It will. If enough people vote for no one, and large portion of those people are younger people, the major parties will adopt more of the views of them. Granted, this effect isn't as strong as if one votes for a third part who has a clear platform, even if you don't want him or her to win. This has traditionally been the role of third parties in the American system.
I know you want to believe that the current system leaves you no options but to radically change it, but it actually does give options. Just because you think it doesn't matter doesn't make it so.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding but it seems like you regard me as some politically ignorant kid. In the past I have been very involved with politics. I've helped campaign for candidates. I've been part of student political orgs. I've argued the same thing you are telling me now to other people.
You should take a look at previous presidential and congressional elections over the last 50 years or so. Aside from this last presidential election, if memory serves, you'd be lucky to get 50% voter turnout. Which means that in most elections over half the population shows either apathy about politics or a lack of confidence in our system. And if people truely thought their vote could change anything I doubt half of the voting population would not vote.
Then why don't you bring a big sign to a protest that says "I HAVE NOTHING TO SAY!"
I don't get the mentality. You want change, so you vote for no one, which has a 0% chance of change, rather than voting for a third party which has a greater percent chance, albeit small. You have basically rejected voting. So what are you for? Violent resistance?
You'll have to explain to me how believing that voting accomplishes nothing is equivilent to "I have nothing to say".
I have voted third party. In fact in the last election I did vote third party. Our campaign laws and restrictions essentially prevent any third party from being able to stand a chance in most elections. I believe there were a couple instances of a third party being elected, but a few in the last several thousand elections doesn't amount to much. Especially since those couple people have no real voting power compared to the number of dems and reps.
Recent political history shows that
-third party candidates don't stand a chance, and if they do the dems/reps establish new laws or rules to make it harder for them to win (ross perot debate anyone?)
-there is a massive lack of confidence in our government and the elections shown by lack of voting.
-candidates repeatedly lie and break campaign promises. It's amazing how many things a candidate will say they support that never seem to make it to the agenda once elected.
These last 300 bites of dirt weren't very good, maybe the next one will be better.