Smokescreen at the Pentagon

yankee451 said:
Hahaha - are you seriously implying that's what I was implying?

You see, in the video you haven't watched there's a burst of fire before the smoke machine really get's it's groove-on, as it were. This is likely because their heating element was too hot as they added their smoke fluid. I don't need to imply anything - it's right there on the video.
Click to expand...

Looks at video.

notes no "burst of flame," and certainly no sustained flames like we see in the Pentagon video.

Yankee being dishonest again.
 
you have to call me a liar

Yankee451,

I post only rarely, when profoundly provoked. You have done so. Let me be very, very clear. You have been mocking the deaths of thousands with your nonsense. And now you have turned to the Pentagon.

I was there. I was then an active duty Air Force Lt Colonel. I was there when the airplane hit. I was inside and I was outside and saw aircraft wreckage. I held aircraft wreckage in my own hands as I did my small service that day. I saw hurt people. I saw burned people. I saw bodies. I saw it all.

For your nonsense to be correct, you must now specifically and clearly call me a liar. You must make this personal, not just a game to you. For you to be right, I have to be a liar.

I clearly state to you that I held airplane parts, that an airplane hit my building, and murdered my fellow military and civilian personnel.

That you would start this thread as we approach 9/11 again shows to me that you are either heartless and mean, or perhaps 14 and bored. I sincerely hope it is the latter.

So, call me a liar, or back off.

It's not a game. It's personal.

I will not respond to any further posts. It's hell enough living with the memories, I don't need to be pestered by people like you.

call me a liar.

Lt Col Hal Bidlack, USAF (Ret.)
 
Hal Bidlack said:
Yankee451,

I post only rarely, when profoundly provoked. You have done so. Let me be very, very clear. You have been mocking the deaths of thousands with your nonsense. And now you have turned to the Pentagon.

I was there. I was then an active duty Air Force Lt Colonel. I was there when the airplane hit. I was inside and I was outside and saw aircraft wreckage. I held aircraft wreckage in my own hands as I did my small service that day. I saw hurt people. I saw burned people. I saw bodies. I saw it all.

For your nonsense to be correct, you must now specifically and clearly call me a liar. You must make this personal, not just a game to you. For you to be right, I have to be a liar.

I clearly state to you that I held airplane parts, that an airplane hit my building, and murdered my fellow military and civilian personnel.

That you would start this thread as we approach 9/11 again shows to me that you are either heartless and mean, or perhaps 14 and bored. I sincerely hope it is the latter.

So, call me a liar, or back off.

It's not a game. It's personal.

I will not respond to any further posts. It's hell enough living with the memories, I don't need to be pestered by people like you.

call me a liar.

Lt Col Hal Bidlack, USAF (Ret.)
Click to expand...

I'm sure some insensitive, hypocrite and conceited truther will tell you that the perpetrators have fooled you as well :rolleyes:

Thanks for sharing your story.
 
Robrob said:
I notice you continue to claim the existence of a tube. :confused:
Click to expand...

Well, billowing smoke emitting from a circular aperture then. Here's a still shot of the video you won't watch. Looks like a tubular aperture to me, but you say potato, I say spud.

 
yankee451 said:
Well, billowing smoke emitting from a circular aperture then. Here's a still shot of the video you won't watch. Looks like a tubular aperture to me, but you say potato, I say spud.

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_642255227c4e6252a7.png[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Why do you continue to post this when you can't back any of it up with evidence? Especially concerning that you have direct evidence available to you that fully supports the common narrative of that day? That is not Truth finding. That is just plain stubborn attention seeking.
 
LSSBB said:
Why do you continue to post this when you can't back any of it up with evidence? Especially concerning that you have direct evidence available to you that fully supports the common narrative of that day? That is not Truth finding. That is just plain stubborn attention seeking.
Click to expand...

The common narrative never mentioned the smoke machine billowing plumes of white smoke.
 
LSSBB said:
Well, see, that's more evidence to support the common narrative then! It doesn't rely on machines that no one found or saw on site!
Click to expand...

You guys crack me up. No - it means the people who planted the smoke machine also control the narrative.
 
yankee451 said:
Um, anyone with eyes can see white smoke billowing from a circular aperture. What part of the plane or building caused that, eh?

The flames that were first visible were ignited smoke fluid, but after that - no flames. So much for where there's smoke, there's fire, eh?

We have a historical impersonator who claims he was there, but he won't tell me if he saw the smoke machine impersonating a fire.
Click to expand...

You got smoke from an airplane crash site. There are circular things there. You don't have evidence of a smoke machine. You do have an imagination, so you got that going for you. The Lt. Col. is a real person. You can find information regarding him online. He owes you nothing else.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom