• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Steve Pinker is a Blank Slater, he just hasn't realised it yet.

Steve Pinker says that children are 'shaped' by both genetics and experience - but that most of the shaping is caused by 'random' factors, and none is parental influence. You can argue about how much of the 'shaping' is 'random', but saying that parents have no influence is obviously wrong.
Well I agree that this is obviously wrong, but Robborama was earlier claiming that the data backs this claim up.

I haven't yet seen the data that is supposed to back this claim up.
 
I apologize for not supplying cites. I'm currently stuck behind the great firewall and can't get on google. Haven't been able to get my VPN working so there we go.

Over the next week or so I may try reading through that textbook I quoted to see if there's much in there related to the issue, but if you're interested one of the key words to look for is shared environment. The overall environment generally explains 50% or more of the variation in traits in these adoption and twin studies, but the shared environment (for instance among siblings in the same home) explains very little of the variation.

Here's what Behavioral Genetics has to say on the topic:

Shared Environment

Shared environmental influences refer to all nongenetic influences that make family members similar to one another. This can include a wide range of factors, includ- ing neighborhood, parental education, and family factors such as parenting behavior or the amount of conflict that occurs within the household. These factors will be shared environmental influences only if they result in greater similarity among indi- viduals living in the same household and if they do not vary as a function of genetic relatedness. In other words, if fraternal twins are as similar as identical twins, and this similarity is not negligible, then shared environmental influences are important. Similarly, if the similarity of “environmental” siblings is the same as that of “genetic” siblings, then shared environmental influences are indicated. The Appendix provides more detail about how shared environmental influences are estimated in twin, sibling, and combination designs.
There has been confusion about shared environmental influences. As will be de- scribed in Chapters 11 through 19, there is little evidence of shared environmental influences on many commonly studied behaviors such as personality and cognitive abilities; the modest shared environmental influences that have been found are often significant only during childhood and adolescence (Plomin, 2011; Plomin & Daniels, 1987). However, shared environmental influences do have some effect through child- hood and adolescence (Burt, 2009b), especially for certain types of behavior prob- lems, although they also become less important for explaining similarity for family members no longer living in the same household. In other words, residing in the same household does increase the similarity of family members, although these effects do not appear to persist once children have moved out of the home.

Plomin, R., & Daniels, D. (1987). Why are children in the same family so different from each other? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10, 1–16. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X00055941

Plomin, R. (2011). Commentary: Why are children in the same family so different? Non-shared environment three decades later. International Journal of Epidemiology, 40, 582–592. DOI: 10.1093/ije/ dyq144
 
Last edited:
Steve Pinker says that children are 'shaped' by both genetics and experience - but that most of the shaping is caused by 'random' factors, and none is parental influence. You can argue about how much of the 'shaping' is 'random', but saying that parents have no influence is obviously wrong. But what does he even mean by 'shaped'?

I don't read enough Pinker to know what he might mean, but he might mean gene-environment interaction in which the interaction may not be consistent among individuals. In this sense the shaping would be done by that difficult to observe interaction. And are there predictable results from different styles of parenting anyway? Might be a tad difficult to isolate.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom