Snopes Resolves the whole NAU Nutjob Theory

The last paragraph on the linked snopes article, they leave themselves a caveat that basically contradicts the whole entry!!?!?

I'm sure it won't happen by 2010 either. That's hardly the point!
 
The last paragraph on the linked snopes article, they leave themselves a caveat that basically contradicts the whole entry!!?!?

I'm sure it won't happen by 2010 either. That's hardly the point!

If you want to talk about contradictions we could talk about how you slam the mainstream media yet have no problem citing them when they serve your agenda. Now THAT is a contradiction worthy of an award.
 
If you want to talk about contradictions we could talk about how you slam the mainstream media yet have no problem citing them when they serve your agenda. Now THAT is a contradiction worthy of an award.

Are you really arguing that the facts from a source you trust are not relevant because he has distrusted them in the past?


:eek:
 
None of this is to say that the three North American countires might not someday decide to form closer ties along the lines of the European Union, perhaps with a common currency and more fliud borders. But there is currently no official governmental plan underway to make all that happen by 2010.

Snopes told us so. It is not happening by 2010. Duhh.
 
Jerome is a attention whore looking to showcase his online superiority.
The problem is the only way he can accomplish this goal is through a
bet. Which I'm impling is just your ego arguing just to argue at this point.
 
Jerome is a attention whore looking to showcase his online superiority.
The problem is the only way he can accomplish this goal is through a
bet. Which I'm impling is just your ego arguing just to argue at this point.

Of course you missed the fact that Corsair and I have a history talking about this subject. Sorry that you were not in on the joke.

What would you call it when a poster attempts to "call-out" another poster?
Personal attack?

What did your post have to do with the subject?
Nothing?
 
Last edited:
So you are stating that the SPP has ZERO authority?


YES, the SPP has ZERO authority to do ANYTHING except talk and debate. Countries national policies will not change based on ANYTHING the SPP comes up with, until those changes are approved by the countries' legislative bodies.
 
Of course you missed the fact that Corsair and I have a history talking about this subject. Sorry that you were not in on the joke.

What would you call it when a poster attempts to "call-out" another poster?
Personal attack?

What did your post have to do with the subject?
Nothing?

It was a browbeating comment but made for a good reason... Corsair should have to bother with your pesky arguing just to argue banter no longer. Swallow your pride and walk way. Because the audience has already turned brutus and nolonger sees your relevance Caesar.

You want to argue a "what if" yet the facts don't back you up at all. you're speaking nothing but conjecture fruit cup.
 
Last edited:
YES, the SPP has ZERO authority to do ANYTHING except talk and debate. Countries national policies will not change based on ANYTHING the SPP comes up with, until those changes are approved by the countries' legislative bodies.

It is designed to function within the authority of the executive branch thus neglecting the congress entirely.
 
It is designed to function within the authority of the executive branch thus neglecting the congress entirely.




Once again showing that you haven't bothered to read anything.



Myth: The SPP is being undertaken without the knowledge of the U.S. Congress.

Fact: U.S. agencies involved with SPP regularly update and consult with members of Congress on our efforts and plans.

Myth: The SPP infringes on the sovereignty of the United States.

Fact: The SPP respects and leaves the unique cultural and legal framework of each of the three countries intact. Nothing in the SPP undermines the U.S. Constitution. In no way does the SPP infringe upon the sovereignty of the United States.

Myth: The SPP is illegal and violates the Constitution.

Fact: The SPP is legal and in no way violates the Constitution or affects the legal authorities of the participating executive agencies. Indeed, the SPP is an opportunity for the governments of the United States, Canada, and Mexico to discuss common goals and identify ways to enhance each nation’s security and prosperity. If an action is identified, U.S. federal agencies can only operate within U.S. law to address these issues. The Departments of Commerce and Homeland Security coordinate the efforts of the agencies responsible for the various initiatives under the prosperity and security pillars of the SPP. If an agency were to decide a regulatory change is desirable through the cooperative efforts of SPP, that agency is required to conform to all existing U.S. laws and administrative procedures, including an opportunity to comment.
 
It is designed to function within the authority of the executive branch thus neglecting the congress entirely.

Ah so now the executive branch can do anything it wants without authority from congress eh? Kinda makes you wonder what the point is in having the other branches if the executive branch over rides them eh? Maybe you can explain this for us. Please, continue. And tell us about this authority that SPP has as well.
 
Are you really arguing that the facts from a source you trust are not relevant because he has distrusted them in the past?


:eek:

I'm merely pointing out the hypocrisy of the truther agenda. If HH is going to go OOOOOOOOO THE EVIL MAINSTREAM CORPORATE MEDIA IS BRAINWASHING US and then in a thread a week later post a story from CBS, ABC, or any other mainstream media that fits his agenda I'm calling him out in it. He can't have it both ways. If you go to Prison Planet, you will see it happen all the time.
 
Ah so now the executive branch can do anything it wants without authority from congress eh? Kinda makes you wonder what the point is in having the other branches if the executive branch over rides them eh? Maybe you can explain this for us. Please, continue. And tell us about this authority that SPP has as well.

This is a long standing point of mine.

You let me know when the last war that America fought was declared by congress, and how many wars have been fought undeclared since.

The above is just the most easily understood example.
 
Once again showing that you haven't bothered to comprehend what you have copy/pasted out side of the headlines and bullets.



Once again, making allusions that you comprehend things better than us, but not making any attempt to explain or demonstrate that alleged comprehension beyond making obviously erroneous statements that are easily refuted.
 
Once again, making allusions that you comprehend things better than us, but not making any attempt to explain or demonstrate that alleged comprehension beyond making obviously erroneous statements that are easily refuted.

Better than us?

Do you have a mouse in your pocket?

Who is "us"?


I am honestly confused by this statement.
 

Back
Top Bottom