so to speak.

You can pause the video if it's going too fast.
 
Last edited:
turingtest, I think you've misunderstood. I started this topic with the aim of limiting discussions only on the subject matter, i.e. the evidence compiled in my video - unless you would prefer it as a PowerPoint deck or some such. If you wish to discuss something else then we can start a new, more open, topic; how does that sound?

I made the video - not to preach - but with the intention of recruiting members as part of a team to survive for the 22 years that the weather machine will be operated for prior to official declaration of the New World Order. The elite are aiming for complete human extinction in the West - but since we have 3 years to prepare then we can get through those 22 years if we have enough supply of food and oxygen? We would then become famous later on in life and get interviewed by representatives from the East as being the only survivors of the West. We can then tell them the story of how everyone was applauding for the NHS at 8pm and celebrating with rainbows - not knowing that they were really clapping for the opening of the firmament to let in additional water to flood the Earth, i.e. for their own self-sacrifice.

[qimg]https://i.postimg.cc/4Nj5w7vW/eyes24.png[/qimg]

We are lucky the elite have waited so long to push the on/off switch - in excess of 60 years - lucky to be alive, in fact, as they could have let loose the airborne ebola + flooding prior to the 1960s if they wanted to. That was before most of us were even thought of.

[qimg]https://i.postimg.cc/mDdJ8YSP/eyeswideshut.png[/qimg]

Well, alrighty then- good luck with all that.
Edited by zooterkin: 
<SNIP>
Edited for rule 0 and rule 12.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, alrighty then- good luck with all that.
Edited by zooterkin: 
<SNIP>
Edited for rule 0 and rule 12.
Brother, I need you on-board - otherwise if we don't work together as a team - then we are doomed in 2023. Therefore, please re-consider...

Anyone else brave enough to watch the video and discuss?

Incidentally, all Muslims I've spoken to are ready to die any time so be it: if their land becomes poisoned then they stay in their land. Therefore, only they have a valid reason for not watching the video IMO.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I made the video - not to preach - but with the intention of recruiting members as part of a team to survive for the 22 years that the weather machine will be operated for prior to official declaration of the New World Order. The elite are aiming for complete human extinction in the West - but since we have 3 years to prepare then we can get through those 22 years if we have enough supply of food and oxygen? We would then become famous later on in life and get interviewed by representatives from the East as being the only survivors of the West. We can then tell them the story of how everyone was applauding for the NHS at 8pm and celebrating with rainbows - not knowing that they were really clapping for the opening of the firmament to let in additional water to flood the Earth, i.e. for their own self-sacrifice.

Thanks for convincing me that my decision to ignore your video was a good one. You should tell your family doctor about the thoughts you've been having, and keep an open mind if this results in a script for haldoperidol.

Good luck with the whole deal.
 

Back
Top Bottom