• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Structural Engineer Kamal Obeid compares WTC 7 to a beer can

Uh-oh, Kamal's nose is under the Tent of TruthTM, surely the massive conspiracy is about to be blown wide open!
 
achimspok said:
FALSE AND INCORRECT

Proven a long time ago. Try the search function in this very forum.

Mackey is wrong. Penthouse collapse doesn't mean == core is gone. It's just a bit like that.

Proven: The east penthouse

<blah blah balh ************ babbling snipped>


and nun babble or insults because it may take months until I will visit for the next time. Well, you said I should go and have a life instead of reading 9 years of failure - and I did it. It's real fun. You should try it too.:cool:
Click to expand...


Hey, I only have ONE simple question for you.

When are you going to publish your paper in a respectable journal showing NIST wrong?
 
triforcharity said:
Hey, I only have ONE simple question for you.

When are you going to publish your paper in a respectable journal showing NIST wrong?
Click to expand...

He really should publish a "truther" article on the collapses....

The title could be something like "Pizza and beer....modeling the collapses"

All the truthers need to do is buy some pizza and beer....they can eat the pizza and drink the beer and then use the pizza boxes to model the collapses of WTC 1 and 2 and use the beer cans to model the collapse of WTC 7.

Someone should have explained this to NIST a long time ago....all they needs was some beer and pizza and they could have saved millions on the report....plus they wouldn't have been hungry or thisty while writing it.
 
Never mind beer cans. We already have the pyramid of fine glass champagne flutes.

This would be on about the same level as the WTC-as-"avalanche" arguments and how exact chocolate replicas of the Towers could demonstrate top-down collapse... :D

Let us be thankful that no one here on JREF has the capacity to go anywhere near real designs of any buildings that real human beings might use.
 
Well, except for the licensed architects and engineers and rocket scientists we have here. But yeah, other than that.....
 
achimspok said:
FALSE AND INCORRECT

Proven a long time ago. Try the search function in this very forum.

... PSS. No need for some beachnut ...:cool:
Click to expand...
Proved on 911, no CD. Try the rational logic form of thinking.
... after 9 years of failure you threaten not to come back for months (please throw me in that brier-patch). Please no, not months, make it years, 100 or more. No need to come back achimspok, your failure will not improve with time. You failed to prove your delusion of CD. Indeed, you prove CD is nonsense based on moronic opinions and idiotic lies. Prove otherwise, publish in a real journal and learn you have delusions and nonsense; oops, you can't prove anything to support your CD delusion in a real journal; better publish with Jones, or Fetzer. Feel free to make it years before you post more nonsense which fails to support your CD delusion. You insult yourself with failed delusions of CD.

Chomsky - spell check for achimspok, a CT?

Is your model, proved model, or whatever you have, a beer can too? What Engineering Journal is your information in? Do you have a clue what NIST's goals were? What does WTC7 have to do with 19 terrorists doing 911? Fire melted the beer can... great model. Why do the terrorists take credit for 911? 911 truth, not as smart as a terrorist; new show?

Publish? Time? Why is Heiwa the only truther brave enough to publish his letter, his critique in a real journal? Don't you believe in your nonsense and delusions as Heiwa believed in his? Hurry back, I fixed espresso ...
 
Last edited:
A W Smith said:
Last edited by achimspok;
Did you edit out all the citations to your "proven" claims? Because all im seeing is a list of unsupported bald assertions.


???? You don't speak English, do you?
Click to expand...

1) Use the search function!
2) Stay up to date!
3) Prevent discussing the same nonsense over and over again.

Do you speak german? Our conversation would be much easier. I think you don't, Mr. Smith, do you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom