• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

So you're an atheist. Ok, what next?

Kind of. The word "atheist" doesn't say anything about a persons beliefs, values or hair colour. All it means is lack of one particular belief. An atheist might believe in absolutely nothing or they might believe in absolutely everything except for deities.

The word "atheist" only makes sense from a theist perspective. If there were no theists, there would be no reason to point out that a person lacks theist beliefs. Calling someone "non-Nepalese" only makes sense from a Nepalese perspective. It is only useful to distinguish people from Nepal from everybody else. In some situations it might be useful to consider people as either Nepalese or not -- if you are discussing things that are unique for Nepalese people. However, being non-Nepalese doesn't really say anything about a person except for their lack of Nepalese nationality. If Nepal didn't exist, there would be no non-Nepalese people.

It's really not as simple as that.
There may be some atheists with all kinds of other unusual beliefs, but in practice (in this forum, certainly) atheism almost always goes along with a positive belief in the philosophy of exclusive materialism.
The moral systems derived from exclusive materialism have proved to be disastrous.
Possibly this is why atheists now are so reluctant to admit to explicitly tying their atheism to anything non-negative.
 
That's all fine.. but none of that, as far as I can see, is derived from a belief in atheism, rather it's derived from you examining your conscience as any decent theist would do also.
Atheism does not encourage mankind to see equal value in our fellow beings, yet theism does, quite insistently.
Atheism remains silent on the matter, as it does on so many other important issues.
Thus those who are atheists will be less likely to be regularly exposed to the positive moral exhortations typical of theism.
That doesn't mean any individual atheist is bound to be more immoral, but the general influence will be in that direction.

So we should expect to see a higher rate of atheists in prison than theists, right?
 
And I resent the idea I have no desire to help others because I am an Atheist, and thus follow no values. Working in the homeless sector, with a dear colleague being an Atheist too (An ex-heroin addict who quit it not because of Christ but himself), I have to stick a strong, stiff middle finger up at you.
 
It's really not as simple as that.
There may be some atheists with all kinds of other unusual beliefs, but in practice (in this forum, certainly) atheism almost always goes along with a positive belief in the philosophy of exclusive materialism.
The moral systems derived from exclusive materialism have proved to be disastrous.
Possibly this is why atheists now are so reluctant to admit to explicitly tying their atheism to anything non-negative.

Do you live near a farm? I imagine it would be handy for the amount of straw you must need.
 
It's really not as simple as that.
There may be some atheists with all kinds of other unusual beliefs, but in practice (in this forum, certainly) atheism almost always goes along with a positive belief in the philosophy of exclusive materialism.

Butter usually goes along with bread. Going by your logic, butter and bread must be the same thing.
 
That's all fine.. but none of that, as far as I can see, is derived from a belief in atheism, rather it's derived from you examining your conscience as any decent theist would do also.
I would venture to say this is the same with you. Oh sure you give God credit, but do you honestly think your morality would be different if the only thing different about you was that you had a different view of religion? If so, then you might want to consider if you really are a good person at heart or if you're doing it for praise.

Atheism does not encourage mankind to see equal value in our fellow beings, yet theism does, quite insistently.
LOL. You think so? I think some theists do, while other theists hate and murder our fellow human beings. Some even use their theism as an excuse. Western Christianity is not this way as much as it used to be, but it is still very much self-serving.

Atheism remains silent on the matter, as it does on so many other important issues.
What matter are atheists required to keep silent on? You seem to continue to object because atheism is not an organized church that makes press statements. If anything, atheists are more moral than theists because they don't seek recognition when they do something good.

Thus those who are atheists will be less likely to be regularly exposed to the positive moral exhortations typical of theism.
Having been exposed to theists all my life, I've discovered that they are just humans. Some of them are more moral than others. Some of the "positive moral exhortations typical of theism" amount to people who blame natural disasters on sinners. Some theists exhort people to send money to their television mission. Some prey on the elderly and grieving by promising them communication with the dead that they cannot deliver.

This whole "Theists are more moral than atheists" tack is a losing one, Plumjam, and a thinly veiled insult at people who, for the most part, are every bit as moral as you. And you are by no means the first theist to make such insulting statements. Is insulting those who don't share their religion part of their "positive moral exhortations"? It sounds pretty hateful to me. I'm glad most theists don't feel this way.

That doesn't mean any individual atheist is bound to be more immoral, but the general influence will be in that direction.
Actually, it suggests that theists are basically immoral, and must be herded into morality by making them believe a myth. Of course, this is not true, but I caution you about pursuing this line of logic. It will backfire on you.
 
Last edited:
And I resent the idea I have no desire to help others because I am an Atheist, and thus follow no values. Working in the homeless sector, with a dear colleague being an Atheist too (An ex-heroin addict who quit it not because of Christ but himself), I have to stick a strong, stiff middle finger up at you.

yeah, but the point is that neither of you were so inspired by atheism that you chose to go into working with the homeless, whereas some people who wouldn't otherwise have dreamed of doing that are so inspired by theism that they go into that area.
 
It's really not as simple as that.
There may be some atheists with all kinds of other unusual beliefs, but in practice (in this forum, certainly) atheism almost always goes along with a positive belief in the philosophy of exclusive materialism.
The moral systems derived from exclusive materialism have proved to be disastrous.
Possibly this is why atheists now are so reluctant to admit to explicitly tying their atheism to anything non-negative.

Can you cite some evidence to support your apparent belief that atheism is synonymous with materialism. It's certainly not true of the atheists I know.
 
well, I'd never heard of it..

No wonder.:rolleyes:

so I Wiki'd it, and it turns out to be a film movement starting in 1943 and ending in 1951.
I don't know, maybe it did some good. But it couldn't have been very much.

Oh, so now it is some good is it? Tell me, when a man picks hair from his head, at which stage does he go bald? Is it when 3,142 hairs have been removed or 3,143?

It produced The Bicycle Theives, often called the greatest film of all time, and Sight And Sounds Number One Film of all time. There is also a very interesting scene in a church. It says a lot.
 
yeah, but the point is that neither of you were so inspired by atheism that you chose to go into working with the homeless, whereas some people who wouldn't otherwise have dreamed of doing that are so inspired by theism that they go into that area.

Is it better to do things because they are the right things to do or because you feel God will approve?
 
And yet somehow, when the Pope, God's supposed representative on Earth, says that you shouldn't save yourself from AIDS with condoms, this isn't a black stain on Christian 'values'.
 
I would venture to say this is the same with you. Oh sure you give God credit
I don't give God credit for anything.

but do you honestly think your morality would be different if the only thing different about you was that you had a different view of religion? If so, then you might want to consider if you really are a good person at heart or if you're doing it for praise.
on a personal level, in my case (which is the only case I can speak about with any authority) I would say that throughout my adult life, even when I was an atheist, I was reasonably moral, with my faults. Theism, however, has tended to reduce my feeling of separation from other sentient beings, resulting in a greater feeling of empathy and compassion.
It'll be different for every individual, but I believe that is the general trend.


LOL. You think so? I think some theists do, while other theists hate and murder our fellow human beings. Some even use their theism as an excuse.
If and when they do that they're wrong. It's a practice much more common and intense in moral systems which expressly forbid theism.

Western Christianity is not this way as much as it used to be, but it is still very much self-serving.
Is it? Or is it just that your mind focuses on the self-serving bits rather than the huge charitable part?

What matter are atheists required to keep silent on? You seem to continue to object because atheism is not an organized church that makes press statements.
There is no central dictat, but then that is not needed. They commonly keep silent on the consequences of moral and political systems that have shared their exclusive materialism.

If anything, atheists are more moral than theists because they don't seek recognition when they do something good.
well, we just saw Bill Gates

Having been exposed to theists all my life, I've discovered that they are just humans. Some of them are more moral than others.
Agreed.

Some of the "positive moral exhortations typical of theism" amount to people who blame natural disasters on sinners. Some theists exhort people to send money to their television mission. Some prey on the elderly and grieving by promising them communication with the dead that they cannot deliver.
Yeah. Some.


This whole "Theists are more moral than atheists" tack is a losing one, Plumjam, and a thinly veiled insult at people who, for the most part, are every bit as moral as you. And you are by no means the first theist to make such insulting statements. Is insulting those who don't share their religion part of their "positive moral exhortations"? It sounds pretty hateful to me. I'm glad most theists don't feel this way.
If you interpret all this as insulting that's your prerogative. It wasn't meant as an insult; I started the thread to try to get atheists to face up to the 'what next?' aspect of their belief system... which IMO is basically a big nothing.
I would never say any individual atheist is likely to be less moral than any individual theist. But there is massive denial about the dangers of exclusive materialism when that philosophy is allowed to be expressed in the form of moral and political systems.
I don't believe this has yet been fully admitted or reflected upon by the great majority of atheists.
Further to that, the kind of politicking in favour of exclusive materialism going on recently.. if that were translated into political power, I'm sure the great majority of atheists here would be horrified by the end results.
Sure, it's not likely to get far off the ground, but the likely consequences if it did are not something ever honestly addressed here.
 
No wonder.:rolleyes:



Oh, so now it is some good is it? Tell me, when a man picks hair from his head, at which stage does he go bald? Is it when 3,142 hairs have been removed or 3,143?

It produced The Bicycle Theives, often called the greatest film of all time, and Sight And Sounds Number One Film of all time. There is also a very interesting scene in a church. It says a lot.

that's great. It's all had such an impact on humanity that for some reason society has been hiding all this from me for all my 36 years :rolleyes:
 
Let's say you've lived at least a couple of decades,
Yes, 3.
you've examined the options, and you've arrived at atheism.
Yes.
Well.
Here you are.
Indeed. Here, as you adeptly point out, I am. I am here. Here I am.
What do you do now?
Well, I'm trying to balance law school with being a husband and a new dad, which is challenging, but a lot of fun. Also I try to hang out with friends, play some Wii, maybe do some reading, see a movie now and then.
Let's say you then spend a few years trying to rescue other humans from what you (not they) regard as stupidity.
That's an interesting description of what a lawyer does, actually, although I don't think it applies to all lawyers. I suppose it could also be an description of what a parent does, in a sense. So, as a new parent and a soon-to-be lawyer, maybe I will spend a few years doing that.

Or did you mean proselytizing for atheism? Why would I spend a few years, or even a few minutes, doing that?
Ok. Then what?
Retirement, travel, more reading.
What can you do that is positive?
Mainly raise my daughter the best I can. Career-wise, some lawyers are in a position to do very positive things. Think Ralph Nader, think Gideon's Trumpet, think The Buffalo Creek Disaster. I don't know if I'll be in that position, but I can hope! Maybe I could get into politics, if the American public can overcome its bigotry enough to consider voting for an otherwise qualified atheist.
Are there any specifically atheist 'values'?
Of course not. Assuming you don't believe in leprechauns, are there any values you hold that directly flow out of your nonbelief in leprechauns?
Are there any specifically atheist charities that endeavour to improve the plight of individuals?
Not that I'm aware of. But I'm pretty sure there are secular (non-religious) charities. Bill Gates gives billions through his foundation, and he's at least an agnostic, maybe an atheist. Warren Buffet is an atheist and he gives billions as well. It doesn't matter to me if a charity is administered by theists or atheists, as long as it's administered well. Also, there's nothing stopping me from giving to a religious charity - again, presuming it's administered well. If I make enough money, I could even start my own atheist charity. Red Nothing? No, what's the point? If I start a charity, it would be secular, of course, but there's no reason it would have to be specifically atheist. Do you know of any charities specifically devoted to a nonbelief in leprechauns? Isn't it the case that most charities completely ignore the question of the existence of leprechauns? That would be my charity's position on God.
(I don't think I've heard of any. Whereas religious charities there are thousands.)
Indeed. I think some of those charities are probably fine, and when I start making some money, I wouldn't be surprised if some of my charitable giving goes to religious charities.
Well, it's up to you. What next?
Preferably positive.
Raising my daughter. Completing my degree. Establishing my career, and hopefully making a positive difference through my work. Further service through politics, if it seems feasible (not likely). Charitable giving. Retirement. Travel. The pleasures of growing old with my family. Dying in my sleep at an advanced age. And that would be it!

Is this what you were looking for?
 
Last edited:
And yet somehow, when the Pope, God's supposed representative on Earth, says that you shouldn't save yourself from AIDS with condoms, this isn't a black stain on Christian 'values'.

there is a whole self-consistent rationale behind that which would need a whole other thread to go into.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom