Steven Jones debates Leslie Robertson

[T.A.M.]

I highly endorse this debate. Steven Jones mopped the floor with Les Robertson. Please everyone listen to how silly and indefensible the official story is. Please listen to this.

Are we talking about the Seattle debate. You must be talking about another one. I listened to that debate a few days ago, and Jones did no such thing. Robertson stood his ground, and made a tonne of sense.

Your comments prove how delusional you truely are TS.

As for the sham mag the scholars call a "journal", the ultimate in hypocracy is to deny publication of an article in this journal for "academic ethics" violations, when the entire shammag itself is a violation of academic ethics. It's Peer Review committee on any given publication is selected in part by Jones himself, who is also a submitter of publications. There are numerous "conflict of interest" violations amongst the submissions that are published and the positions of those who publish them.

Is there a regulating body that keeps tabs and/or standards on what defines a "journal" and if so, how do I contact them?

TAM

 

[chipmunk stew]

Is there a regulating body that keeps tabs and/or standards on what defines a "journal" and if so, how do I contact them?

I don't think so. The credibility of a journal is based on its reputation among experts and academics in the field, as far as I know. I'm pretty sure it's a "free market", with the "product" being quality of research and academic standards and the "currency" being reputation.

 

[delphi_ote]

Are we talking about the Seattle debate. You must be talking about another one. I listened to that debate a few days ago, and Jones did no such thing. Robertson stood his ground, and made a tonne of sense.

Your comments prove how delusional you truely are TS.

As for the sham mag the scholars call a "journal", the ultimate in hypocracy is to deny publication of an article in this journal for "academic ethics" violations, when the entire shammag itself is a violation of academic ethics. It's Peer Review committee on any given publication is selected in part by Jones himself, who is also a submitter of publications. There are numerous "conflict of interest" violations amongst the submissions that are published and the positions of those who publish them.

Is there a regulating body that keeps tabs and/or standards on what defines a "journal" and if so, how do I contact them?

TAM

Technically, I suppose I am my own peer.

 

[Gravy]

Technically, I suppose I am my own peer.

I'm merely my own MP. Stop lording it over us.

 

[Foolmewunz]

No idea. He may not have known Jones' premise, or may have thought that a common sense approach would be sufficient.

I haven't had any contact with him. He seems to have been pretty busy designing tall buildings.

Sorry, mis-attributed - I had to go searching just now. It was Kent1!

 

[Gravy]

Sorry, mis-attributed - I had to go searching just now. It was Kent1!

Kent1 is always doing stuff like contacting people who were directly involved in the WTC's construction and investigations. By now you should know to avoid him.

 

[Foolmewunz]

Kent1 is always doing stuff like contacting people who were directly involved in the WTC's construction and investigations. By now you should know to avoid him.

I know... Pesky Researchers and Facts Getting in the Way of the Truth. The guy doesn't know when to quit!


Yeah, if we're going to keep up with Russell, we have to rely more on gut instincts, impressions, and "just doesn't seems".