• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Stem Cells on Demand without Embryos

materia3

Muse
Joined
May 1, 2004
Messages
560
Non-Embryonic Stem Cells

An Indian biotech firm, TriStem, is featured in a New Scientist story this week for its discovery of a technique making embryos unnecessary to make stem cells or for stem cell therapy. All they need is the patient’s own blood, which they treat with an antibody called CR3/43 that is made by a Danish firm, DakoCytomation.

The discovery was made by accident when the new firm’s founder, working as a lab researcher in a military hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, forgot to add complement to a mixture of CR3/43 which was supposed to destroy anything bound to the antibodies (like the leukemia virus being treated). The journal is comparing this discovery to Fleming’s pencillin; and others are saying that textbooks will have to be rewritten when this is over. And yes, it is also Nobel prize winning stuff. But it is early yet. The firm, has successfully treated only 4 patients so far with aplastic anemia.

They have had no failures as these were the only 4 cases they have treated.

They do it by taking a sample of the patient’s own blood , treating their immune cells with the antibody for a few hours and then giving it back to them.

The technique causes what is considered a biological heresy to occur: the blood cells “retrodifferentiated” back to bone marrow stem cells. But the firm has also discovered the technique not only causes retro-differentiation back to bone marrow stem cells, but farther than that, to cells with properties identical to embryonic stem cells.

A George Washington University researcher has been the recipient of his own beating muscle heart cells which he is researching after the TriStem founder drew some of his blood and incubated his blood cells with the antibody and the growth factor that makes heart muscle cells. A few hours later she invited GU scientist Tim McCaffrey to look at his cells under a microscope. He could not believe his eyes: his blood cells were now beating like heart muscle.

New Scientist October 9-15, 2004.
pp. 36-40.

DO YOU BELIEVE IN MIRACLES?

Maverick researchers claim to be saving people's lives with a stem cell therapy that medical text books say can't exist. New Scientist went to investigate p.36

http://www.newscientist.com/inprint/;jsessionid=HBEPCBKCDHKD

Note: Unfortunately the story is NOT online; I have my hard copy of this issue from which I summarized the details above. However TriStem has a website now and has details of this research on it:

http://www.tristemcorp.com/
 
This is almost too amazing to believe. Does the article explain how the antibody accomplishes the retrodifferentiation?

~~ Paul
 
Its not yet clear just how retrodifferentiated the modified cells are. It is unknown if they are true bone marrow cells known as hematopoietic stem cells which can self regenerate indefinitely and so be a permanent cure. Richard Boyd's (of Monash Univ-Au)
hunch (he witnessed the 4 treatments) is that they can be less retrodifferentiated progenitor stem cells which, while capable of producing all the cells of the blood system, cannot self regenerate. In that case the antibody treatment might need to be repeated every few months -- still a major advance over current therapies.
paraphrased from New Scientist


No, they don't know how it works yet but since Dolly the cloned sheep was created, retrodifferentiation is not as far fetched as it once was since the process occurs in cloning.
 
When my dad was in the late stages of cancer, one of his surgeons (I think) described some cancer tissue as "de-differentiated." Am I remembering this correctly? Is that, in fact, a phenomenon that occurs in cancer? If so, one could imagine finding a way to trigger the process in healthy cells.

But wouldn't it be a leap to knowing whether the cells actually had the same broad potential as stem cells?
 
Some of the best discoveries ever were accidents. Accidents resulting in an end product that was recognized as having potential.

I will be hoping to hear more, and that research in other countries will be allowed.
 
Bump.

No new news...how long should it take for verification anyway?

Or are we talking paradigm shift here?

I saw in an article that many scientists are skeptical, indeed, they wonder why the guy who did it (unpronouncable Indian name) has never had a permanent educational position, or whatnot. In any case, no news is BAD news, in this case. You'd think it would be swarming on the scene, yes?
 
To quote Fleming;-


Jings!

Crivvens!


Help ma boab!


Edit: If this is real... bye bye blood bank. Among a lot of other things.

The web site doesn't give much away, naturally, (It does say they expect to first roll out practical applications in mid 2003??)

I'm wondering why I haven't heard the screams of "heresy" from all over.

Anyone know more about the technicalites of the process?


Eos- "Chance favours the prepared mind." If this lady is right, let's applaud her for seeing what was actually there. It's a rare talent.
 

Back
Top Bottom