Stubblebine Speaks...

[Stellafane]

Yeah, Bill, you just wore out our fists with your chin.

SOP for truthers. They're like a bunch of blindfolded naked guys running around in a field full of cattle prods, telling themselves "Hey! That last zap might have been just a bit less painful! We're winning!!" It ain't much, but when it's all you got, I guess it's enough.

 

[triforcharity]

Bill,

Can you please explain to us how fast the plane in your photo was traveling when it collided with the building?? Can you?? I bet you can't.

Anyway, here is what I really would like to point out.

Now, if you take a sledgehammer, and slam it into a brick (Not block, there is a difference) wall, how many bricks are going to fall out?? One, nah, most likely 3-4, maybe even more. Maby less, but most certainly more than one.

Now, take an aircraft engine, blast it into a building at 500 +/- MPH. How many bricks is it going to break out of a wall?? I think that plane engine that made that hole was most likely NOT going 500 MPH at that point. It might have HIT the wall, but not penetrated it completely. I don't know for certain, but that is my thoughts. Plus, once that daamage is done, more bricks are going to fall because they have lost support. Not to mention, I don't know exactly when that picture was taken, but I can be pretty certain it wasn't the minute after it happened. Reason?? Spray Paint on the wall. They didn't start investigating untill the next day. So, because it is a safety hazard to be working around bricks that are loose, did you stop and think, maybe they (FBI, CIA, DOD, etc) might have removed some loose ones to ensure safety?? I bet they would. DOD is very strict on safety.

 

[bill smith]

ah so youre just a lying (rule 10) who thinks the events of 911 are a laugh riot

hopefully that series is getting canceled soon lol

Not a chance. A docusoap like this will run and run. Until it's finally over of course. Then we victorious heroic Truth seekers will be able to eat out on it all the rest of our lives.

 

[Justin39640]

Not a chance. A docusoap like this will run and run. Until it's over of course. Then we victorious heroic Truth seekers will be able to eat out on it all the rest of our lives.

o stop it
youre a lying troll
you dont even believe that BS
why are you here?
be honest
you couldnt even leave when you said you were goin

go ta bed already

 

[bill smith]

There were not six steerl reinforced walls sweetfoot. The only wall that was truely reinforced was the exterrior wall.
Also, can you please cite your source for this idiotic information??

Also, the fuselage did not make the hole in any of the rings, other than the outer ring. After that, it was the landing gear and the engines.

You posting a picture of a plane that crashed into a building doesn't prove anything. The only thing it proves is that the jet you posted was NOT going in excess of 500 MPH.

BTW, can anyone identify where this happened, or what type of airliner that is?? Its looks somewhat smaller than a 767, but I could be wrong.

Thanks!

Do you think the landing gear made the initial 16' hole ?

 

[BasqueArch]

I could be wrong, but I get the impression that Bill is not an angry, empty-headed kid, but a really sick old guy.

So, the question remains, why do you enjoy being beaten to a pulp and humiliated? You're never right. You always lose. Your lies always get exposed. How does your insane movement profit from your constant failures?

Sorry folks. Looks like the show's over for now. Tune in again for another episode of 'debunker tail-twisting' produced and directed by bill smith.

My pgggofesionel eepinion iss angry inch yurins for nogghhty beedee esem masokeestic frissson.

 

[Magenta]

Guys, you'd have a better chance of a rational discussion with the family pet than with BS...

BTW, can anyone identify where this happened, or what type of airliner that is?? Its looks somewhat smaller than a 767, but I could be wrong.

Thanks!

It's an MD-80 at Newark International Airport on 14 June 2000, according to this website.

 

[bill smith]

Guys, you'd have a better chance of a rational discussion with the family pet than with BS...




It's an MD-80 at Newark International Airport on 14 June 2000, according to this website.

None of the images there appear to show the damage this plane in the attached image incurred, Perhaps it was not the same incident ?
http://nomoregames.net/presentations/Madison_No_Planes_Final_August_07.ppt_files/slide0045_image034

 

[leftysergeant]

I stuck the response to the floor plan for the Pentagon in the wrong thread, but I will repeat it here. Stubby picked up a pile of dung dropped by a disgraced French Army officer named Pierre-Henri Bunel and ran with it. Bunel was dishonorably discharged from the French Army and has a grudge against Americans for screwing up his military career, even though it was clearly his own fault. His defense was based on a "the dog ate my homework" move. Boy ain't got his headbolts torqued right, I would say.

Bunel called himself an artillery officer and an expert in airfield fire fighting operations and then made statements proving that he was lying about that, too.

He was an intel officer.

Stubby should have known better.

That he would not have copme out to criticize and drive Bunel from the public forum, to me, is just further evidence of his lack of moral character, thus of credibility.

 

[bill smith]

I stuck the response to the floor plan for the Pentagon in the wrong thread, but I will repeat it here. Stubby picked up a pile of dung dropped by a disgraced French Army officer named Pierre-Henri Bunel and ran with it. Bunel was dishonorably discharged from the French Army and has a grudge against Americans for screwing up his military career, even though it was clearly his own fault. His defense was based on a "the dog ate my homework" move. Boy ain't got his headbolts torqued right, I would say.

Bunel called himself an artillery officer and an expert in airfield fire fighting operations and then made statements proving that he was lying about that, too.

He was an intel officer.

Stubby should have known better.

That he would not have copme out to criticize and drive Bunel from the public forum, to me, is just further evidence of his lack of moral character, thus of credibility.

Jeez....that Brunel guy sure gets around. Most frequently to the advantage of he oficial story if the truth be told. lol

'' Shortly before his untimely death, former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook told the House of Commons that “Al Qaeda” is not really a terrorist group but a database of international mujaheddin and arms smugglers used by the CIA and Saudis to funnel guerrillas, arms, and money into Soviet-occupied Afghanistan. Courtesy of World Affairs, a journal based in New Delhi, WMR can bring you an important excerpt from an Apr.-Jun. 2004 article by Pierre-Henry Bunel, a former agent for French military intelligence.''
http://thetruthorthefight.wordpress.com/2009/02/25/robin-cook/

 

[tsig]

I'd say our unseen audience is enjoying this little show Justin. Not as much as I am though.lol

Seeing people that are not there is not a good sign Bill.

 

[triforcharity]

Do you think the landing gear made the initial 16' hole ?

Which one, the ones in the exterrior of the building, or in towards the interrior of the building??

If the exterrior, than no, I dont think so.

Interrior-possibly. I am not an expert, and I will be the first to admit it but I do know a thing or two about plane crashes and the proper emergency response in reguards to ARFF and Rescue operations.

The landing gear of a plane have to be able to withstand TREMENDOUS forces. Wether it be knetic, or whatever, I don't claim to know the proper term. But, I do know that landing gear HAS GOT to be able to withstand amazing forces during a landing. Could they punch out a hole in a wall? Sure, why couldn't they?? They hold up a plane when it lands, so why couldn't it severely damage a wall?? They aren't toasters, thats for sure.

 

[triforcharity]

Bill, so its NOT an MD-80 thata crashed in your photo?? Can you please cite what this crash was??? I looked at the site, and it sure looks exactly like the one you posted, even the same exact airline. Coincidence?? I think not.

Now, if you look at the pictures at that site, you caan see that the skin of the airplane is not torn all to heck as you might believe.

http://www.avweb.com/newspics/newgate_04.jpg

This picture gives us alot of info to look at. Look at the left side of this picture. Near the top of the pilots windows, notice it doesn't appear to be torn?? This shows that the exterrior, especially the front leading edge, is not that torn. Sure, it looks like my M-I-L got angry and took a sledgehammer to it. But, it doesn't appear to be torn. Maybe this is because it wasn't traveling at 500 MPH??

 

[FineWine]

Not a chance. A docusoap like this will run and run. Until it's finally over of course. Then we victorious heroic Truth seekers will be able to eat out on it all the rest of our lives.

What is heroic about telling really stupid lies?

 

[FineWine]

Jeez....that Brunel guy sure gets around. Most frequently to the advantage of he oficial story if the truth be told. lol

'' Shortly before his untimely death, former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook told the House of Commons that “Al Qaeda” is not really a terrorist group but a database of international mujaheddin and arms smugglers used by the CIA and Saudis to funnel guerrillas, arms, and money into Soviet-occupied Afghanistan. Courtesy of World Affairs, a journal based in New Delhi, WMR can bring you an important excerpt from an Apr.-Jun. 2004 article by Pierre-Henry Bunel, a former agent for French military intelligence.''
http://thetruthorthefight.wordpress.com/2009/02/25/robin-cook/

Wow! Robin Cook! I guess that settles everything.

So a far-left loon who advocated unilateral nuclear disarmament by the West in the face of the massive Soviet buildup makes up stupid lies about al Qaeda. And a "truther" Useful Idiot laps it up. What else is new?

 

[JoeyDonuts]

Wait...WMR? As in the Wayne Madsen Report?

Wow, your credibility just shot through the roof.

 

[Audible Click]

<snip>Sorry folks. Looks like the show's over for now. Tune in again for another episode of 'debunker tail-twisting' produced and directed by bill smith. <snip>

In your dreams.

 

[beachnut]

You know one of the things I best like about that video ? It's subtitled in German. 90 million of them and they sure do know how to respect a senior military gentleman like Major-General Albert Stubbelbine.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daNr_TrBw6E

Stubbelbine has idiotic moronic ideas on 911. Stubbelbine apologized for McVeigh and for 19 terrorists; he failed on OKC and 911. Looks like Stubbelbine apologized for terrorist due to complete ignorance on the topic at hand. Stubbelbine can't understand 911; delusions based on failed opinions.

You repeated a lie about Robin Cook again; why do you post lies after you already learned they were lies?

 

[bill smith]

Which one, the ones in the exterrior of the building, or in towards the interrior of the building??

If the exterrior, than no, I dont think so.

Interrior-possibly. I am not an expert, and I will be the first to admit it but I do know a thing or two about plane crashes and the proper emergency response in reguards to ARFF and Rescue operations.

The landing gear of a plane have to be able to withstand TREMENDOUS forces. Wether it be knetic, or whatever, I don't claim to know the proper term. But, I do know that landing gear HAS GOT to be able to withstand amazing forces during a landing. Could they punch out a hole in a wall? Sure, why couldn't they?? They hold up a plane when it lands, so why couldn't it severely damage a wall?? They aren't toasters, thats for sure.

So did the eggshell nose of he plane make the initial 16' hole in the reinforced concrete exterior wall then if the landing gear did not ?

 

[Cuddles]

Please keep it civil and do not engage in petty bickering. Remember, attack the argument, not the arguer.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Cuddles