Stormfront Supports Ron Paul

But that is not what Dr A posted....

Well then please explain to me what he was trying to imply.
Maybe i just interpreted it wrong, but im almost positive he was trying to say something along the lines of Ron Paul being crazy because a group of racists and twoofers endorsed him.
 
Well then please explain to me what he was trying to imply.
Maybe i just interpreted it wrong, but im almost positive he was trying to say something along the lines of Ron Paul being crazy because a group of racists and twoofers endorsed him.


You're not an American citizen, are you? Some people and
the Media in this country use this tactic all the time to discredit
an opponent ... But this time they will fail ... :)
 
Well then please explain to me what he was trying to imply.
Maybe i just interpreted it wrong, but im almost positive he was trying to say something along the lines of Ron Paul being crazy because a group of racists and twoofers endorsed him.


He didn't imply anything - he clearly stated that the only good thing about Ron Paul is that he is not Badnarik. It's called "damning with faint praise".

He also made another comment responding to your question about what did it mean to say that Ron Paul is supported by nutters - to which he again clearly answered - "it means they are nuts".
 
Last edited:
He didn't imply anything - he clearly stated that the only good thing about Ron Paul is that he is not Badnarik. It's called "damning with faint praise".

He also made another comment responding to your question about what did it mean to say that Ron Paul is supported by nutters - to which he again clearly answered - "it means they are nuts".

Well wouldnt that then mean he stupidly pointed out the obvious?
For if i stated that "nuts" people are supporting Ron Paul I already acknowledge the fact they are nuts for i said the word first.
For me to acknowledge people as nut and then for him to restate what i have already said is kind of dumb especially in a rebuttal/response to my post.

He then goes on to ask me if i need a picture painted, but I obviously do not because i know what was intended by his comments. For i refuse to believe that he respond to me stating they are "nutters" with the obvious statement of "it means they are nuts".:boggled:

I think you are playing devils advocate my friend.
 
Well wouldnt that then mean he stupidly pointed out the obvious?
For if i stated that "nuts" people are supporting Ron Paul I already acknowledge the fact they are nuts for i said the word first.
For me to acknowledge people as nut and then for him to restate what i have already said is kind of dumb especially in a rebuttal/response to my post.


He then goes on to ask me if i need a picture painted, but I obviously do not because i know what was intended by his comments. For i refuse to believe that he respond to me stating they are "nutters" with the obvious statement of "it means they are nuts".:boggled:

I think you are playing devils advocate my friend.

I'm not - but I've learnt over the years that sometimes people look for more than what the actual posts said - Dr A's posts to me were very clear and straightforward whilst you seem to be trying to imply he was in fact saying something quite different to what his text says.
 
I'm not - but I've learnt over the years that sometimes people look for more than what the actual posts said - Dr A's posts to me were very clear and straightforward whilst you seem to be trying to imply he was in fact saying something quite different to what his text says.

Well im sorry to tell yo0u this then, but if his post were infact supposed to be taken for face avlue like you are claiming then they were pointless and dumb!

The first part of his post he quoted me and then restated something i already said by saying....
"Well, it's meant to mean that they're nuts."
I already said they were nuts soo no need to quote me or respond with the obvious.

The second part of his post makes no sense if looked at you way because he states....
"Should I draw you a picture, or what?"
Why would he need to draw such a picture if his comments were meant at face value. The second part of his post was definitely not required.

The third part of his post i could careless about but was also a shot taken at Dr. Ron Paul....
"The best you can say for the man is that he's not Badnarik."

So i must say that if taken the way you say his post should have been taken it is pointless and without meaning! He might have well just quoted me and wrote nothing in as his own block of text because all he really did was repeat me with the addition of the slick shot a Ron Paul.

I do not look for more then the post says as you have stated above. I merely was assuming intelligence was behind the post rather then it didnt mean absolutely anything at all, and was just put there so he could just add text to the convo.
 
I didn't say that, did I?

I didn't imply that did, I?

Nothing I've posted suggests that in any way, does it?

Are you off your head?

Im sorry i was mistaken then. You actually were just adding text to the conversation and had no point intended at all. Im not use to seeing meaningless posts around here so i figured your was not.

Sorry, and i will gracefully backout of this argument!
 
Why do these racists support Ron Paul?

White Nationalists will be supporting Ron Paul next year because they know Paul will not follow a Jewish agenda like every presidency has since FDR.
 
Curiosity:

From the Nazi/White Supremacist/whatever you're calling yourself today perspective, what makes you think Ron Paul's your man?
 
How do you know if they vote or don't? Respectfully, I'd like an American to answer that.

I was just wondering if these people started to vote if it would make any difference?

I am an American and a White Nationalist and have voted in every Presidential election since 1972. I have always voted third party or for an independent. I never vote for the Jew Party System: Republicans and Democrats. In 1972 I voted for John Schmitz on the American Independent Party.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_G._Schmitz
 
Curiosity:

From the Nazi/White Supremacist/whatever you're calling yourself today perspective, what makes you think Ron Paul's your man?

Paul would end the war in Iraq and keep peace with Iran.

Support for Israel (hopefully) will end.

You have to always ask the question. "Is it good for the Jews?"
 
MaGZ; said:
I am an American and a White Nationalist and have voted in every Presidential election since 1972. I have always voted third party or for an independent. I never vote for the Jew Party System: Republicans and Democrats. In 1972 I voted for John Schmitz on the American Independent Party.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_G._Schmitz

Thanks. As a non-white American, I encourage you to continue wasting your political capital by voting for whack-job fringe candidates. Please continue marginalizing yourself.
 
Hey ImaginalDisc,

Unless I missed it (I'm a busy man) you never answered my question about whether you're going to report on the fringe groups that support the other candidates, or if you just wanted to cherry pick this to smear Ron Paul.
 
The free market should decide what is clean and safe, not the government.
You've gotta be kidding. If NO business is forced to adhere to cleanliness standards, none of them will bother. That's why the laws were set in the first place. Same thing with labour and employment laws. Or maybe one will, allegedly out of the goodness of their hearts... and charge outrageous prices, while the majority of the folks will have to be content with the rest of the crap.

Evidence that food inspection has made food safer?
Are you serious? :boggled: Perhaps we should just ignore the recall warnings...
 
That there are racist nuts supporting Ron Paul does not imply that Ron Paul or his supporters are racist nuts.

However, it does make me ask the question, what are they hoping to get from Ron Paul?
 

Back
Top Bottom