• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Strange object on Mars

Keziah Mason said:

I would also like to see any proof you have of your claim of two separate data streams from the spacecraft (sorry, I missed this earlier or I would have jumped on it) or the existance of any sort of 'shadow cabinet'. I can state that no such things exist and the raw images you see are indeed the raw images. Of course, I now expect to be called part of the conspiracy :rolleyes:

More like unwitting lackey. :i:
 
Bottle or the Gun, I ask you again: do you have any proof of your claims? Otherwise, I see no reason to take your "shadow cabinet" talk seriously.
 
Soapy Sam said:

When you find spiky things in the sand in terrestrial deserts, they are usually trace fossils of some sort.

I don't think the picture is clear enough to determine if this is a spiky thing resting on top of the ground or a non-spiky thing with sand covering to make it look spiky.
 
I think the bunny picture is more significant. I've had pet rabbits, and if they're anything to go by, I know why certain of the landers have failed.

NASA needs to bunny-proof their wiring. The critters have obviously been just munching it up.
 
Re: Re: Strange object on Mars

Yahweh said:

Your link is broken...

In the mean time, how long do you think it will be before this turns into an alien skull:
Looks like a frog to me.
 
Keziah Mason said:


What does the "It" refer to?

Are you being a woo-woo, a sarcastic rendition of a woo-woo, or just a troll?

You are not supposed to take the 'shadow cabinet' seriously. There are no conspirancies, no aliens, only a huge beauracracy where left-hand and right-hand don't know what the other is doing. MAYBE my SARCASM wasn't CLEAR ENOUGH for you.

PS: 'Troll'? I thought that was what you were doing.
 
Bottle or the Gun said:


You are not supposed to take the 'shadow cabinet' seriously. There are no conspirancies, no aliens, only a huge beauracracy where left-hand and right-hand don't know what the other is doing. MAYBE my SARCASM wasn't CLEAR ENOUGH for you.


Yeah, that's right, get mad when someone doesn't get your sarcasm.

There are plenty of people who make statements just like yours and believe them. It just confuses the issue if you carry on your "sarcasm" far too long or don't include a wink or smile in your post.

But congratulations - I had you completely confused with a Hoagland fanatic. I'll not make the mistake of taking anything you say seriously after this.


PS: 'Troll'? I thought that was what you were doing.

Riiiight....the skeptical view is the troll :rolleyes:
 
Thanks! :wink:

Gotta say though, if there is proof of aliens, I'm first in line to buy the Discovery channel DVD and toys! I can't think of anything better to happen to humanity except for world peace.
 
Uh oh...

Looks like mama's back fer her yung'en
mamcrab.jpg


By the way, if it looks like a rock, fails to move like a rock and other rocks are all over the place, then its probably a rock. It does have the same average ccolor as the flat textured bedrock further up the slope.
 
Mine eyes...

...see a semi-semetrical antenna loooking structure, of a different color, texture, and shape as the other formations.

But my perception is clouded by the possibility that life might exist in a form or shape I would recogonize as such.

It looks like somthing, rather than nothing, to me.
 
Re: Mine eyes...

King of the Americas said:
...see a semi-semetrical antenna loooking structure, of a different color, texture, and shape as the other formations.

But my perception is clouded by the possibility that life might exist in a form or shape I would recogonize as such.

It looks like somthing, rather than nothing, to me.
A rock is nothing? And its the same color.
 
c0rbin said:
It puts the lotion on and then it puts it in the basket.



Allright?but I just don't see the connection between this object on Mars & 'Silence of the Lambs'?
 
Re: To KnightGI:

King of the Americas said:

So. I'm not impressed with a couple of guys using the Photoshop eyedropper tool on a JPEG and calling that conclusive. This is the Carlos/Latin method of image analysis. If you can find a better image analysis of that rock, then by all means please do so. I am telling you that there is no difference in the average color of that still unmoving rock and the bed rock upslope.
 
I think it is a skull rock eating bunny....anyone that cannot see that is obviously weak minded...
 

Back
Top Bottom