Sylvia obviously has alot of fans, thats why she sells so much etc..So it stands to reason a lot of people would have "success" stories from her readings. Its the nature of the beast, if someone has been doing it this long, alot of people will believe in her.
StopSylvia email: "Hummmmmm"
- Thread starter RSLancastr
- Start date
-
- Tags
- stop sylvia browne
Sylvia obviously has alot of fans, thats why she sells so much etc..So it stands to reason a lot of people would have "success" stories from her readings. Its the nature of the beast, if someone has been doing it this long, alot of people will believe in her.
Joey McGee
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2011
- Messages
- 10,307
Where is the evidence of her powers? That she is actually talking to the dead? That she has actually found a missing person? That she can read people's life problems? This evidence does not exist! So you have no argument! You're way out of your league Mack.
Joey McGee
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2011
- Messages
- 10,307
Her career is nothing but a veiled attempt to cash in on her manipulative and soulless nature disguised as a philanthropic venture.
I don't believe she can do those things either, but you again are missing my point. If anonymous emails are enough to publish as further evidence she is a fraud, then post the numerous written articles as proof that she is psychic. Either that or admit your site is a hate site.
I'd agree! However, 2 wrongs don't make a right and its not exactly the issue is it?
Joey McGee
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2011
- Messages
- 10,307
That does not make sense. Plus, you admit that you don't know how RSL verifies his victim stories are real.
RSL obviously cares very much about people, he thinks she is a fraud and he set the site up to help deluded people. That is what the facts of the matter say the site is. I am disgusted by your repeated attacks on him. You might as well go into a police station and call everyone a pig just because you saw brutality on the news.
He's being fair, you're making a wildly desperate argument based on something you don't even know, how he confirms victim stories, shame?
Robert clearly has an agenda: to stop SB from taking advantage of more people at their most vulnerable moments. I think Robert's been very forthcoming about this fact.
(Pro tip: it's in the name of the website).
On her own site, and on probably dozens of fan sites, you can already find plenty of fawning, indiscriminate praise for SB--consisting solely of "success stories" (scare quotes very much needed).
Robert's site is meant to balance the mountain of misinformation and lies with some truth. Why would Robert want to post *more* success stories than what's already out there? Do you really feel that people have a hard time finding them?
Finally: a hate site? Hyperbolize much? Obviously you've never seen a hate site before--try stormfront.
And find somewhere else to troll.
(Pro tip: it's in the name of the website).
On her own site, and on probably dozens of fan sites, you can already find plenty of fawning, indiscriminate praise for SB--consisting solely of "success stories" (scare quotes very much needed).
Robert's site is meant to balance the mountain of misinformation and lies with some truth. Why would Robert want to post *more* success stories than what's already out there? Do you really feel that people have a hard time finding them?
Finally: a hate site? Hyperbolize much? Obviously you've never seen a hate site before--try stormfront.
And find somewhere else to troll.
Rasmus
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2005
- Messages
- 6,372
And this is evidence of what?
And, no, I don't think he is applying a double standard at all. The whole point is that the fans do not consider the actual evidence. He couldn't list any of these success stories in a way that wouldn't support his point.
Joey McGee
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2011
- Messages
- 10,307
The proven public failures and lack of success conclusively shows that she is a fraud. There are so many real cases of her publicly screwing people over, she told a couple their son was dead but he was still alive, but never apologized. She is a horrible person, a fraud. The fact that he publishes emails he gets from the public is just a bonus on top of all that. It's not what the site is based on. Without those emails it would still prove she is a heartless scam artist worthy of nothing but contempt.
Joey McGee
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2011
- Messages
- 10,307
Your point is that this is a hate site, that his emails are written by trolls, everyone knows this. You have no evidence for this, or even a reason to think it's a big deal. Everyone is starting to think you're the troll, since you seem to have nothing but this one lame criticism available.
Joey McGee
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2011
- Messages
- 10,307
You said it was a hate site and he should include positive stories from believers. You were given reasons why both ideas don't make sense. I'm sure Robert doesn't have CNN International team to vet his emails for him, are you cool with that?
No, i said if he claimed his site was balanced (which he did in a previous thread i started) he should do that. But my point was that its not, and you guys have agreed with me. The only difference is you think its fair enough that his site is biased, i dont. But i don't, but i respect your opinion.
Joey McGee
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2011
- Messages
- 10,307
the internet has One anti-Sylvia site, and many success stories all over the web dating back for years. The internet is now balanced thanks to StopSylvia.
I'm curious to see where he said his site was balanced. I'm willing to bet that if he *did* say "balanced", that there is a lot of context you're (willfully?) neglecting to recall.
Wrong. You said it was a "hate site". Now you claim you merely said his reporting of emails was biased.
Do you admit to hyperbolizing?
GrandMasterFox
Illuminator
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2009
- Messages
- 3,391
mushy , extrodinary claims require extrodinary evidence.
A claim that someone ate breakfast is not extrondinary and does not require evidence.
A claim that someone ate breakfast on mars is quite extrodinary and does require evidence.
A claim that Sylvia ripped someone off, is not extrodinary.
A claim that Sylvia actually performed a miracle is quite extrodinary and does require evidence.
There is no double standard here.
A claim that someone ate breakfast is not extrondinary and does not require evidence.
A claim that someone ate breakfast on mars is quite extrodinary and does require evidence.
A claim that Sylvia ripped someone off, is not extrodinary.
A claim that Sylvia actually performed a miracle is quite extrodinary and does require evidence.
There is no double standard here.