• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

South Tower 81st floor filled with thermite?

The large amount of explosives under the basements emulated a strong enough earthquake
But this would have made an enormously loud KABOOM, which is not in evidence in any eyewitness accounts (you think they're all liars/shills anyway), audio recordings (which you also proclaim are all fakes), nor in the physical evidence (which you refuse to even acknowledge).

Hmmm... :rolleyes:
 
Not if the managers at Fuji Bank really believed they had ordered a UPS system, but that it was in reality a kind of thermite Trojan horse that was installed.
:dl:

That wouldn't be believable in a Saturday morning cartoon.
 
Ha. I checked NCSTAR 1-3C and the document doesn't say that the steel from floor 81 was NOT damaged!

Oh. My. God.

Of COURSE it was damaged! It was involved in the global collapse of one of the freakin' tallest buildings on the planet; the idea that it might not be damaged is ludicrous beyond belief. I'd have been suspicious if it WEREN'T damaged.

Epic. Fail.
 
If the 81st floor was full of thermite...then why didn't the collapse start at the 81st floor? ...and the UPS was only in one tower, what happened in the other tower?
 
This is borderline psychotic thinking. You are aware that there is not a single audio recording of an explosive charge being detonated on 9/11 correct?

I have seen two videos showing explosions seconds before the onset of the collapse of the towers (maybe it was the same North Tower but anyway). The latest was in the documentary 911 Witness I posted about previously in this thread. In that documentary they also talk about 30 feet high dust plumes coming up from the ground around the tower seconds before the start of the collapse. And they talk about several witnesses having said that they felt earthquake like tremblings seconds before the start of the collapse for each tower. Tremblings, not audible boom mind you.
 
If the 81st floor was full of thermite...then why didn't the collapse start at the 81st floor? ...and the UPS was only in one tower, what happened in the other tower?

Very good point. I have seen one floor snap at the start of the collapse of one of the towers. For the South Tower the collapse should start at floor 81, or maybe 80 (since the thermite would have melted the floor between 80 and 81). So yes, definitely, the collapse should for the South Tower start at floor 80-81. Didn't it? I have myself not been able to determine exactly which floor that snapped in the videos of the collapse.
 
I work with forklifts. 100% electric are my specialty. Everything you say is correct. This one, from my "wall of shame" collection, was from the cables shorting on the battery cover when it was closed. This happened in about 1 second with lots of white smoke (as reported by the operator).
batterymelt.jpg
When I was in high school I was working on my car and dropped a wrench, and as luck would have it it landed perfectly across the terminals of the battery. Within 2 seconds it was glowing bright red and then melted in half before I could knock it away with another wrench.
 
But this would have made an enormously loud KABOOM, which is not in evidence in any eyewitness accounts (you think they're all liars/shills anyway), audio recordings (which you also proclaim are all fakes), nor in the physical evidence (which you refuse to even acknowledge).

Hmmm... :rolleyes:

No, the explosives were placed under the basements. No loud boom. Only earthquake-like tremblings.
 
If the 81st floor was full of thermite...then why didn't the collapse start at the 81st floor? ...and the UPS was only in one tower, what happened in the other tower?

I forgot your other question. The other tower? I have no clue, except it would have been a similar scenario with only one or two floors rigged with lots of thermite.
 
Oh. My. God.

Of COURSE it was damaged! It was involved in the global collapse of one of the freakin' tallest buildings on the planet; the idea that it might not be damaged is ludicrous beyond belief. I'd have been suspicious if it WEREN'T damaged.

Epic. Fail.

What I meant is that much of the steel could have been melted on floor 81 in the South Tower and they could just have omitted that fact, together with omitting facts about large pools of molten metal at Ground Zero.
 
That's what I have been saying for a long time. I wrote about that stuff months ago (probably even much earlier than that).

Well, excuse me for not following your Twitter feed. The idea that conspirators not only planted super-secret explosives in the WTC towers, but planted different types in multiple locations, seems a little far-fetched when you hear it for the first time.
 
Well, excuse me for not following your Twitter feed. The idea that conspirators not only planted super-secret explosives in the WTC towers, but planted different types in multiple locations, seems a little far-fetched when you hear it for the first time.

lol @ the Twitter feed comment. :D Personally I think that my theory is very simple and would be fairly easy to plan and carry out by only a few people.
 
Well, excuse me for not following your Twitter feed. The idea that conspirators not only planted super-secret explosives in the WTC towers, but planted different types in multiple locations, seems a little far-fetched when you hear it for the first time.
What? He also thinks there were no planes. Frankly the term "attention whore" comes to mind.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom