Oh so Ron Pauls ideas must be crazy because a group of crazy racists endorsed him. I like that philosophy, and it sounds so scientifically sound might i add!
But that is not what Dr A posted....
Oh so Ron Pauls ideas must be crazy because a group of crazy racists endorsed him. I like that philosophy, and it sounds so scientifically sound might i add!
But that is not what Dr A posted....
Well then please explain to me what he was trying to imply.
Maybe i just interpreted it wrong, but im almost positive he was trying to say something along the lines of Ron Paul being crazy because a group of racists and twoofers endorsed him.
Well then please explain to me what he was trying to imply.
Maybe i just interpreted it wrong, but im almost positive he was trying to say something along the lines of Ron Paul being crazy because a group of racists and twoofers endorsed him.
He didn't imply anything - he clearly stated that the only good thing about Ron Paul is that he is not Badnarik. It's called "damning with faint praise".
He also made another comment responding to your question about what did it mean to say that Ron Paul is supported by nutters - to which he again clearly answered - "it means they are nuts".

Well wouldnt that then mean he stupidly pointed out the obvious?
For if i stated that "nuts" people are supporting Ron Paul I already acknowledge the fact they are nuts for i said the word first.
For me to acknowledge people as nut and then for him to restate what i have already said is kind of dumb especially in a rebuttal/response to my post.
He then goes on to ask me if i need a picture painted, but I obviously do not because i know what was intended by his comments. For i refuse to believe that he respond to me stating they are "nutters" with the obvious statement of "it means they are nuts".
I think you are playing devils advocate my friend.
I didn't say that, did I?Oh so Ron Pauls ideas must be crazy because a group of crazy racists endorsed him.
I'm not - but I've learnt over the years that sometimes people look for more than what the actual posts said - Dr A's posts to me were very clear and straightforward whilst you seem to be trying to imply he was in fact saying something quite different to what his text says.
I didn't say that, did I?
I didn't imply that did, I?
Nothing I've posted suggests that in any way, does it?
Are you off your head?
Right.Im sorry i was mistaken then.
Wrong.You actually were just adding text to the conversation and had no point intended at all.
Right.Im not use to seeing meaningless posts around here so i figured your was not.
Sensible.Sorry, and i will gracefully backout of this argument!
Why do these racists support Ron Paul?
How do you know if they vote or don't? Respectfully, I'd like an American to answer that.
I was just wondering if these people started to vote if it would make any difference?
Curiosity:
From the Nazi/White Supremacist/whatever you're calling yourself today perspective, what makes you think Ron Paul's your man?
So, you've got nothing?
That's as I expected.
MaGZ; said:I am an American and a White Nationalist and have voted in every Presidential election since 1972. I have always voted third party or for an independent. I never vote for the Jew Party System: Republicans and Democrats. In 1972 I voted for John Schmitz on the American Independent Party.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_G._Schmitz
You've gotta be kidding. If NO business is forced to adhere to cleanliness standards, none of them will bother. That's why the laws were set in the first place. Same thing with labour and employment laws. Or maybe one will, allegedly out of the goodness of their hearts... and charge outrageous prices, while the majority of the folks will have to be content with the rest of the crap.The free market should decide what is clean and safe, not the government.
Are you serious?Evidence that food inspection has made food safer?
Perhaps we should just ignore the recall warnings...The best you can say for the man is that he's not Badnarik.