Merged Sludge smear/Ghetto Bama

On this we agree. When anything over 5% of the electorate still believes birther nonsense, AGW nonsense, creationism nonsense... well, the electorate is highly suspect. Hopefully will get it right, but there is certainly no guarantee.

Oy vey, don't remind me about the crazies... =[

BTW, I think I most of my response to Unabogie also applies for you... the "dog-on-roof" was not a leverage against the wright incident. It was to a time limit applied by people on issues similar.
 
Last edited:
And Obama chowing down on a dog isn't/wasn't worth discussing. Nope: no double standard at all.

It sure isn't worth discussing.

Frankly it baffles me that anyone ever thought that was a big deal.

I mean meat is meat.
 
And Obama chowing down on a dog isn't/wasn't worth discussing. Nope: no double standard at all.

Neither story was really worth discussing and only the really partisan people pretended otherwise. But like it or not, there is a difference in the way the electorate approaches incumbents and challengers. The incumbent can run on his record, or he can run on the notion that the challenger is a scary person. Not surprisingly, Obama has chosen the latter course, as running on his record would be suicidal.

But challengers cannot run on the notion that the incumbent is scary, because the incumbent is familiar to us. The scary incumbent routine only mobilizes the base.
 

Back
Top Bottom