*split* Lyte's proof that the Lloyd England's experience is false

Lyte Trip said:
Tell ya what Disb.

Go talk to the witnesses, show them the footage, and ask them if we misrepresented them.

If they do, we will release all the raw footage.

You are no different than a conspiracy theorist, with your wild accusations and theories. :p
Click to expand...

Please cook the footage before release.

No one likes raw feet.
 
JamesB said:
I have to disagree with you there. Nobody would even make a movie with such a stupid plot. Suspension of disbelief can only go so far.
Click to expand...


Yes, listen to yourselves.

With people like you, they can get away with anything.
 
Rrramon said:
Lyte, you are never going to going to bring the 9/11 conspirators to justice if you don't take these questions seriously.
Click to expand...

Lyte is proving once again that he doesn't REALLY believe what he claims to believe. It's not possible for someone without debilitating brain injuries to buy into the ridiculous notion that some shadowy organization would come up with a plan so stupendously and clumsily convoluted that it would take twice as many resources to cover it up than to execute it in the first place.

He's doing it for attention, plain and simple.
 
Rrramon said:
Lyte, you are never going to going to bring the 9/11 conspirators to justice if you don't take these questions seriously.
Click to expand...

Sorry, I couldn't resist. I don't think my opinion would matter much here.

What do you think caused the damage to his windshield?
 
April 27th, 2007 - 11 Days since I began counting from Lytes declaration to me that he had brought his evidence to "authorities", but that I had to be patient, as these investigations take time...

ELEVEN DAYS

TAM:)
 
Lyte Trip said:
No 95% of 20-30 aviation professionals.

I am sorry they are not over-confident, anonymous, "critical thinkers", on a magician's forum board.

We should have consulted you guys on the pentagon attack. Clearly you know what you are talking about.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...


Get real Lyte.

That's Pdho's board.

He and his socks have a long history here.

Which one will you be wearing today?


your credibility is taking flight
 
aggle-rithm said:
So...you believe they did something unbelievably stupid and needlessly complicated...because they can?
Click to expand...

No because they did.

Funny, a lot of professionals state that same thing for Hani Hanjour.

He "did something unbelievably stupid and needlessly complicated".
 
Lyte Trip said:
Sorry, I couldn't resist. I don't think my opinion would matter much here.

What do you think caused the damage to his windshield?
Click to expand...


So, you say your opinion won't matter but you have no problem posting in thread after thread about your theories? If the questions get to hard, do you just quit answering and run in the corner to hide?

By the way, it was a lightpole that caused the damage.
 
Disbelief said:
So, you say your opinion won't matter but you have no problem posting in thread after thread about your theories? If the questions get to hard, do you just quit answering and run in the corner to hide?

By the way, it was a lightpole that caused the damage.
Click to expand...

The witnesses in the PentaCon are not a "theory" my friend.

The C-130 pilot's account being impossible is not a "theory".
 
Lyte Trip said:
No 95% of 20-30 aviation professionals.
Click to expand...
That's not what you said when we got down to brass tacks. Must I reconstuct it for you, or would you care to scroll up a few posts and try again?

And being "aviation professionals" (though I do not concede this at the moment) does not make them crash scene investigators. This is fairly simple stuff.

I am sorry they are not over-confident, anonymous, "critical thinkers", on a magician's forum board.
Click to expand...
Then leave if you don't like it here.

We should have consulted you guys on the pentagon attack. Clearly you know what you are talking about.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Yawn.
 
Lyte Trip said:
The witnesses in the PentaCon are not a "theory" my friend.
Click to expand...

Witnesses are obviously not a theory, since they are real. However, there accounts of the day contribute to your theory. Also, there are more witnesses disputing your theory (even yours do it) than supporting it.

Lyte said:
The C-130 pilot's account being impossible is not a "theory".
Click to expand...

Again, why are you disparaging a military man with your crappy accusations? Did you interview him? Would you tell him to his face that he is complicit in the crime you purported happened? I asked you before and I will ask again, do you understand what it means "... to protect from all threats, both foreign and domestic?"
 
aggle-rithm said:
Lyte is proving once again that he doesn't REALLY believe what he claims to believe. It's not possible for someone without debilitating brain injuries to buy into the ridiculous notion that some shadowy organization would come up with a plan so stupendously and clumsily convoluted that it would take twice as many resources to cover it up than to execute it in the first place.
Click to expand...

Bears repeating...
 
Lyte Trip said:
The witnesses in the PentaCon are not a "theory" my friend.
Click to expand...

Nor is it "evidence".

The C-130 pilot's account being impossible is not a "theory".
Click to expand...

No, it's a lie.

No because they did.
Click to expand...

Circular reasoning.

Funny, a lot of professionals state that same thing for Hani Hanjour.

He "did something unbelievably stupid and needlessly complicated".
Click to expand...

Flying into a building is stupid and complicated ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom