so who wants to talk bout wally miller anyways?

[TC329]

http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...i=A8e_SK71Com-igKh9aChCQ&q=wally+miller&hl=en

maybe mark?

lol

 

[MarkyX]

Jesus christ, worst interview ever. Not because of the content, but what the **** is that background noise and what's with the mic?

 

[TC329]

you watched a 46 minute interview in less than 7 minutes. fascinating.....

anyways the background noise is the air conditioner running in wally's office.

how'd you like the way he deconstructed the official story in the 1st 3 minutes?
i also have that account corroborated by multiple eyewitnesses [all of whom also recommended to be interviewed by jref members]. ouch.

 

[MarkyX]

you watched a 46 minute interview in less than 7 minutes. fascinating.....

anyways the background noise is the air conditioner running in wally's office.

how'd you like the way he deconstructed the official story in the 1st 3 minutes?
i also have that account corroborated by multiple eyewitnesses [all of whom also recommended to be interviewed by jref members]. ouch.

I didn't watch the entire thing.

Still trying to see the "deconstruction", since he is mentioning small parts and the plane never slowed down..

The interviewer mentions no human remains in indian lake that was reported by the media...yet I never heard of this before. The interviewer is trying to lead Wally as well, just making stuff up so Wally can appear to answer "incorrectly"

Besides, why are they asking a coroner about what happened to the plane? His job was to identify human remains.

 

[TC329]

I didn't watch the entire thing.

obvious and typical.

Still trying to see the "deconstruction", since he is mentioning small parts and the plane never slowed down..

you missed the whole plane coming from the northeast, wings at a 90 degree angle hitting right wing tip first shattering the front 1/3 of the plane into the woods?

The interviewer mentions no human remains in indian lake that was reported by the media...yet I never heard of this before. The interviewer is trying to lead Wally as well, just making stuff up so Wally can appear to answer "incorrectly"

of course you've never heard of this before you are neither a researcher or an investigator. in fact i think your claim to fame is adding a voice track over someone else's work if i'm not mistaken.....

PGH Post Gazette

Finding the flight data recorder had been the focus of investigators as they widened their search area today following the discoveries of more debris, including what appeared to be human remains, miles from the point of impact at a reclaimed coal mine..........

Besides, why are they asking a coroner about what happened to the plane? His job was to identify human remains.

it was his site.

 

[MarkyX]

So one site which wasn't even sure if it was human remains is all of a sudden "media reports" ?

Sorry, this is trying to lead the interview.

 

[TC329]

yawn.....

you are neither an investigator nor a researcher. i have not time to waste educating the ignorant. learn to use a search engine and more sources you will find.

you could actually call some indian lake residents too. ;-)

 

[bynmdsue]

HOLY S-word!

You think this vid helps your case?
Really?

 

[applecorped]

AAH

 

[Calcas]

Welcome back Dom. Your 31 day suspension was just lifted this morning and THIS is the best you can bring us? Yawn.

BTW, maybe I've missed it but what, exactly, is your theory of what happened at Shanksville? I'm particularly interested in what happened to the passengers.

And, please, save us the whole "I don't know what did happen only what didn't happen" nonsense.

 

[johnny karate]

What is it with Truthers and their agonizingly long and stupid videos? Are you trying to bore us to The Truth? If you've got a point to make, or you think you've proven something, just state your damn case already instead of making people slog through another one of your ridiculous videos.

you are neither an investigator nor a researcher.

Funny that you would say something like this considering the fact that not a single professional investigator on the entire planet seems all that interested in whatever shocking story you've think you've uncovered here. I wonder why that is?

 

[Drudgewire]

What is it with Truthers and their agonizingly long and stupid videos?

So when sane people get annoyed within minutes and turn it away they can respond "you aren't looking at the evidence, you're dismissing it out of hand."

Hmmm, I wish I could find an example of this somewhere, but where oh where would I look?

you watched a 46 minute interview in less than 7 minutes. fascinating.....

Well how about that?

 

[uk_dave]

So when sane people get annoyed within minutes and turn it away they can respond "you aren't looking at the evidence, you're dismissing it out of hand."

Hmmm, I wish I could find an example of this somewhere, but where oh where would I look?

Well, that and as a calling card for a career in the media when the 'truth' establishes a new world order........ oooops

Well how about that?

We speed watch just like 'truthers' speed read official reports.

 

[chillzero]

Both sides. STOP making threads personal. Deal with the topic, or posts / threads will be moved.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero

 

[funk de fino]

you watched a 46 minute interview in less than 7 minutes. fascinating.....

anyways the background noise is the air conditioner running in wally's office.

how'd you like the way he deconstructed the official story in the 1st 3 minutes?i also have that account corroborated by multiple eyewitnesses [all of whom also recommended to be interviewed by jref members]. ouch.

First 48 secs is pissy music and titles and long shots, no deconstructing of anything

From 48 secs to 2.00 min mark he supports the official line and deconstructs nothing.

From 2.00 min mark to 3.00 min mark he denies the body parts in the lake that truthers claim were there and debunkers usually say were not there. This deconstructs some truther bot claims. He also during this segment gets the plane angle and bank wrong compared to the FDR data. This deconstructs nothing as he is clearly mistaken. This is not unusual as he is a coroner and knows nothing about aircraft flight geometry or flight envelopes. Also he is not a witness to the crash so would not know this. There are other witness who coroborate the FDR data.

Epic fail in the first 3.00 mins and a false claim again by OP

Is it worth me watching the rest if it is as bad as the firt 3.00 mins?

 

[Bobert]

I had to immediately stop the video when I saw the first title.
Then I saw this

of course you've never heard of this before you are neither a researcher or an investigator. in fact i think your claim to fame is adding a voice track over someone else's work if i'm not mistaken.....

May no longer display the CIT badge but still has the same stink.
I see you are working on your next ban there Dom congrats.

 

[funk de fino]

Holy stuff batman

He then ridicules truthers and destroys the no bodies claims in the next 4 mins. No deconstructing of the official story at all.

Is this a truther video or a debunking video?

 

[WildCat]

TC329 has apparently abandoned his previous claims of drones swooping under power lines and is now claiming that Flight 93 actually got shot down because the passengers were revolting (yes, many questions about this scenario). Flight 93 was headed to the Capital building to kill everyone in Congress which would have allowed Bush to declare martial law.

Yes, he really does have such a stupid theory in mind, don't you TC329?

 

[beachnut]

Holy stuff batman

He then ridicules truthers and destroys the no bodies claims in the next 4 mins. No deconstructing of the official story at all.

Is this a truther video or a debunking video?

Proof 9/11 truth members are the worse investigators since Inspector Clouseau.

Why are they self-debunking?

 

[beachnut]

TC329 has apparently abandoned his previous claims of drones swooping under power lines and is now claiming that Flight 93 actually got shot down because the passengers were revolting (yes, many questions about this scenario). Flight 93 was headed to the Capital building to kill everyone in Congress which would have allowed Bush to declare martial law.

Yes, he really does have such a stupid theory in mind, don't you TC329?

Here are some F-4 on my wing. I am in a KC-135 (707 like), and they are close enough to see my eyes. Why would someone shoot down 93 without confirming by eye, the terrorist are in control? Some truth idiots forget the FAA is in control of the skies, and an intercept can't just buzz thought other planes and kill others as they close on the target.

Shooting down an airliner is not something done without confirmation, and these F-4 are loose right now, you should see close! So the fact is there is no FAA confirmation of any intercept over PA, so TC lost again.