Stormy Daniels sues the President Part II

[The Big Dog]

This is a continuation of the previous thread. Participants are free to quote from the previous thread.

Posted By: Agatha

1,442,420 > 1,135,000

One may wish to review the timing of the deposits and withdrawals...

 

[The Don]

Yes, I think The Big Dog misinterpreted Elliott Broidy's payment

 

[LSSBB]

I can ask them if you want, but I am pretty sure they are going to say that it is unethical to use documents that were stolen from a third party.

Presumes they were stolen.

 

[The Big Dog]

Maybe TBD has an accountant buddy too.

Nope, just a calendar.

 

[LSSBB]

One may wish to review the timing of the deposits and withdrawals...

Are you saying it's a cash flow issue?

 

[The Big Dog]

Are you saying it's a cash flow issue?

I have explained that the information released by Stormy's lawyer is obviously incomplete as simple analysis of the deposits and withdrawals can easily confirm.

I mean that it is obvious, the chart shows withdrawals through September 2017 that SUBSTANTIALLY exceed the deposits as of September

 

[LSSBB]

I have explained that the information released by Stormy's lawyer is obviously incomplete as simple analysis of the deposits and withdrawals can easily confirm.

What information is missing, a running account balance with opening and ending balances?
You could just say "I don't know what cash flow means", also.

 

[The Big Dog]

What information is missing, a running account balance with opening and ending balances?
You could just say "I don't know what cash flow means", also.

I literally just explained "the chart shows withdrawals through September 2017 that SUBSTANTIALLY exceed the deposits as of September."

Clearly there is information missing, this is obvious.

 

[TheL8Elvis]

We also know that he did not issue a subpoena, rather it seems clear that he got them as the result of an improper leak, which he refuses to disclose based on 'work product' which I am sure the thread lawyers will shortly tell us is not how authenticity works.

I can ask them if you want, but I am pretty sure they are going to say that it is unethical to use documents that were stolen from a third party.

You forgot to provide ANY EVIDENCE for these claims.

 

[LSSBB]

I literally just explained "the chart shows withdrawals through September 2017 that SUBSTANTIALLY exceed the deposits as of September."

Clearly there is information missing, this is obvious.

The account balance, then? Did they take it down too far? Why does it matter to the analysis?

 

[The Big Dog]

The account balance, then? Did they take it down too far? Why does it matter to the analysis?

They took it down well below negative according to the chart .... which shows that the information is incomplete.

 

[Hellbound]

They took it down well below negative according to the chart .... which shows that the information is incomplete.

Can you show your math? Because I don't see that.

From the list, there was $1,242,420 in the account at the time of Cohen's 1,005,000 withdrawal.

You do realize, I hope, that the arrows on the chart show whether money was put in or out, and it's source and destination? Broidy added $62,500 to the account....the rest of the expenditures on there are from him to Keith Davidson via REAG.

ETA: Actually, a correction: should have been $1,112,420 when Cohen withdrew his cash (according to the chart). I forgot to take out the $130k for Stormy.

 

[Fast Eddie B]

What we're looking at is cash flow for a given period.

I think some are expecting it to "balance". That's a mistaken assumption.

To which someone could just reply, "Ah, yes. I stand corrected".

I won't hold my breath.

 

[LSSBB]

They took it down well below negative according to the chart .... which shows that the information is incomplete.

Depends on what the balance before and after the timeline is. Why do you think it even matters? Do you think the information they show is all they have? Once again, you are somehow thinking the cash flow balance is important for some reason.

 

[ponderingturtle]

It is kind of shocking with all the money laundering Trump has been involved in over the years that he and his employees are not better at it.

 

[Random]

They took it down well below negative according to the chart .... which shows that the information is incomplete.

The chart is definitely incomplete. MSNBC is saying at least $4 million went though the LLC...

 

[The Big Dog]

The chart is definitely incomplete. MSNBC is saying at least $4 million went though the LLC...

Yes, thank you, that is what I have been trying to explain.

 

[LSSBB]

Yes, thank you, that is what I have been trying to explain.

No, you were focused on a single month, September 2017.

 

[The Big Dog]

I literally just explained "the chart shows withdrawals through September 2017 that SUBSTANTIALLY exceed the deposits as of September."

Clearly there is information missing, this is obvious.

No, you were focused on a single month, September 2017.

False.

 

[LSSBB]

False.

And you did not say WHY September flows were important. If the rest of the income occurred before the timeline, outflows in September are not important. If you start with a million, taking out a few hundred thousand as of September is unimportant. It's the end to end inflows and outflows.

ETA: I feel like I am debating a climate change denialist, picking two points most favorable to their argument on the global temperature timeline.