• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Sterling has the last Laugh, Ballmer offers to buy Clippers for record $2B

wrs

Graduate Poster
Joined
Nov 2, 2013
Messages
1,901
When I heard the news on GMA this morning I had a good laugh. Why am I not surprised about this?

Why isn't there a thread on this? Isn't this really big news? Adam Silver punishes fellow jew Donald Sterling by throwing him out of the NBA and forcing him to sell the team and it's rumored that a black group might buy the team but now, the team is bought by, who woulda thunk it, another jew. Seems no one else is going to beat this bid, certainly not Magic or Oprah.

So what do we conclude about money, power and race from this? Did jews just show blacks who really has the power (and by extension, Donald Sterling is at least justified in his remarks about who pays whom) or is this just another interesting coincidence?

I have no axe to grind here, I just think this is really funny and I do mean haha funny.

So what do the skeptics conclude, nothing to see here, move along?
 
And his religion is important because......?

I think jewishness is more than religion, it is also blood and probably more imporant than that, it's community. I know that it's possible to convert to judaism but I also know that if the mother is jewish, the children are considered jewish by birth. So there is more to it than religion. This is how Steve Ballmer comes to be a jew. He is by birth from his mother. I don't know if he is a practicing jew or not. I do know that I found him in a list of the fifty wealthiest jews that was in the Jerusalem Post. Not sure what that has to do with religion either. I also know that he visits Israel and I am not sure if that is religious or not.

Don't forget, Donald Sterling said that when jews do well, they help their community. I am not sure Ballmer buying his team for top dollar is what he meant by that but it is certainly how it worked for Michael Dell when he was in trouble back in 1993. In 1994, he hired Mort Topfer from Motorola who turned the company back from the edge of destruction and away it went with the stock going insane the next 6 years. Oh yes, Mort Topfer is a Brooklyn born jew. In addition, in 1990 when the company was entering it's growth phase, Michael turned to Mort Meyerson another prominent and successful jewish businessman for help in the transition. The jewish community has rallied around Michael Dell and he has also given back to it. This isn't about religion I don't think.

None of this is particularly bad or evil, it's just the way it is and to pretend otherwise is to deny the facts.
 
So one Jew paid a boatload of money to another Jew. How is anyone who isn't one of those two Jews hurt by this? Shouldn't you be saving your outrage for when a boatload of non-Jewish money is paid to a Jew?

Steve S
 
So one Jew paid a boatload of money to another Jew. How is anyone who isn't one of those two Jews hurt by this? Shouldn't you be saving your outrage for when a boatload of non-Jewish money is paid to a Jew?

Steve S

What outrage? I think it's funny and I most definitely approve.
 
You are hearing voices in your head?

No, but I don't see what the point of emphasizing the possible future owner's religion and/or ethinicity with respect to the former owner's religion and/or ethnicity (or stigmatizing mental illness, for that matter) has to do with the over-all event here. Sterling was forced to divest himself of the Clippers because he was caught saying racist things, not because he was Jewish.
 
What is anti-jew about it? So you have no comment on the facts?

You mean that the religion/ethnicity of the former owner of the Clippers and the religion/ethnicity of the possible future owner of the Clippers is wholly irrelevant to the sale thereof?
 
You mean that the religion/ethnicity of the former owner of the Clippers and the religion/ethnicity of the possible future owner of the Clippers is wholly irrelevant to the sale thereof?

That would be the question I am raising based on the facts. As I said, what do skeptics think, does it bear upon the transaction or is it just a coincidence?
 
That would be the question I am raising based on the facts. As I said, what do skeptics think, does it bear upon the transaction or is it just a coincidence?

I think it's clear evidence that the Holocaust never happened.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom